Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/bb66253f2c
|
|
Looks for the CHECKSUMS section in the lockfile, activating the feature
only if the section exists. Without a CHECKSUMS section, Bundler will
continue as normal, validating checksums when gems are installed while
checksums from the compact index are present.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/2353cc93a4
|
|
This gets the specs passing, and handles the fact that we expect
checkums to be pinned only to a particular source
This also avoids reading in .gem files during lockfile generation,
instead allowing us to query the source for each resolved gem to grab
the checksum
Finally, this opens up a route to having user-stored checksum databases,
similar to how other package managers do this!
Add checksums to dev lockfiles
Handle full name conflicts from different original_platforms when adding checksums to store from compact index
Specs passing on Bundler 3
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/86c7084e1c
|
|
We lock the checksum for each resolved spec under a new CHECKSUMS
section in the lockfile.
If the locked spec does not resolve for the local platform, we preserve
the locked checksum, similar to how we preserve specs.
Checksum locking only makes sense on install. The compact index
information is only available then.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/bde37ca6bf
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/86b574824d
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/27ed6870ce
|
|
sources
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/9712262d90
|
|
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/5317
|
|
It doesn't add anything.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/ece3c864df
|
|
If the lockfile contains multiple platforms, `bundle check` would show
duplicated missing gems.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/6ac5931783
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/4789
|
|
As part of a recent bug fix where bundler was accidentally hitting the
network when not supposed to, I made some refactoring, and the commit I'm
reverting here
(https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/d74830d00bb541883377992f56818620a78930b0)
was some cleanup that those refactorings allowed according to "past me".
That was completely wrong, `bundle check` should never consider cached
gems, only installed gems, so the code that was removed was necessary.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/5483e98305
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/4789
|
|
This is in preparation for deprecating source-less gemfiles.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/d6493fa3e2
|
|
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/4648
|
|
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/4533
|
|
55634a8af18a52df86c4275d70fa1179118bcc20
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/4021
|
|
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3901
|
|
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3864
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/27e0e4ecb6
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3275
|
|
Since our helpers now raise by default if the subcommand fails, these
will never actually fail and are not necessary.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/6153b9321e
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3275
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/4d1a0c465a
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/746a4b3d74
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/ade0c441d5
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
This command was silently failing but doesn't really affect the outcome
of the spec.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/7880d08146
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
It turns out that this test is checking essentially nothing useful. The
paperclip gem doesn't exist in our setup, so initial install is failing
and the test is only checking that calling `bundle check` 3 times on a
broken setup always returns the same thing.
I went to the history of this test:
* https://github.com/rubygems/bundler/commit/105654a31e07e9b0a198f1a5a5ec94e365854edf
* https://github.com/rubygems/bundler/commit/ae53be1f8748bfc41bc6565dc4922a1c0ac80998
* https://github.com/rubygems/bundler/commit/d19f4a7b32ccf4ec4ecda5c7c0354adc81e1efb6
* https://github.com/rubygems/bundler/commit/092f169d01472336598e29b32550399991940d63
* https://github.com/rubygems/bundler/commit/36878435b5f0be75fc6f2e07cebd7f15aaddadf0
And have finally decided to remove it since I'm not sure changing it to
something else will lead to testing something useful and not already
tested.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/6184322967
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
The `rails_fail` name is misleading because there's no specific reason
why such a gem would need to fail. As a matter of fact, `bundle
install`'ing a Genfile with only that dependency like the spec the
previous commit adds is not expected to fail.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/b947f40701
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
Instead, use the non-deprecated option except when specifically testing
deprecated CLI flags. In that case, pass the flag directly and limit
the specs to `bundler < 3`.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/3d5e186241
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3086
|
|
And skip them all for bundler 3.
https://github.com/bundler/bundler/commit/b88936cdc2
|
|
https://github.com/bundler/bundler/commit/b7fc6f4187
|
|
https://github.com/bundler/bundler/commit/5946d62ad0
|
|
Pick from 8dd59e3ba97eb80a599f8149f31bf40773b69dc0
|
|
https://github.com/bundler/bundler/commit/a53709556b95a914e874b22ed2116a46b0528852
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@67539 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@66710 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
|
|
We have the platform issue on heroku:
* https://gist.github.com/schneems/26452540f6e2bbbcf2ea144f45f6b305
* https://github.com/heroku/heroku-buildpack-ruby/issues/833
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@66323 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
|
|
* It update bundler 2 mode to bundler 3.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@65523 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
|
|
* bin/*, lib/bundler/*, lib/bundler.rb, spec/bundler, man/*:
Merge from latest stable branch of bundler/bundler repository and
added workaround patches. I will backport them into upstream.
* common.mk, defs/gmake.mk: Added `test-bundler` task for test suite
of bundler.
* tool/sync_default_gems.rb: Added sync task for bundler.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@65509 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
|
|
I faced a big issue about Bundler with ruby core.
I have no time to resolve it issue before 2.5 final release.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@61416 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
|
|
* lib/bundler, spec/bundler: Merge bundler-1.16.0.
* common.mk: rspec examples of bundler-1.16.0 needs require option.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@60603 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
|
|
rubygems 2.7.x depends bundler-1.15.x. This is preparation for
rubygems and bundler migration.
* lib/bundler.rb, lib/bundler/*: files of bundler-1.15.4
* spec/bundler/*: rspec examples of bundler-1.15.4. I applied patches.
* https://github.com/bundler/bundler/pull/6007
* Exclude not working examples on ruby repository.
* Fake ruby interpriter instead of installed ruby.
* Makefile.in: Added test task named `test-bundler`. This task is only
working macOS/linux yet. I'm going to support Windows environment later.
* tool/sync_default_gems.rb: Added sync task for bundler.
[Feature #12733][ruby-core:77172]
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@59779 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
|