| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-19 | Update to ruby/spec@6e62695 | Benoit Daloze | |
| 2025-10-05 | [ruby/pp] [Feature #21389] Update rubyspec | Nobuyoshi Nakada | |
| 2025-06-25 | Simplify Set#inspect output | Jeremy Evans | |
| As Set is now a core collection class, it should have special inspect output. Ideally, inspect output should be suitable to eval, similar to array and hash (assuming the elements are also suitable to eval): set = Set[1, 2, 3] eval(set.inspect) == set # should be true The simplest way to do this is to use the Set[] syntax. This deliberately does not use any subclass name in the output, similar to array and hash. It is more important that users know they are dealing with a set than which subclass: Class.new(Set)[] # this does: Set[] # not: #<Class:0x00000c21c78699e0>[] This inspect change breaks the power_assert bundled gem tests, so add power_assert to TEST_BUNDLED_GEMS_ALLOW_FAILURES in the workflows. Implements [Feature #21389] | |||
| 2025-05-20 | Remove SortedSet autoload and set/sorted_set | Jeremy Evans | |
| Implements [Feature #21287] Notes: Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/13188 | |||
| 2025-05-13 | Add specs for Set mutation during iteration | Jean Boussier | |
| 2025-05-13 | Set#merge: raise if called during iteration | Jean Boussier | |
| [Bug #21332] Notes: Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/13322 | |||
| 2025-05-09 | Update to ruby/spec@d8bacef | Andrew Konchin | |
| Notes: Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/13265 | |||
 |
index : ruby.git | |
| The Ruby Programming Language |
| summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff |