diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'spec/ruby/CONTRIBUTING.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | spec/ruby/CONTRIBUTING.md | 73 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/spec/ruby/CONTRIBUTING.md b/spec/ruby/CONTRIBUTING.md index e470a811ff..0b0f251440 100644 --- a/spec/ruby/CONTRIBUTING.md +++ b/spec/ruby/CONTRIBUTING.md @@ -13,12 +13,14 @@ Spec are grouped in 5 separate top-level groups: * `optional/capi`: for functions available to the Ruby C-extension API The exact file for methods is decided by the `#owner` of a method, for instance for `#group_by`: + ```ruby > [].method(:group_by) => #<Method: Array(Enumerable)#group_by> > [].method(:group_by).owner => Enumerable ``` + Which should therefore be specified in `core/enumerable/group_by_spec.rb`. ### MkSpec - a tool to generate the spec structure @@ -53,6 +55,11 @@ which indicates the file was generated but the method unspecified. Here is a list of frequently-used matchers, which should be enough for most specs. There are a few extra specific matchers used in the couple specs that need it. +The general idea is: add `.should` just before the predicate you expect to be truthy, and done! +This works for most needs and provides a great error when it fails. +It's immediately clear which method is used and there no need to remember a mapping like in RSpec between e.g. `eq` and `==`. +See [this blog post](https://eregon.me/blog/2019/10/07/a-new-should-syntax.html) for the motivation behind that syntax. + #### Comparison matchers ```ruby @@ -81,43 +88,37 @@ File.should.equal?(File) # Calls #equal? (tests identity) (0.1 + 0.2).should be_close(0.3, TOLERANCE) # (0.2-0.1).abs < TOLERANCE (0.0/0.0).should.nan? -(1.0/0.0).should be_positive_infinity -(-1.0/0.0).should be_negative_infinity -3.14.should be_an_instance_of(Float) # Calls #instance_of? -3.14.should be_kind_of(Numeric) # Calls #is_a? -Numeric.should be_ancestor_of(Float) # Float.ancestors.include?(Numeric) +3.14.should.instance_of?(Float) # Calls #instance_of? +3.14.should.is_a?(Numeric) # Calls #is_a? 3.14.should.respond_to?(:to_i) -Integer.should have_instance_method(:+) -Array.should have_method(:new) +Integer.should.method_defined?(:+, false) ``` -Also `have_constant`, `have_private_instance_method`, `have_singleton_method`, etc. - #### Exception matchers ```ruby -> { raise "oops" -}.should raise_error(RuntimeError, /oops/) +}.should.raise(RuntimeError, /oops/) -> { raise "oops" -}.should raise_error(RuntimeError) { |e| +}.should.raise(RuntimeError) { |e| # Custom checks on the Exception object e.message.should.include?("oops") e.cause.should == nil } ``` -##### should_not raise_error +##### `should_not.raise` -**To avoid!** Instead, use an expectation testing what the code in the lambda does. +**Avoid this!** Instead, use an expectation testing what the code in the lambda does. If an exception is raised, it will fail the example anyway. ```ruby --> { ... }.should_not raise_error +-> { ... }.should_not.raise ``` #### Warning matcher @@ -136,12 +137,12 @@ Here is a list of the most commonly-used guards: #### Version guards ```ruby -ruby_version_is ""..."2.6" do - # Specs for RUBY_VERSION < 2.6 +ruby_version_is ""..."3.2" do + # Specs for RUBY_VERSION < 3.2 end -ruby_version_is "2.6" do - # Specs for RUBY_VERSION >= 2.6 +ruby_version_is "3.2" do + # Specs for RUBY_VERSION >= 3.2 end ``` @@ -162,7 +163,7 @@ end platform_is_not :linux, :darwin do # Not Linux and not Darwin end -platform_is wordsize: 64 do +platform_is pointer_size: 64 do # 64-bit platform end @@ -173,12 +174,16 @@ end #### Guard for bug -In case there is a bug in MRI but the expected behavior is obvious. +In case there is a bug in MRI and the fix will be backported to previous versions. +If it is not backported or not likely, use `ruby_version_is` instead. First, file a bug at https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/. -It is better to use a `ruby_version_is` guard if there was a release with the fix. +The problem is `ruby_bug` would make non-MRI implementations fail this spec while MRI itself does not pass it, so it should only be used if the bug is/will be fixed and backported. +Otherwise, non-MRI implementations would have to choose between being incompatible with the latest release of MRI (which has the bug) to pass the spec, or behave the same as the latest release of MRI (which has the bug) and fail the spec, both which make no sense. + +IOW, `ruby_bug '#NN', ''...'X.Y' do` is equivalent to `guard_not { RUBY_ENGINE == "ruby" && ruby_version_is ''...'X.Y' } do`. So it skips tests on MRI on specified versions (where a bug is present) and runs tests on alternative implementations only. ```ruby -ruby_bug '#13669', ''...'2.5' do +ruby_bug '#13669', ''...'3.2' do it "works like this" do # Specify the expected behavior here, not the bug end @@ -188,11 +193,11 @@ end #### Combining guards ```ruby -guard -> { platform_is :windows and ruby_version_is ""..."2.6" } do - # Windows and RUBY_VERSION < 2.6 +guard -> { platform_is :windows and ruby_version_is ""..."3.2" } do + # Windows and RUBY_VERSION < 3.2 end -guard_not -> { platform_is :windows and ruby_version_is ""..."2.6" } do +guard_not -> { platform_is :windows and ruby_version_is ""..."3.2" } do # The opposite end ``` @@ -220,7 +225,7 @@ If an implementation does not support some feature, simply tag the related specs ### Shared Specs Often throughout Ruby, identical functionality is used by different methods and modules. In order -to avoid duplication of specs, we have shared specs that are re-used in other specs. The use is a +to avoid duplication of specs, we have shared specs that are re-used in other specs. The use is a bit tricky however, so let's go over it. Commonly, if a shared spec is only reused within its own module, the shared spec will live within a @@ -232,7 +237,7 @@ An example of this is the `shared/file/socket.rb` which is used by `core/file/so `core/filetest/socket_spec.rb`, and `core/file/state/socket_spec.rb` and so it lives in the root `shared/`. Defining a shared spec involves adding a `shared: true` option to the top-level `describe` block. This -will signal not to run the specs directly by the runner. Shared specs have access to two instance +will signal not to run the specs directly by the runner. Shared specs have access to two instance variables from the implementor spec: `@method` and `@object`, which the implementor spec will pass in. Here's an example of a snippet of a shared spec and two specs which integrates it: @@ -257,29 +262,29 @@ end ``` In the example, the first `describe` defines the shared spec `:hash_key_p`, which defines a spec that -calls the `@method` method with an expectation. In the implementor spec, we use `it_behaves_like` to -integrate the shared spec. `it_behaves_like` takes 3 parameters: the key of the shared spec, a method, -and an object. These last two parameters are accessible via `@method` and `@object` in the shared spec. +calls the `@method` method with an expectation. In the implementor spec, we use `it_behaves_like` to +integrate the shared spec. `it_behaves_like` takes 3 parameters: the key of the shared spec, a method, +and an object. These last two parameters are accessible via `@method` and `@object` in the shared spec. Sometimes, shared specs require more context from the implementor class than a simple object. We can address -this by passing a lambda as the method, which will have the scope of the implementor. Here's an example of +this by passing a lambda as the method, which will have the scope of the implementor. Here's an example of how this is used currently: ```ruby describe :kernel_sprintf, shared: true do it "raises TypeError exception if cannot convert to Integer" do - -> { @method.call("%b", Object.new) }.should raise_error(TypeError) + -> { @method.call("%b", Object.new) }.should.raise(TypeError) end end describe "Kernel#sprintf" do - it_behaves_like :kernel_sprintf, -> (format, *args) { + it_behaves_like :kernel_sprintf, -> format, *args { sprintf(format, *args) } end describe "Kernel.sprintf" do - it_behaves_like :kernel_sprintf, -> (format, *args) { + it_behaves_like :kernel_sprintf, -> format, *args { Kernel.sprintf(format, *args) } end |
