summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/spec/ruby/core/kernel/eval_spec.rb
blob: ad06af7b050af917ff029fc237d389fdd07cf65d (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
require_relative '../../spec_helper'
require_relative 'fixtures/classes'

EvalSpecs::A.new.c

describe "Kernel#eval" do
  it "is a private method" do
    Kernel.should have_private_instance_method(:eval)
  end

  it "is a module function" do
    Kernel.respond_to?(:eval).should == true
  end

  it "evaluates the code within" do
    eval("2 + 3").should == 5
  end

  it "coerces an object to string" do
    eval(EvalSpecs::CoercedObject.new).should == 5
  end

  it "evaluates within the scope of the eval" do
    EvalSpecs::A::B.name.should == "EvalSpecs::A::B"
  end

  it "evaluates such that consts are scoped to the class of the eval" do
    EvalSpecs::A::C.name.should == "EvalSpecs::A::C"
  end

  it "finds a local in an enclosing scope" do
    a = 1
    eval("a").should == 1
  end

  it "updates a local in an enclosing scope" do
    a = 1
    eval("a = 2")
    a.should == 2
  end

  it "updates a local in a surrounding block scope" do
    EvalSpecs.new.f do
      a = 1
      eval("a = 2")
      a.should == 2
    end
  end

  it "updates a local in a scope above a surrounding block scope" do
    a = 1
    EvalSpecs.new.f do
      eval("a = 2")
      a.should == 2
    end
    a.should == 2
  end

  it "updates a local in a scope above when modified in a nested block scope" do
    a = 1
    es = EvalSpecs.new
    eval("es.f { es.f { a = 2 } }")
    a.should == 2
  end

  it "finds locals in a nested eval" do
    eval('test = 10; eval("test")').should == 10
  end

  it "does not share locals across eval scopes" do
    code = fixture __FILE__, "eval_locals.rb"
    ruby_exe(code).chomp.should == "NameError"
  end

  it "doesn't accept a Proc object as a binding" do
    x = 1
    bind = proc {}

    lambda { eval("x", bind) }.should raise_error(TypeError)
  end

  it "does not make Proc locals visible to evaluated code" do
    bind = proc { inner = 4 }
    lambda { eval("inner", bind.binding) }.should raise_error(NameError)
  end

  # REWRITE ME: This obscures the real behavior of where locals are stored
  # in eval bindings.
  it "allows a binding to be captured inside an eval" do
    outer_binding = binding
    level1 = eval("binding", outer_binding)
    level2 = eval("binding", level1)

    eval("x = 2", outer_binding)
    eval("y = 3", level1)

    eval("w=1", outer_binding)
    eval("w", outer_binding).should == 1
    eval("w=1", level1).should == 1
    eval("w", level1).should == 1
    eval("w=1", level2).should == 1
    eval("w", level2).should == 1

    eval("x", outer_binding).should == 2
    eval("x=2", level1)
    eval("x", level1).should == 2
    eval("x=2", level2)
    eval("x", level2).should == 2

    eval("y=3", outer_binding)
    eval("y", outer_binding).should == 3
    eval("y=3", level1)
    eval("y", level1).should == 3
    eval("y=3", level2)
    eval("y", level2).should == 3
  end

  it "uses the same scope for local variables when given the same binding" do
    outer_binding = binding

    eval("if false; a = 1; end", outer_binding)
    eval("a", outer_binding).should be_nil
  end

  it "allows creating a new class in a binding" do
    bind = proc {}
    eval("class EvalBindingProcA; end; EvalBindingProcA.name", bind.binding).should =~ /EvalBindingProcA$/
  end

  it "allows creating a new class in a binding created by #eval" do
    bind = eval "binding"
    eval("class EvalBindingA; end; EvalBindingA.name", bind).should =~ /EvalBindingA$/
  end

  it "includes file and line information in syntax error" do
    expected = 'speccing.rb'
    lambda {
      eval('if true',TOPLEVEL_BINDING, expected)
    }.should raise_error(SyntaxError) { |e|
      e.message.should =~ /#{expected}:1:.+/
    }
  end

  it "evaluates string with given filename and negative linenumber" do
    expected_file = 'speccing.rb'
    lambda {
      eval('if true',TOPLEVEL_BINDING, expected_file, -100)
    }.should raise_error(SyntaxError) { |e|
      e.message.should =~ /#{expected_file}:-100:.+/
    }
  end

  it "sets constants at the toplevel from inside a block" do
    # The class Object bit is needed to workaround some mspec oddness
    class Object
      [1].each { eval "Const = 1"}
      Const.should == 1
      remove_const :Const
    end
  end

  it "uses the filename of the binding if none is provided" do
    eval("__FILE__").should == "(eval)"
    eval("__FILE__", binding).should == __FILE__
    eval("__FILE__", binding, "success").should == "success"
    eval("eval '__FILE__', binding").should == "(eval)"
    eval("eval '__FILE__', binding", binding).should == __FILE__
    eval("eval '__FILE__', binding", binding, 'success').should == 'success'
  end

  # Found via Rubinius bug github:#149
  it "does not alter the value of __FILE__ in the binding" do
    first_time =  EvalSpecs.call_eval
    second_time = EvalSpecs.call_eval

    # This bug is seen by calling the method twice and comparing the values
    # of __FILE__ each time. If the bug is present, calling eval will set the
    # value of __FILE__ to the eval's "filename" argument.

    second_time.should_not == "(eval)"
    first_time.should == second_time
  end

  it "can be aliased" do
    alias aliased_eval eval
    x = 2
    aliased_eval('x += 40')
    x.should == 42
  end

  # See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-5163
  it "uses the receiver as self inside the eval" do
    eval("self").should equal(self)
    Kernel.eval("self").should equal(Kernel)
  end

  it "does not pass the block to the method being eval'ed" do
    lambda {
      eval('KernelSpecs::EvalTest.call_yield') { "content" }
    }.should raise_error(LocalJumpError)
  end

  it "returns from the scope calling #eval when evaluating 'return'" do
    lambda { eval("return :eval") }.call.should == :eval
  end

  it "unwinds through a Proc-style closure and returns from a lambda-style closure in the closure chain" do
    code = fixture __FILE__, "eval_return_with_lambda.rb"
    ruby_exe(code).chomp.should == "a,b,c,eval,f"
  end

  it "raises a LocalJumpError if there is no lambda-style closure in the chain" do
    code = fixture __FILE__, "eval_return_without_lambda.rb"
    ruby_exe(code).chomp.should == "a,b,c,e,LocalJumpError,f"
  end
end