summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/rubygems/test_gem_resolver.rb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'test/rubygems/test_gem_resolver.rb')
-rw-r--r--test/rubygems/test_gem_resolver.rb535
1 files changed, 535 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/rubygems/test_gem_resolver.rb b/test/rubygems/test_gem_resolver.rb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..80769de8cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/rubygems/test_gem_resolver.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,535 @@
+require 'rubygems/test_case'
+
+class TestGemResolver < Gem::TestCase
+
+ def setup
+ super
+
+ @DR = Gem::Resolver
+ end
+
+ def make_dep(name, *req)
+ Gem::Dependency.new(name, *req)
+ end
+
+ def set(*specs)
+ StaticSet.new(specs)
+ end
+
+ def assert_resolves_to expected, resolver
+ actual = resolver.resolve
+
+ exp = expected.sort_by { |s| s.full_name }
+ act = actual.map { |a| a.spec }.sort_by { |s| s.full_name }
+
+ msg = "Set of gems was not the same: #{exp.map { |x| x.full_name}.inspect} != #{act.map { |x| x.full_name}.inspect}"
+
+ assert_equal exp, act, msg
+ rescue Gem::DependencyResolutionError => e
+ flunk e.message
+ end
+
+ def test_self_compatibility
+ assert_same Gem::Resolver, Gem::DependencyResolver
+ end
+
+ def test_self_compose_sets_multiple
+ index_set = @DR::IndexSet.new
+ vendor_set = @DR::VendorSet.new
+
+ composed = @DR.compose_sets index_set, vendor_set
+
+ assert_kind_of Gem::Resolver::ComposedSet, composed
+
+ assert_equal [index_set, vendor_set], composed.sets
+ end
+
+ def test_self_compose_sets_nil
+ index_set = @DR::IndexSet.new
+
+ composed = @DR.compose_sets index_set, nil
+
+ assert_same index_set, composed
+
+ e = assert_raises ArgumentError do
+ @DR.compose_sets nil
+ end
+
+ assert_equal 'one set in the composition must be non-nil', e.message
+ end
+
+ def test_self_compose_sets_single
+ index_set = @DR::IndexSet.new
+
+ composed = @DR.compose_sets index_set
+
+ assert_same index_set, composed
+ end
+
+ def test_handle_conflict
+ a1 = util_spec 'a', 1
+
+ r1 = Gem::Resolver::DependencyRequest.new dep('a', '= 1'), nil
+ r2 = Gem::Resolver::DependencyRequest.new dep('a', '= 2'), nil
+ r3 = Gem::Resolver::DependencyRequest.new dep('a', '= 3'), nil
+
+ existing = Gem::Resolver::ActivationRequest.new a1, r1, false
+
+ res = Gem::Resolver.new [a1]
+
+ res.handle_conflict r2, existing
+ res.handle_conflict r2, existing
+ res.handle_conflict r3, existing
+
+ assert_equal 2, res.conflicts.length
+ end
+
+ def test_no_overlap_specificly
+ a = util_spec "a", '1'
+ b = util_spec "b", "1"
+
+ ad = make_dep "a", "= 1"
+ bd = make_dep "b", "= 1"
+
+ deps = [ad, bd]
+
+ s = set(a, b)
+
+ res = Gem::Resolver.new(deps, s)
+
+ assert_resolves_to [a, b], res
+ end
+
+ def test_pulls_in_dependencies
+ a = util_spec "a", '1'
+ b = util_spec "b", "1", "c" => "= 1"
+ c = util_spec "c", "1"
+
+ ad = make_dep "a", "= 1"
+ bd = make_dep "b", "= 1"
+
+ deps = [ad, bd]
+
+ s = set(a, b, c)
+
+ res = Gem::Resolver.new(deps, s)
+
+ assert_resolves_to [a, b, c], res
+ end
+
+ def test_picks_highest_version
+ a1 = util_spec "a", '1'
+ a2 = util_spec "a", '2'
+
+ s = set(a1, a2)
+
+ ad = make_dep "a"
+
+ res = Gem::Resolver.new([ad], s)
+
+ assert_resolves_to [a2], res
+ end
+
+ def test_picks_best_platform
+ is = Gem::Resolver::IndexSpecification
+ unknown = Gem::Platform.new 'unknown'
+ a2_p1 = a3_p2 = nil
+
+ spec_fetcher do |fetcher|
+ a2_p1 = fetcher.spec 'a', 2 do |s| s.platform = Gem::Platform.local end
+ a3_p2 = fetcher.spec 'a', 3 do |s| s.platform = unknown end
+ end
+
+ v2 = v(2)
+ v3 = v(3)
+ source = Gem::Source.new @gem_repo
+
+ s = set
+
+ a2 = is.new s, 'a', v2, source, Gem::Platform::RUBY
+ a2_p1 = is.new s, 'a', v2, source, Gem::Platform.local.to_s
+ a3_p2 = is.new s, 'a', v3, source, unknown
+
+ s.add a3_p2
+ s.add a2_p1
+ s.add a2
+
+ ad = make_dep "a"
+
+ res = Gem::Resolver.new([ad], s)
+
+ assert_resolves_to [a2_p1], res
+ end
+
+ def test_only_returns_spec_once
+ a1 = util_spec "a", "1", "c" => "= 1"
+ b1 = util_spec "b", "1", "c" => "= 1"
+
+ c1 = util_spec "c", "1"
+
+ ad = make_dep "a"
+ bd = make_dep "b"
+
+ s = set(a1, b1, c1)
+
+ res = Gem::Resolver.new([ad, bd], s)
+
+ assert_resolves_to [a1, b1, c1], res
+ end
+
+ def test_picks_lower_version_when_needed
+ a1 = util_spec "a", "1", "c" => ">= 1"
+ b1 = util_spec "b", "1", "c" => "= 1"
+
+ c1 = util_spec "c", "1"
+ c2 = util_spec "c", "2"
+
+ ad = make_dep "a"
+ bd = make_dep "b"
+
+ s = set(a1, b1, c1, c2)
+
+ res = Gem::Resolver.new([ad, bd], s)
+
+ assert_resolves_to [a1, b1, c1], res
+ end
+
+ def test_conflict_resolution_only_effects_correct_spec
+ a1 = util_spec "a", "1", "c" => ">= 1"
+ b1 = util_spec "b", "1", "d" => ">= 1"
+
+ d3 = util_spec "d", "3", "c" => "= 1"
+ d4 = util_spec "d", "4", "c" => "= 1"
+
+ c1 = util_spec "c", "1"
+ c2 = util_spec "c", "2"
+
+ ad = make_dep "a"
+ bd = make_dep "b"
+
+ s = set(a1, b1, d3, d4, c1, c2)
+
+ res = Gem::Resolver.new([ad, bd], s)
+
+ assert_resolves_to [a1, b1, c1, d4], res
+
+ cons = res.conflicts
+
+ assert_equal 1, cons.size
+ con = cons.first
+
+ assert_equal "c (= 1)", con.dependency.to_s
+ assert_equal "c-2", con.activated.full_name
+ end
+
+ def test_raises_dependency_error
+ a1 = util_spec "a", "1", "c" => "= 1"
+ b1 = util_spec "b", "1", "c" => "= 2"
+
+ c1 = util_spec "c", "1"
+ c2 = util_spec "c", "2"
+
+ ad = make_dep "a"
+ bd = make_dep "b"
+
+ s = set(a1, b1, c1, c2)
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad, bd], s)
+
+ e = assert_raises Gem::DependencyResolutionError do
+ r.resolve
+ end
+
+ deps = [make_dep("c", "= 1"), make_dep("c", "= 2")]
+ assert_equal deps, e.conflicting_dependencies
+
+ con = e.conflict
+
+ act = con.activated
+ assert_equal "c-2", act.spec.full_name
+
+ parent = act.parent
+ assert_equal "b-1", parent.spec.full_name
+
+ act = con.requester
+ assert_equal "a-1", act.spec.full_name
+ end
+
+ def test_raises_when_a_gem_is_missing
+ ad = make_dep "a"
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad], set)
+
+ e = assert_raises Gem::UnsatisfiableDepedencyError do
+ r.resolve
+ end
+
+ assert_equal "Unable to resolve dependency: user requested 'a (>= 0)'",
+ e.message
+
+ assert_equal "a (>= 0)", e.dependency.to_s
+ end
+
+ def test_raises_when_a_gem_version_is_missing
+ a1 = util_spec "a", "1"
+
+ ad = make_dep "a", "= 3"
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad], set(a1))
+
+ e = assert_raises Gem::UnsatisfiableDepedencyError do
+ r.resolve
+ end
+
+ assert_equal "a (= 3)", e.dependency.to_s
+ end
+
+ def test_raises_and_reports_a_toplevel_request_properly
+ a1 = util_spec "a", "1"
+ ad = make_dep "a", "= 3"
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad], set(a1))
+
+ e = assert_raises Gem::UnsatisfiableDepedencyError do
+ r.resolve
+ end
+
+ assert_equal "Unable to resolve dependency: user requested 'a (= 3)'",
+ e.message
+ end
+
+ def test_raises_and_reports_an_implicit_request_properly
+ a1 = util_spec "a", "1" do |s|
+ s.add_runtime_dependency 'b', '= 2'
+ end
+
+ ad = make_dep "a", "= 1"
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad], set(a1))
+
+ e = assert_raises Gem::UnsatisfiableDepedencyError do
+ r.resolve
+ end
+
+ assert_equal "Unable to resolve dependency: 'a (= 1)' requires 'b (= 2)'",
+ e.message
+ end
+
+ def test_raises_when_possibles_are_exhausted
+ a1 = util_spec "a", "1", "c" => ">= 2"
+ b1 = util_spec "b", "1", "c" => "= 1"
+
+ c1 = util_spec "c", "1"
+ c2 = util_spec "c", "2"
+ c3 = util_spec "c", "3"
+
+ s = set(a1, b1, c1, c2, c3)
+
+ ad = make_dep "a"
+ bd = make_dep "b"
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad, bd], s)
+
+ e = assert_raises Gem::DependencyResolutionError do
+ r.resolve
+ end
+
+ dependency = e.conflict.dependency
+
+ assert_equal 'a', dependency.name
+ assert_equal req('>= 0'), dependency.requirement
+
+ activated = e.conflict.activated
+ assert_equal 'c-1', activated.full_name
+
+ assert_equal dep('c', '= 1'), activated.request.dependency
+
+ assert_equal [dep('c', '>= 2'), dep('c', '= 1')],
+ e.conflict.conflicting_dependencies
+ end
+
+ def test_keeps_resolving_after_seeing_satisfied_dep
+ a1 = util_spec "a", "1", "b" => "= 1", "c" => "= 1"
+ b1 = util_spec "b", "1"
+ c1 = util_spec "c", "1"
+
+ ad = make_dep "a"
+ bd = make_dep "b"
+
+ s = set(a1, b1, c1)
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad, bd], s)
+
+ assert_resolves_to [a1, b1, c1], r
+ end
+
+ def test_common_rack_activation_scenario
+ rack100 = util_spec "rack", "1.0.0"
+ rack101 = util_spec "rack", "1.0.1"
+
+ lib1 = util_spec "lib", "1", "rack" => ">= 1.0.1"
+
+ rails = util_spec "rails", "3", "actionpack" => "= 3"
+ ap = util_spec "actionpack", "3", "rack" => ">= 1.0.0"
+
+ d1 = make_dep "rails"
+ d2 = make_dep "lib"
+
+ s = set(lib1, rails, ap, rack100, rack101)
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new([d1, d2], s)
+
+ assert_resolves_to [rails, ap, rack101, lib1], r
+
+ # check it with the deps reverse too
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new([d2, d1], s)
+
+ assert_resolves_to [lib1, rack101, rails, ap], r
+ end
+
+ def test_backtracks_to_the_first_conflict
+ a1 = util_spec "a", "1"
+ a2 = util_spec "a", "2"
+ a3 = util_spec "a", "3"
+ a4 = util_spec "a", "4"
+
+ d1 = make_dep "a"
+ d2 = make_dep "a", ">= 2"
+ d3 = make_dep "a", "= 1"
+
+ s = set(a1, a2, a3, a4)
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new([d1, d2, d3], s)
+
+ assert_raises Gem::DependencyResolutionError do
+ r.resolve
+ end
+ end
+
+ def test_resolve_conflict
+ a1 = util_spec 'a', 1
+ a2 = util_spec 'a', 2
+
+ b2 = util_spec 'b', 2, 'a' => '~> 2.0'
+
+ s = set a1, a2, b2
+
+ a_dep = dep 'a', '~> 1.0'
+ b_dep = dep 'b'
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new [a_dep, b_dep], s
+
+ assert_raises Gem::DependencyResolutionError do
+ r.resolve
+ end
+ end
+
+ def test_resolve_bug_699
+ a1 = util_spec 'a', '1', 'b' => '= 2',
+ 'c' => '~> 1.0.3'
+
+ b1 = util_spec 'b', '2', 'c' => '~> 1.0'
+
+ c1 = util_spec 'c', '1.0.9'
+ c2 = util_spec 'c', '1.1.0'
+ c3 = util_spec 'c', '1.2.0'
+
+ s = set a1, b1, c1, c2, c3
+
+ a_dep = dep 'a', '= 1'
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new [a_dep], s
+
+ assert_resolves_to [a1, b1, c1], r
+ end
+
+ def test_resolve_rollback
+ a1 = util_spec 'a', 1
+ a2 = util_spec 'a', 2
+
+ b1 = util_spec 'b', 1, 'a' => '~> 1.0'
+ b2 = util_spec 'b', 2, 'a' => '~> 2.0'
+
+ s = set a1, a2, b1, b2
+
+ a_dep = dep 'a', '~> 1.0'
+ b_dep = dep 'b'
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new [a_dep, b_dep], s
+
+ assert_resolves_to [a1, b1], r
+ end
+
+ # actionmailer 2.3.4
+ # activemerchant 1.5.0
+ # activesupport 2.3.5, 2.3.4
+ # Activemerchant needs activesupport >= 2.3.2. When you require activemerchant, it will activate the latest version that meets that requirement which is 2.3.5. Actionmailer on the other hand needs activesupport = 2.3.4. When rubygems tries to activate activesupport 2.3.4, it will raise an error.
+
+
+ def test_simple_activesupport_problem
+ sup1 = util_spec "activesupport", "2.3.4"
+ sup2 = util_spec "activesupport", "2.3.5"
+
+ merch = util_spec "activemerchant", "1.5.0", "activesupport" => ">= 2.3.2"
+ mail = util_spec "actionmailer", "2.3.4", "activesupport" => "= 2.3.4"
+
+ s = set(mail, merch, sup1, sup2)
+
+ d1 = make_dep "activemerchant"
+ d2 = make_dep "actionmailer"
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new([d1, d2], s)
+
+ assert_resolves_to [merch, mail, sup1], r
+ end
+
+ def test_second_level_backout
+ b1 = new_spec "b", "1", { "c" => ">= 1" }, "lib/b.rb"
+ b2 = new_spec "b", "2", { "c" => ">= 2" }, "lib/b.rb"
+ c1 = new_spec "c", "1"
+ c2 = new_spec "c", "2"
+ d1 = new_spec "d", "1", { "c" => "< 2" }, "lib/d.rb"
+ d2 = new_spec "d", "2", { "c" => "< 2" }, "lib/d.rb"
+
+ s = set(b1, b2, c1, c2, d1, d2)
+
+ p1 = make_dep "b", "> 0"
+ p2 = make_dep "d", "> 0"
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new([p1, p2], s)
+
+ assert_resolves_to [b1, c1, d2], r
+ end
+
+ def test_select_local_platforms
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new nil, nil
+
+ a1 = util_spec 'a', 1
+ a1_p1 = util_spec 'a', 1 do |s| s.platform = Gem::Platform.local end
+ a1_p2 = util_spec 'a', 1 do |s| s.platform = 'unknown' end
+
+ selected = r.select_local_platforms [a1, a1_p1, a1_p2]
+
+ assert_equal [a1, a1_p1], selected
+ end
+
+ def test_raises_and_explains_when_platform_prevents_install
+ a1 = util_spec "a", "1" do |s|
+ s.platform = Gem::Platform.new %w[c p 1]
+ end
+
+ ad = make_dep "a", "= 1"
+
+ r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad], set(a1))
+
+ e = assert_raises Gem::UnsatisfiableDepedencyError do
+ r.resolve
+ end
+
+ assert_match "No match for 'a (= 1)' on this platform. Found: c-p-1",
+ e.message
+ end
+
+end
+