summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/spec/bundler/resolver/basic_spec.rb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'spec/bundler/resolver/basic_spec.rb')
-rw-r--r--spec/bundler/resolver/basic_spec.rb422
1 files changed, 422 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/spec/bundler/resolver/basic_spec.rb b/spec/bundler/resolver/basic_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..185df1b1c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/bundler/resolver/basic_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,422 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+RSpec.describe "Resolving" do
+ before :each do
+ @index = an_awesome_index
+ end
+
+ it "resolves a single gem" do
+ dep "myrack"
+
+ should_resolve_as %w[myrack-1.1]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves a gem with dependencies" do
+ dep "actionpack"
+
+ should_resolve_as %w[actionpack-2.3.5 activesupport-2.3.5 myrack-1.0]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves a conflicting index" do
+ @index = a_conflict_index
+ dep "my_app"
+ should_resolve_as %w[activemodel-3.2.11 builder-3.0.4 grape-0.2.6 my_app-1.0.0]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves a complex conflicting index" do
+ @index = a_complex_conflict_index
+ dep "my_app"
+ should_resolve_as %w[a-1.4.0 b-0.3.5 c-3.2 d-0.9.8 my_app-1.1.0]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves a index with conflict on child" do
+ @index = index_with_conflict_on_child
+ dep "chef_app"
+ should_resolve_as %w[berkshelf-2.0.7 chef-10.26 chef_app-1.0.0 json-1.7.7]
+ end
+
+ it "prefers explicitly requested dependencies when resolving an index which would otherwise be ambiguous" do
+ @index = an_ambiguous_index
+ dep "a"
+ dep "b"
+ should_resolve_as %w[a-1.0.0 b-2.0.0 c-1.0.0 d-1.0.0]
+ end
+
+ it "prefers non-prerelease resolutions in sort order" do
+ @index = optional_prereleases_index
+ dep "a"
+ dep "b"
+ should_resolve_as %w[a-1.0.0 b-1.5.0]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves a index with root level conflict on child" do
+ @index = a_index_with_root_conflict_on_child
+ dep "i18n", "~> 0.4"
+ dep "activesupport", "~> 3.0"
+ dep "activerecord", "~> 3.0"
+ dep "builder", "~> 2.1.2"
+ should_resolve_as %w[activesupport-3.0.5 i18n-0.4.2 builder-2.1.2 activerecord-3.0.5 activemodel-3.0.5]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves a gem specified with a pre-release version" do
+ dep "activesupport", "~> 3.0.0.beta"
+ dep "activemerchant"
+ should_resolve_as %w[activemerchant-2.3.5 activesupport-3.0.0.beta1]
+ end
+
+ it "doesn't select a pre-release if not specified in the Gemfile" do
+ dep "activesupport"
+ dep "reform"
+ should_resolve_as %w[reform-1.0.0 activesupport-2.3.5]
+ end
+
+ it "doesn't select a pre-release for sub-dependencies" do
+ dep "reform"
+ should_resolve_as %w[reform-1.0.0 activesupport-2.3.5]
+ end
+
+ it "selects a pre-release for sub-dependencies if it's the only option" do
+ dep "need-pre"
+ should_resolve_as %w[need-pre-1.0.0 activesupport-3.0.0.beta1]
+ end
+
+ it "selects a pre-release if it's specified in the Gemfile" do
+ dep "activesupport", "= 3.0.0.beta"
+ dep "actionpack"
+
+ should_resolve_as %w[activesupport-3.0.0.beta actionpack-3.0.0.beta myrack-1.1 myrack-mount-0.6]
+ end
+
+ it "prefers non-pre-releases when doing conservative updates" do
+ @index = build_index do
+ gem "mail", "2.7.0"
+ gem "mail", "2.7.1.rc1"
+ gem "RubyGems\0", Gem::VERSION
+ end
+ dep "mail"
+ @locked = locked ["mail", "2.7.0"]
+ @base = locked
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:patch], [], ["mail-2.7.0"]
+ end
+
+ it "raises an exception if a child dependency is not resolved" do
+ @index = a_unresolvable_child_index
+ dep "chef_app_error"
+ expect do
+ resolve
+ end.to raise_error(Bundler::SolveFailure)
+ end
+
+ it "does not try to re-resolve including prereleases if gems involved don't have prereleases" do
+ @index = a_unresolvable_child_index
+ dep "chef_app_error"
+ expect(Bundler.ui).not_to receive(:debug).with("Retrying resolution...", any_args)
+ expect do
+ resolve
+ end.to raise_error(Bundler::SolveFailure)
+ end
+
+ it "raises an exception with the minimal set of conflicting dependencies" do
+ @index = build_index do
+ %w[0.9 1.0 2.0].each {|v| gem("a", v) }
+ gem("b", "1.0") { dep "a", ">= 2" }
+ gem("c", "1.0") { dep "a", "< 1" }
+ end
+ dep "a"
+ dep "b"
+ dep "c"
+ expect do
+ resolve
+ end.to raise_error(Bundler::SolveFailure, <<~E.strip)
+ Could not find compatible versions
+
+ Because every version of c depends on a < 1
+ and every version of b depends on a >= 2,
+ every version of c is incompatible with b >= 0.
+ So, because Gemfile depends on b >= 0
+ and Gemfile depends on c >= 0,
+ version solving has failed.
+ E
+ end
+
+ it "should throw error in case of circular dependencies" do
+ @index = a_circular_index
+ dep "circular_app"
+
+ expect do
+ Bundler::SpecSet.new(resolve).sort
+ end.to raise_error(Bundler::CyclicDependencyError, /please remove either gem 'bar' or gem 'foo'/i)
+ end
+
+ # Issue #3459
+ it "should install the latest possible version of a direct requirement with no constraints given" do
+ @index = a_complicated_index
+ dep "foo"
+ should_resolve_and_include %w[foo-3.0.5]
+ end
+
+ # Issue #3459
+ it "should install the latest possible version of a direct requirement with constraints given" do
+ @index = a_complicated_index
+ dep "foo", ">= 3.0.0"
+ should_resolve_and_include %w[foo-3.0.5]
+ end
+
+ it "takes into account required_ruby_version" do
+ @index = build_index do
+ gem "foo", "1.0.0" do
+ dep "bar", ">= 0"
+ end
+
+ gem "foo", "2.0.0" do |s|
+ dep "bar", ">= 0"
+ s.required_ruby_version = "~> 2.0.0"
+ end
+
+ gem "bar", "1.0.0"
+
+ gem "bar", "2.0.0" do |s|
+ s.required_ruby_version = "~> 2.0.0"
+ end
+
+ gem "Ruby\0", "1.8.7"
+ end
+ dep "foo"
+ dep "Ruby\0", "1.8.7"
+
+ should_resolve_and_include %w[foo-1.0.0 bar-1.0.0]
+ end
+
+ context "conservative" do
+ before :each do
+ @index = build_index do
+ gem("foo", "1.3.7") { dep "bar", "~> 2.0" }
+ gem("foo", "1.3.8") { dep "bar", "~> 2.0" }
+ gem("foo", "1.4.3") { dep "bar", "~> 2.0" }
+ gem("foo", "1.4.4") { dep "bar", "~> 2.0" }
+ gem("foo", "1.4.5") { dep "bar", "~> 2.1" }
+ gem("foo", "1.5.0") { dep "bar", "~> 2.1" }
+ gem("foo", "1.5.1") { dep "bar", "~> 3.0" }
+ gem("foo", "2.0.0") { dep "bar", "~> 3.0" }
+ gem "bar", %w[2.0.3 2.0.4 2.0.5 2.1.0 2.1.1 3.0.0]
+ end
+ dep "foo"
+
+ # base represents declared dependencies in the Gemfile that are still satisfied by the lockfile
+ @base = Bundler::SpecSet.new([])
+
+ # locked represents versions in lockfile
+ @locked = locked(%w[foo 1.4.3], %w[bar 2.0.3])
+ end
+
+ it "resolves all gems to latest patch" do
+ # strict is not set, so bar goes up a minor version due to dependency from foo 1.4.5
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include :patch, true, %w[foo-1.4.5 bar-2.1.1]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves all gems to latest patch strict" do
+ # strict is set, so foo can only go up to 1.4.4 to avoid bar going up a minor version, and bar can go up to 2.0.5
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:patch, :strict], true, %w[foo-1.4.4 bar-2.0.5]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves foo only to latest patch - same dependency case" do
+ @locked = locked(%w[foo 1.3.7], %w[bar 2.0.3])
+ # bar is locked, and the lock holds here because the dependency on bar doesn't change on the matching foo version.
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include :patch, ["foo"], %w[foo-1.3.8 bar-2.0.3]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves foo only to latest patch - changing dependency not declared case" do
+ # foo is the only gem being requested for update, therefore bar is locked, but bar is NOT
+ # declared as a dependency in the Gemfile. In this case, locks don't apply to _changing_
+ # dependencies and since the dependency of the selected foo gem changes, the latest matching
+ # dependency of "bar", "~> 2.1" -- bar-2.1.1 -- is selected. This is not a bug and follows
+ # the long-standing documented Conservative Updating behavior of bundle install.
+ # https://bundler.io/v1.12/man/bundle-install.1.html#CONSERVATIVE-UPDATING
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include :patch, ["foo"], %w[foo-1.4.5 bar-2.1.1]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves foo only to latest patch - changing dependency declared case" do
+ # bar is locked AND a declared dependency in the Gemfile, so it will not move, and therefore
+ # foo can only move up to 1.4.4.
+ @base = Bundler::SpecSet.new([Bundler::LazySpecification.new("bar", Gem::Version.new("2.0.3"), nil)])
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include :patch, ["foo"], %w[foo-1.4.4 bar-2.0.3]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves foo only to latest patch strict" do
+ # adding strict helps solve the possibly unexpected behavior of bar changing in the prior test case,
+ # because no versions will be returned for bar ~> 2.1, so the engine falls back to ~> 2.0 (turn on
+ # debugging to see this happen).
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:patch, :strict], ["foo"], %w[foo-1.4.4 bar-2.0.3]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves bar only to latest patch" do
+ # bar is locked, so foo can only go up to 1.4.4
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include :patch, ["bar"], %w[foo-1.4.3 bar-2.0.5]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves all gems to latest minor" do
+ # strict is not set, so bar goes up a major version due to dependency from foo 1.4.5
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include :minor, true, %w[foo-1.5.1 bar-3.0.0]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves all gems to latest minor strict" do
+ # strict is set, so foo can only go up to 1.5.0 to avoid bar going up a major version
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:minor, :strict], true, %w[foo-1.5.0 bar-2.1.1]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves all gems to latest major" do
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include :major, true, %w[foo-2.0.0 bar-3.0.0]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves all gems to latest major strict" do
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:major, :strict], true, %w[foo-2.0.0 bar-3.0.0]
+ end
+
+ # Why would this happen in real life? If bar 2.2 has a bug that the author of foo wants to bypass
+ # by reverting the dependency, the author of foo could release a new gem with an older requirement.
+ context "revert to previous" do
+ before :each do
+ @index = build_index do
+ gem("foo", "1.4.3") { dep "bar", "~> 2.2" }
+ gem("foo", "1.4.4") { dep "bar", "~> 2.1.0" }
+ gem("foo", "1.5.0") { dep "bar", "~> 2.0.0" }
+ gem "bar", %w[2.0.5 2.1.1 2.2.3]
+ end
+ dep "foo"
+
+ # base represents declared dependencies in the Gemfile that are still satisfied by the lockfile
+ @base = Bundler::SpecSet.new([])
+
+ # locked represents versions in lockfile
+ @locked = locked(%w[foo 1.4.3], %w[bar 2.2.3])
+ end
+
+ it "could revert to a previous version level patch" do
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include :patch, true, %w[foo-1.4.4 bar-2.1.1]
+ end
+
+ it "cannot revert to a previous version in strict mode level patch" do
+ # fall back to the locked resolution since strict means we can't regress either version
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:patch, :strict], true, %w[foo-1.4.3 bar-2.2.3]
+ end
+
+ it "could revert to a previous version level minor" do
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include :minor, true, %w[foo-1.5.0 bar-2.0.5]
+ end
+
+ it "cannot revert to a previous version in strict mode level minor" do
+ # fall back to the locked resolution since strict means we can't regress either version
+ should_conservative_resolve_and_include [:minor, :strict], true, %w[foo-1.4.3 bar-2.2.3]
+ end
+ end
+ end
+
+ it "handles versions that redundantly depend on themselves" do
+ @index = build_index do
+ gem "myrack", "3.0.0"
+
+ gem "standalone_migrations", "7.1.0" do
+ dep "myrack", "~> 2.0"
+ end
+
+ gem "standalone_migrations", "2.0.4" do
+ dep "standalone_migrations", ">= 0"
+ end
+
+ gem "standalone_migrations", "1.0.13" do
+ dep "myrack", ">= 0"
+ end
+ end
+
+ dep "myrack", "~> 3.0"
+ dep "standalone_migrations"
+
+ should_resolve_as %w[myrack-3.0.0 standalone_migrations-2.0.4]
+ end
+
+ it "ignores versions that incorrectly depend on themselves" do
+ @index = build_index do
+ gem "myrack", "3.0.0"
+
+ gem "standalone_migrations", "7.1.0" do
+ dep "myrack", "~> 2.0"
+ end
+
+ gem "standalone_migrations", "2.0.4" do
+ dep "standalone_migrations", ">= 2.0.5"
+ end
+
+ gem "standalone_migrations", "1.0.13" do
+ dep "myrack", ">= 0"
+ end
+ end
+
+ dep "myrack", "~> 3.0"
+ dep "standalone_migrations"
+
+ should_resolve_as %w[myrack-3.0.0 standalone_migrations-1.0.13]
+ end
+
+ it "does not ignore versions that incorrectly depend on themselves when dependency_api is not available" do
+ @index = build_index do
+ gem "myrack", "3.0.0"
+
+ gem "standalone_migrations", "7.1.0" do
+ dep "myrack", "~> 2.0"
+ end
+
+ gem "standalone_migrations", "2.0.4" do
+ dep "standalone_migrations", ">= 2.0.5"
+ end
+
+ gem "standalone_migrations", "1.0.13" do
+ dep "myrack", ">= 0"
+ end
+ end
+
+ dep "myrack", "~> 3.0"
+ dep "standalone_migrations"
+
+ should_resolve_without_dependency_api %w[myrack-3.0.0 standalone_migrations-2.0.4]
+ end
+
+ it "resolves fine cases that need joining unbounded disjoint ranges" do
+ @index = build_index do
+ gem "inspec", "5.22.3" do
+ dep "ruby", ">= 3.2.2"
+ dep "train-kubernetes", ">= 0.1.7"
+ end
+
+ gem "ruby", "3.2.2"
+
+ gem "train-kubernetes", "0.1.12" do
+ dep "k8s-ruby", ">= 0.14.0"
+ end
+
+ gem "train-kubernetes", "0.1.10" do
+ dep "k8s-ruby", "= 0.10.5"
+ end
+
+ gem "train-kubernetes", "0.1.7" do
+ dep "k8s-ruby", ">= 0.10.5"
+ end
+
+ gem "k8s-ruby", "0.10.5" do
+ dep "ruby","< 3.2.2"
+ end
+
+ gem "k8s-ruby", "0.11.0" do
+ dep "ruby", ">= 3.2.2"
+ end
+
+ gem "k8s-ruby", "0.14.0" do
+ dep "ruby", "< 3.2.2"
+ end
+ end
+
+ dep "inspec", "5.22.3"
+ dep "ruby", "3.2.2"
+
+ should_resolve_as %w[inspec-5.22.3 ruby-3.2.2 train-kubernetes-0.1.7 k8s-ruby-0.11.0]
+ end
+end