| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
If the PR title or body already contains the full bugs.ruby-lang.org
URL for a referenced ticket, there is no need to post a redundant link
in a comment.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
Extract the PR API call into the review method and pass it to
review_non_fork_branch and review_redmine_links so the same endpoint
is not fetched twice per run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
When a pull request title or body contains references like [Bug #22003],
[Feature #12345], or [Misc #67890], automatically post a comment with
links to the corresponding bugs.ruby-lang.org issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
|
|
PRs filed from branches in ruby/ruby (rather than forks) make it
harder to manage the bi-directional mirror with git.ruby-lang.org.
Add an auto-review comment asking contributors to re-file from a fork.
Refactor #review into separate methods for each review type.
|
|
It is also useful to distribution changes to each upstream repository.
|
|
|
|
Follow-up: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/15116
|
|
|