[skip-ci] Clarification for dup vs clone docs

Both clone & dup returns a new object when executed
on the documentation looks like they are returning the
same object cloned or dup'ed which is true for method
as extend, but not for the above mentioned.

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/object.c b/object.c
index b47635f1fd..9fb14817cd 100644
--- a/object.c
+++ b/object.c
@@ -550,11 +550,11 @@ rb_obj_clone(VALUE obj)
  *	s1.extend(Foo) #=> #<Klass:0x401b3a38>
  *	s1.foo #=> "foo"
  *
- *	s2 = s1.clone #=> #<Klass:0x401b3a38>
+ *	s2 = s1.clone #=> #<Klass:0x401be280>
  *	s2.foo #=> "foo"
  *
- *	s3 = s1.dup #=> #<Klass:0x401b3a38>
- *	s3.foo #=> NoMethodError: undefined method `foo' for #<Klass:0x401b3a38>
+ *	s3 = s1.dup #=> #<Klass:0x401c1084>
+ *	s3.foo #=> NoMethodError: undefined method `foo' for #<Klass:0x401c1084>
  *--
  * Equivalent to \c Object\#dup in Ruby
  *++