diff options
| author | kou <kou@b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e> | 2010-09-17 13:14:14 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | kou <kou@b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e> | 2010-09-17 13:14:14 +0000 |
| commit | 91ed484f92040e5c2006a3a00ec77a54d552cf37 (patch) | |
| tree | 03fd6677a85aaad516d0c9464b1273ea107231b7 /test/rexml/data/ofbiz-issues-full-177.xml | |
| parent | 045491d5be06b615d66d3f66cca2b5d2bc3c1929 (diff) | |
* test/rexml/: import REXML tests from
http://www.germane-software.com/repos/rexml/trunk/test/.
Many tests are failed temporary. I'll fix them quickly. Sorry.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@29282 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
Diffstat (limited to 'test/rexml/data/ofbiz-issues-full-177.xml')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/rexml/data/ofbiz-issues-full-177.xml | 13971 |
1 files changed, 13971 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/rexml/data/ofbiz-issues-full-177.xml b/test/rexml/data/ofbiz-issues-full-177.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..bfff771d12 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/rexml/data/ofbiz-issues-full-177.xml @@ -0,0 +1,13971 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> +<!DOCTYPE issuezilla [ + <!-- This DTD describes a structure that contains one or more --> + <!-- IssueZilla issues. IssueZilla is a derivative of BugZilla --> + <!-- (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org) developed for use with SourceCast --> + <!-- $Id: issuezilla.dtd 34364 2003-11-18 00:30:16Z kmaples $ --> + + <!ELEMENT issuezilla (issue+)> + + <!-- Attributes of the root element 'issuezilla': --> + <!-- --> + <!-- version : Current version of IssueZilla. --> + <!-- urlbase : Full url to source installation of issueZilla. --> + <!-- maintainer : Email address of person responsible for --> + <!-- installation usually 'webmaster@foo.com' --> + <!-- exporter : Email address of the individual performing the --> + <!-- XML export. --> + <!-- charset : The originating charset for this issue. --> + <!-- dtd_version : Version of this DTD; the cvs revision number. --> + + <!ATTLIST issuezilla version CDATA #REQUIRED> + <!ATTLIST issuezilla urlbase CDATA #REQUIRED> + <!ATTLIST issuezilla maintainer CDATA #REQUIRED> + <!ATTLIST issuezilla exporter CDATA #IMPLIED> + <!ATTLIST issuezilla charset CDATA #REQUIRED> + + <!-- Attributes of the Helm project from whence this export came: --> + + <!ATTLIST issuezilla project_domain CDATA #IMPLIED> + <!ATTLIST issuezilla project_name CDATA #IMPLIED> + <!ATTLIST issuezilla project_id CDATA #IMPLIED> + + <!-- Current cvs revision: $Revision: 1.6 $ --> + <!-- Revision above should match hardcoded value below (hard-coded --> + <!-- to facilitate development): --> + <!ATTLIST issuezilla dtd_version CDATA #FIXED "Revision: 1.2"> + + <!-- Elements comprising an issue. --> + + <!ELEMENT issue ( issue_id, (issue_status, priority, resolution, + component, version, rep_platform, assigned_to, + delta_ts, subcomponent, reporter, target_milestone?, issue_type, + creation_ts, qa_contact?, status_whiteboard?, issue_file_loc?, + votes?, op_sys, short_desc, keywords*, dependson*, blocks*, + is_duplicate?, has_duplicates*, cc*, long_desc+, attachment*, + activity* + )? + ) > + + <!-- Attribute(s) of the 'issue' element: --> + <!-- --> + <!-- status_code : Error code if issue requested is missing, or user --> + <!-- performing the operation does not have the --> + <!-- necessary role. Uses HTTP codes as defined in --> + <!-- RFC 2616; will always return a three-digit code. --> + <!-- status_message : String corresponding to status_code above. --> + + <!ATTLIST issue status_code (200|401|404) #REQUIRED> + <!ATTLIST issue status_message (OK|Unauthorized|NotFound) #REQUIRED> + + <!-- Elements of issue and their definitions: --> + <!-- --> + <!-- issue_id : ID of this issue (unique key). --> + <!-- issue_status : Current status of this issue. --> + <!-- priority : Priority (severity) assigned to issue. --> + <!-- resolution : The issue's resolution, if any --> + <!-- component : Product against which issue is reported. --> + <!-- version : Version associated with component. --> + <!-- platform : Platform issue reported against (e.g. linux, etc.).--> + <!-- assigned_to : Email of person issue currently assigned to. --> + <!-- delta_ts : Last modified timestamp ('yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss'). --> + <!-- --> + <!-- subcomponent : Component of component issue reported against. --> + <!-- reporter : Email of initial issue reporter. --> + <!-- target_milestone : Milestone for this issue's resolution. --> + <!-- issue_type : Nature of issue, e.g. defect, task, etc. --> + <!-- creation_ts : Issue creation timestamp ('yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss').--> + <!-- qa_contact : Email of the QA contact for this issue. --> + <!-- status_whiteboard: Free text 'whiteboard' for issue comments. --> + <!-- issue_file_loc : URL related to issue --> + <!-- votes : current votes for issu --> + <!-- op_sys : Operating system issue reported against. --> + <!-- short_desc : Short description of issue. --> + + <!ELEMENT issue_id (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT issue_status (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT priority (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT resolution (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT component (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT version (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT rep_platform (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT assigned_to (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT delta_ts (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT subcomponent (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT reporter (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT target_milestone (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT issue_type (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT creation_ts (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT qa_contact (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT status_whiteboard (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT issue_file_loc (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT votes (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT op_sys (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT short_desc (#PCDATA)> + + <!-- Data from the longdescs table for this issue id. Essentially --> + <!-- the log of additional comments. --> + <!-- --> + <!-- who : Email of person posting long_desc. --> + <!-- issue_when : Timestamp when long_desc added ('yyy-mm-dd hh:mm') --> + <!-- thetext : Free text that comprises the long desc. --> + + <!ELEMENT long_desc (who, issue_when, thetext)> + + <!ELEMENT who (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT issue_when (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT thetext (#PCDATA)> + + <!-- 'optional' elements. + keywords : List of keywords for this issue. + dependson : List of local issue IDs that depend on this one. + blocks : List of local issue IDs blocked by this one. + is_duplicate : The issue which this issue was closed as a + duplicate of. + has_duplicates : Other issues which were closed as a duplicate + of this issue. + cc : List of email addresses of interested parties. + + NOTE: elements of 'blocks', 'dependson', 'is_duplicate' and + 'has_duplicates' are defined elsewhere in this document. --> + + <!ELEMENT keywords (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT dependson (issue_id, who, when)> + <!ELEMENT blocks (issue_id, who, when)> + <!ELEMENT is_duplicate (issue_id, who, when)> + <!ELEMENT has_duplicates (issue_id, who, when)> + <!ELEMENT cc (#PCDATA)> + + <!-- Data pertaining to attachments. NOTE - some of these fields --> + <!-- are currently unimplemented (ispatch, filename, etc.). --> + + <!ELEMENT attachment (mimetype, attachid, date, desc, ispatch*, filename, + submitter_id, submitting_username, data, attachment_iz_url)> + + <!-- encoding : How the inline attachment is encoded. --> + + <!ATTLIST attachment encoding CDATA #FIXED "Base64" > + + <!-- mimetype : Mime type for the attachment. --> + <!-- attachid : A unique id for this attachment. --> + <!-- date : Timestamp of when added 'yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm' --> + <!-- desc : Short description for attachment. --> + <!-- ispatch : Whether attachment is a patch file. --> + <!-- filename : Filename of attachment. --> + <!-- submitter_id : Issuezilla ID of attachement submitter. --> + <!-- submitting_username : username of attachement submitter. --> + <!-- data : Encoded attachment. --> + <!-- attachment_iz_url : URL to attachment in iz. --> + + <!ELEMENT mimetype (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT attachid (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT date (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT desc (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT ispatch (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT filename (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT submitter_id (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT submitting_username (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT data (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT attachment_iz_url (#PCDATA)> + + <!-- Data pertaining to the issue's activity record. --> + + <!ELEMENT activity (user, when, field_name, field_desc, oldvalue, + newvalue)> + + <!-- user : user who performed the action --> + <!-- when : date the described change was made --> + <!-- field_name : name of db field (in fielddefs) --> + <!-- field_desc : description of the database field --> + <!-- oldvalue : value changed from --> + <!-- newvalue : value changed to --> + + <!ELEMENT user (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT when (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT field_name (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT field_desc (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT oldvalue (#PCDATA)> + <!ELEMENT newvalue (#PCDATA)> + + +]> +<issuezilla exporter="guest" charset="UTF-8" version="2.11" urlbase="https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/issues/" maintainer="owner@ofbiz.dev.java.net" project_domain="dev.java.net" project_name="ofbiz" project_id="792" dtd_version="Revision: 1.2"> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>1</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Documentation</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20030820210924</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>website</subcomponent> + <reporter>ajzeneski</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2003-08-13 22:35:10</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Website missing</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2003-08-13 22:35:10</issue_when> + <thetext>Website is missing from CVS.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2003-08-19 12:09:17</issue_when> + <thetext>Website starting to move</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2003-08-19 12:11:57</issue_when> + <thetext>Changed milestone</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2003-08-20 21:09:24</issue_when> + <thetext>Website has been imported into CVS</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2003-08-19 12:09:17</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>STARTED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2003-08-19 12:09:17</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>unspecified</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2003-08-19 12:11:57</when> + <field_name>target_milestone</field_name> + <field_desc>Target Milestone</field_desc> + <oldvalue>milestone 1</oldvalue> + <newvalue>not determined</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2003-08-20 21:09:24</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>STARTED</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2003-08-20 21:09:24</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>2</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jonesde</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20030824004146</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>ajzeneski</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2003-08-23 14:25:20</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Missing FTL</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2003-08-23 14:25:20</issue_when> + <thetext>Missing FTL file: + +Error: File not found: /feature/EditFeatureCategoryFeatures.ftl</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2003-08-24 00:41:46</issue_when> + <thetext>Converted JSP to FTL, made some small corrections.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-08-24 00:41:46</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-08-24 00:41:46</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>3</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20030828103031</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>ajzeneski</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2003-08-23 14:27:14</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Edit Promo Bug</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2003-08-23 14:27:14</issue_when> + <thetext>When editing a promo rule; the drop down for the current condition contains only +the existing condition (many times).</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2003-08-28 10:30:31</issue_when> + <thetext>#list directive had a type. Fix in CVS.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-08-28 10:30:31</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-08-28 10:30:31</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>4</issue_id> + <issue_status>VERIFIED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20030828103057</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>ajzeneski</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2003-08-23 14:30:52</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Price Rule Bug</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2003-08-23 14:30:52</issue_when> + <thetext>When editing a price rule; changing the is "sale price" flag sets properly, +however always displays "no" as the selected choice.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2003-08-28 10:20:59</issue_when> + <thetext>Fixed conditional on the no button, now appears correctly.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2003-08-28 10:30:57</issue_when> + <thetext>Done</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-08-28 10:20:59</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-08-28 10:20:59</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-08-28 10:30:57</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>RESOLVED</oldvalue> + <newvalue>VERIFIED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>5</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20030823144138</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Party</subcomponent> + <reporter>ajzeneski</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2003-08-23 14:41:38</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Relationship missing button</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2003-08-23 14:41:38</issue_when> + <thetext>View/Edit party relationships page first is still JSP and second is missing the +links to communication event(s).</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>6</issue_id> + <issue_status>CLOSED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20030918144334</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>robdawson</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2003-09-04 02:09:57</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>jonesde</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Entity Engine ConnectionFactory and DBCPConnectionFactory issues with Oracle</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>robdawson</who> + <issue_when>2003-09-04 02:09:57</issue_when> + <thetext>When using the Inline JDBC Functionality of the Entity Engine to access an Oracle +database the Entity Engine gives SQL no suitable driver exceptions. + +The fix for this involves changing: + loader.loadClass(driverClassName); +to + Class clazz = loader.loadClass(driverClassName); + clazz.newInstance(); +in both the ConnectionFactory and DBCPConnectionFactory classes. + +There will also need to be the appropriate exception handling. + +Please contact me if this requires any clarification.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2003-09-04 22:15:06</issue_when> + <thetext>The message you are getting means that the JDBC drivers for Oracle cannot be +found on the classpath. Contact the users mailing list if you need further help +with this issue.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2003-09-04 22:17:28</issue_when> + <thetext>Sorry; DBCP support is currently outdated and not used due to the fact that +there is no transaction support. It is recommended you use the JOTM/XAPool +connections. This issue will be addressed during a refactor of this class in the +coming months.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2003-09-18 14:43:34</issue_when> + <thetext> +This issue has been resolved with code changes similar to those recommended. + +HOWEVER: There is one caveat with this: I would NOT recommend running using +either of these blocks of code. Without a transaction aware connection pool +performance will be severely affected or operations may be performed outside of +transactions. So, I wouldn't use straight JDBC or DBCP right now. Hopefully in +the future DBCP will support XADataSources, then it may be an option. + +Later, +-David Jones +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2003-09-04 22:15:06</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2003-09-04 22:15:06</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-09-18 14:43:34</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>RESOLVED</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CLOSED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-09-18 14:43:34</when> + <field_name>qa_contact</field_name> + <field_desc>QA Contact</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>jonesde</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>7</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040304194045</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>WebTools</subcomponent> + <reporter>fzhu_genshare</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2003-09-21 07:35:08</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc>http://localhost:8080/webtools/control/view/ModelGroupWriter?savetofile=true</issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>"Save Entity Group XML to File" error</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <has_duplicates> + <issue_id>8</issue_id> + <who>jonesde</who> + <when>2003-11-04 01:04:02</when> + </has_duplicates> + <long_desc> + <who>fzhu_genshare</who> + <issue_when>2003-09-21 07:35:08</issue_when> + <thetext>If click "Save Entity Group XML to File" on the webtools, the new page opens and +the following error message appears: + +org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP + +An error occurred at line: -1 in the jsp file: null + +Generated servlet error: +[javac] Since fork is true, ignoring compiler setting. +[javac] Compiling 1 source file +[javac] Since fork is true, ignoring compiler setting. +[javac] C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1 +\Temp\Jetty_0_0_0_0_8080__webtools\entity\ModelGroupWriter_jsp.java:72: +cannot resolve symbol +[javac] symbol : variable entityGroupResourceHandler +[javac] location: class org.ofbiz.entity.model.ModelGroupReader +[javac] ResourceHandler resourceHandler = +modelGroupReader.entityGroupResourceHandler; +[javac] ^ +[javac] 1 error</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2003-11-04 01:04:02</issue_when> + <thetext>*** Issue 8 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-04 19:40:45</issue_when> + <thetext>lower priority</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-04 19:40:45</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P4</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>8</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20031104010402</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>WebTools</subcomponent> + <reporter>fzhu_genshare</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2003-09-21 07:40:53</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc>http://localhost:8080/webtools/control/view/ModelGroupWriter</issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>"Generate Entity Group XML" error</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <is_duplicate> + <issue_id>7</issue_id> + <who>jonesde</who> + <when>2003-11-04 01:04:02</when> + </is_duplicate> + <long_desc> + <who>fzhu_genshare</who> + <issue_when>2003-09-21 07:40:53</issue_when> + <thetext>If clicked "Generate Entity Group XML" on webtools, an error message occurs: + +org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP + +An error occurred at line: -1 in the jsp file: null + +Generated servlet error: +[javac] Since fork is true, ignoring compiler setting. +[javac] Compiling 1 source file +[javac] Since fork is true, ignoring compiler setting. +[javac] C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1 +\Temp\Jetty_0_0_0_0_8080__webtools\entity\ModelGroupWriter_jsp.java:72: +cannot resolve symbol +[javac] symbol : variable entityGroupResourceHandler +[javac] location: class org.ofbiz.entity.model.ModelGroupReader +[javac] ResourceHandler resourceHandler = +modelGroupReader.entityGroupResourceHandler; +[javac] ^ +[javac] 1 error + +It seems the class ResourceHandler is missing. The same error result in several +links of webtools concerning entity engine xml export broken.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2003-11-04 01:04:02</issue_when> + <thetext>This issue is a duplicate of #7, they may be different links but they hit the same +request and code. + +*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 7 ***</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-11-04 01:04:02</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-11-04 01:04:02</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>DUPLICATE</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>9</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040223211140</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>byersa</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2003-10-28 09:27:31</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>GenericEntity.getBytes fails with HSQLDB</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>byersa</who> + <issue_when>2003-10-28 09:27:31</issue_when> + <thetext>getBytes internally casts to ByteWrapper which causes a ClassCastException. +Casting directly to byte[] seems to work. + +Don't know if it fails with other dbs.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-23 21:11:40</issue_when> + <thetext>This does not appear to be something that can be fixed in OFBiz, it appears to be a bug in HSQLDB, and +only in certain versions. Trying it with an earlier version it worked, but various other things didn't. We +may just have to be patient until HSQLDB has another stable release.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-23 21:11:40</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-23 21:11:40</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>WONTFIX</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>10</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P5</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040630193003</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Service</subcomponent> + <reporter>byersa</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2003-10-31 08:53:59</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>missing or incorrect service parameter message</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>byersa</who> + <issue_when>2003-10-31 08:53:59</issue_when> + <thetext>If possible, I think it would be very helpful to developers if the message that +informs on invalid service parameter conditions would clearly indicate whether +it is in the IN or OUT mode that the problem is occurring.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 12:17:42</issue_when> + <thetext>changed to enhancement</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 17:49:18</issue_when> + <thetext>reassigned</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-30 19:30:03</issue_when> + <thetext>The ServiceValidationException has been updated to support missing and extra fields as well as +knowing which "mode" (IN/OUT) the error occured in.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 12:17:42</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>DEFECT</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 12:17:42</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P5</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 17:49:17</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:30:03</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:30:03</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>11</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jonesde</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20031104002629</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Content</subcomponent> + <reporter>cyf</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2003-11-03 22:26:18</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>Windows 2000</op_sys> + <short_desc>"response.sendRedirect" in jsp could not take effect</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>cyf</who> + <issue_when>2003-11-03 22:26:18</issue_when> + <thetext>I have write a test.jsp code(like): +..... +hello world! +<%response.sendRedirect("control/main");%> +.... + +define : +in controller.xml: +<request-map uri="test" edit="true"> + <response name="success" type="view" value="test"/> + <response name="error" type="view" value="error"/> +</request-map> +..... +<view-map name="test" type="region"/> + +in region also configued + +when I test the page : +it's appear "hello world!",but didn't redirect. + +When I use this code as jsp page in normal web app,redirect can take effect. + +I think this is a bug of in region process.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2003-11-04 00:26:29</issue_when> + <thetext> +If I understand your complaint correctly it is because the way you organized +things the response output stream is committed before the sendRedirect is +called. There is absolutely nothing that can be done about this. + +If you want to send a redirect you should do so in an event or a non-region view +(and non-jpublish for that matter). Those composite view tools are meant for +generating views and involve templates that may cause the response to be +committed before you wrapped view is even called. + +BTW, this may be more appropriate as a question on the users list, not as a defect +bug report. + +Later, +-David Jones</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-11-04 00:26:29</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-11-04 00:26:29</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>12</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040223213513</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>quake_wang</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2003-11-04 01:39:16</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>entity cache is not synchronized with DB</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>quake_wang</who> + <issue_when>2003-11-04 01:39:16</issue_when> + <thetext>Quake, + +It might make sense to have an issue created on the ofbiz.dev.java.net +site that covers this problem, since it may take some time to resolve. +Could you create one there? It could just include text from messages +send back and forth in this email thread. + +Thanks, +-David + +On Nov 3, 2003, at 6:57 PM, Quake_Wang wrote: + +> The immutable flag can solve some cache synchronize issues, it will +> help for debugging. But, please consider this scenario: +> +> Service A: +> OK, now base on policy: "NEVER read from the cache if you are planning +> on updating", we directly read from DB, +> order = findByPK ("Order", 10000); +> order.set("status", "DEF"); +> order.store(); +> +> +> Service B: +> order = findByPKCache("Order", 10000); +> just query, do not change any fields, entity engine will put the order +> 10000 with "DEF" status in cache, after some other operations (not on +> the order generic value) throw exception, rolled back service A and B, +> then PKCache is not synchronized with DB too, the immutable flag can +> not help any...... +> +> You wrote a service using cache for better performance, and someone +> may assembly your service in same transaction (group service, ECA +> service), the synchronizing may broken, it's really hard to find such +> problem. +> +> Any ideas? +> +> Quake +> +> -----Original Message----- +> From: David Jones [mailto:jonesde@ofbiz.org] +> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:05 PM +> To: dev@ofbiz.dev.java.net +> Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Dev - Important - [Bug] PKCache is not +> synchronized +> with DB +> +> +> +> Because of the possibility that this is happening and causing +> previously unexplained problems, I decided to go ahead and implement +> the immutable feature on the GenericEntity. This is now in CVS, but may +> cause problems with current code (and will most likely in many cases). +> Do disable this just comment out the line near the beginning of the set +> method in GenericEntity.java. It is around line 248 in the current +> revision of the file. +> +> I fixed a few places that had this problem, including createCustomer in +> ecommerce and the userLogin service. Creating a new customer and going +> through the checkout process works fine now, but variations on the way +> I did it may break. +> +> If we have too many problems with this, I'm okay with disabling it +> temporarily, but it would be nice to go this direction in the future. +> It will help resolve the possibility that strange things happen because +> things are being changed in the cache when they shouldn't be and the +> cache is out of sync with the database, ie is dirty. +> +> Feel free to report bugs along these lines, or better yet send +> patches... +> +> Later, +> -David +> +> +> On Nov 3, 2003, at 5:24 AM, David Jones wrote: +> +>> +>> Quake, +>> +>> Yes, I know this is a problem, although I had forgotten about it since +>> it hasn't come up for a long time. +>> +>> Our official answer on this, related to the use of the cache in +>> general is: NEVER read from the cache if you are planning on updating +>> something. It's tempting to change the GenericValue object to have an +>> unchangeable flag that is set for all versions that go into the +>> cache.... +>> +>> I agree with you, there doesn't seem to be an easy way to +>> automatically clear the cache on a rollback. In most cases the +>> rollback doesn't even go through the Entity Engine, it is done in +>> external code. So, the Entity Engine never gets a notification of the +>> rollback, and if it did it would have to remember every operation that +>> happened during that transaction so it could clear those dirty cache +>> entries. +>> +>> Thus the policy: never use the cache to read when you are planning on +>> writing to the database. And yeah, maybe I should throw some code in +>> there to enforce this... Any thoughts from anyone on that? +>> +>> Later, +>> -David +>> +>> +>> +>> On Nov 3, 2003, at 4:45 AM, Quake_Wang wrote: +>> +>>> Found a bug in the PKCache, below is the scenario +>>> +>>> Service A: +>>> 1. find an order with the order No. 10000, dummy code: +>>> order = findByPKCache("Order", 10000); +>>> assume we get an order with the status "ABC"; +>>> +>>> 2. set the order status to "DEF" and store, dummy code: +>>> order.set("status", "DEF"); +>>> order.store(); +>>> +>>> Service B: +>>> 1. find order 10000 again, dummy code: +>>> order = findByPKCache("Order", 10000); +>>> If the service A and B are in the same transaction (ex, group service +>>> or ECA service), entity engine will get the order with "DEF" status +>>> and put it in the PK cache. +>>> +>>> 2. some other operations, throw exception +>>> Service A and B are rolled back, as the result, the PKCache is not +>>> synchronized with DB: +>>> DB: order 10000, status "ABC" +>>> PKCache: order 10000, status "DEF" +>>> +>>> I spent some time to trace this bug, but can not find an easy way to +>>> fix it, just simply change the findByPKCache to findByPK in service +>>> B. +>>> I'm sending out this email in hopes of helping who may encounter the +>>> same problem and receiving a better fix method. +>>> +>>> Regards +>>> Quake +>>> +>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- +>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ofbiz.dev.java.net +>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ofbiz.dev.java.net +>> +>> +>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- +>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ofbiz.dev.java.net +>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ofbiz.dev.java.net +> +> +> --------------------------------------------------------------------- +> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ofbiz.dev.java.net +> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ofbiz.dev.java.net +> +> +> --------------------------------------------------------------------- +> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ofbiz.dev.java.net +> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ofbiz.dev.java.net + + +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ofbiz.dev.java.net +For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ofbiz.dev.java.net</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-23 21:35:13</issue_when> + <thetext> +Just a note on this. To fix it there need to be ThreadLocal caches that are maintained by a class that +implements the Synchronization interface for transactions. The idea would be that cache reads look in +the ThreadLocal cache first, then in the global cache, cache writes put everything in the ThreadLocal +cache and when the transaction is committed all ThreadLocal cache entries go into the global cache. +-David</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>13</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20031112065558</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>byersa</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2003-11-12 06:15:27</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>setNonPKFields</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>byersa</who> + <issue_when>2003-11-12 06:15:27</issue_when> + <thetext>I had a situation in which I used setNonPKFields to populate an entity that had +createdData and lastModifiedDate from parameters thinking that it would be a +sort of parameter map. My intention was to then add the individual fields to a +service input, but it turns out that instead of converting the date string to +DateTime format, it kept them as strings and the service complained. I guess the +GenericValue only converts datatypes during the persistence phase? If that is +the case, it would be useful if it converted up loading.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2003-11-12 06:55:58</issue_when> + <thetext>This is really not the responsibility of the GenericValue object (or really the +GenericEntity object). This is difficult to handle as a defect report and should +be sent to the dev mailing for discussion of the best way to go about what you +are trying to do. The email message should perhaps include more detail about the +overall goal you are trying to accomplish. Note that the GenericEntity, at the +moment, does not enforce types going in, but may be changed to do that and throw +an exception if the type is wrong. -David</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-11-12 06:55:58</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2003-11-12 06:55:58</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>14</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>Macintosh</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040107162053</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>jonesde</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-01-07 16:20:53</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Order Summary pages don't show free shipping promo</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-01-07 16:20:53</issue_when> + <thetext>Here is a description from Si Chen who reported the problem: + +One thing that I noticed that is anomalous, though, is that the order review +pages still show an estimate for shipping charges, even though the customer +should get free shipping. It seems that the checkout review pages are using +org.ofbiz.order.shoppingcart.shipping.ShippingEvents.getShipEstimate, while on +actual checkout it is using +org.ofbiz.order.order.OrderReadHelper.getShippingTotal. + +The former is not taking into account shipping adjustments.</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>15</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040210064750</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>nowpulse</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-10 01:36:16</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Order Stats showing incorrect YTD info</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>nowpulse</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-10 01:36:16</issue_when> + <thetext>The YTD info is incorrect since the Java month starts at 0 instead of 1. + +ofbiz/components/order/webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/order/orderstats.bsh +On Line 71 the 1 should be replaced with a 0 + +cal.set(Calendar.MONTH, 0); + +thank you, +sterling</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-10 06:47:50</issue_when> + <thetext>Fixed as recommended.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-10 06:47:50</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-10 06:47:50</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>16</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jonesde</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040527233859</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jonesde</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-24 02:56:29</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Limit Categories Shown in Drop Downs</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-24 02:56:29</issue_when> + <thetext>Add "show in drop-down" option ProductCategory, filter by it in all combo style category drop downs, +and change existing category drop-downs to be combo-boxes, include those on the EditProduct, +EditProductCategories, EditCategory, EditCategoryProducts, EditPromoRules pages.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-27 23:38:59</issue_when> + <thetext>Some progress has been made on this, but something still needs to be done with the form tool, etc to +limit the drop downs.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 11:59:21</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-27 23:38:59</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P1</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P4</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>17</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P1</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jonesde</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120731</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jonesde</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-24 02:58:45</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Filter Promotion Products to exclude discontinued</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-24 02:58:45</issue_when> + <thetext>Add code to the ProductPromoWorker to (perhaps optionally) filter products included by the +salesDiscontinuationDate, and of course make sure the category member from/thru dates are being +honored.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-25 21:00:44</issue_when> + <thetext>Now implemented.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-25 21:00:44</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-25 21:00:44</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:07:31</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>18</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P1</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jonesde</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120740</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jonesde</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-24 03:01:49</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Back ordered, or insufficient quantities not handled right</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-24 03:01:49</issue_when> + <thetext>It appears that when a product is back-ordered, or reserved in excess of the AvailableToPromise the +calculations and setting of values are messed up. + +Here is a report on this from Bryce Ewing on Feb 5th, 2004: + +================================================= +I have found something that appears to be a bug (but I am not totally sure), I will explain this in two +cases below: + +case 1: buy 1 item of product1 with no inventory + - inventory item created with 0 on hand, and -1 available to promise + - order item inventory res created with quantity of 1 and quantity not available of 1 + +case 2: buy 2 items of product2 with 1 item in inventory + - inventory item updated with 1 on hand, and -1 available to promise + - order item inventory res created with quantity of 2 and quantity not available of 0 + +For case 1 the system is doing exactly what I would expect, but in case 2 I would have expected that +the order item inventory res record would have had a quantity not available of 1 rather than 0. + +Am I mistaken in this expectation, or is this infact a bug? +================================================= + +Here is a comment on some apparently related findings by Jacopo Cappellato: + +================================================= +I'm studying the simple method InventoryServices.reserveProductInventory +that implements the inventory reservation of on order/order item, and I've +got a question about this issue. +What is the meaning of the quantityNotAvailable field in +OrderItemInventoryRes entity? Where and how is it used (or intended to be +used for)? I've noticed that this quantity is considered in the pick list +reports... + +Probably the quantityNotAvailable field should contain the quantity reserved +that caused inventory item's atp to be less than zero: if so, why in the +reserveProductInventory method the quantityNotAvailable is set only in line +498 and not also after line 458? And in which way, once set, could this +quantity return to zero? +=================================================</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-24 18:35:45</issue_when> + <thetext>After a patch from Bryce Ewing it appears to be fixed.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-24 18:35:45</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-24 18:35:45</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:07:40</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>19</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120748</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-24 06:44:51</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Patch for bug in the Inventory Receive function</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-24 06:44:51</issue_when> + <thetext>In Facility manager, when you receive a purchase order delivered with more than +one shipments and you select to receive only one shipment the proposed +quantities are the quantities of the original purchase order and not the +quantities of the shipment. +In my patches I tried to change the minimum amount of code and the +result is that the code is not well written... obviously feel free to change +my code. +PS: I submitted this patches to the dev list in january 2004. +PPS: the two patches are in Unified Output Format + + +Index: ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/inventory/receiveInventory.ftl +=================================================================== +RCS +file: /cvs/ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/inventory/receiveInventory.f +tl,v +retrieving revision 1.5 +diff -u -r1.5 receiveInventory.ftl +--- ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/inventory/receiveInventory.ftl + 17 Dec 2003 22:46:36 -0000 1.5 ++++ ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/inventory/receiveInventory.ftl + 14 Jan 2004 11:05:06 -0000 +@@ -312,6 +312,9 @@ + </tr> + <#list purchaseOrderItems as orderItem> + <#assign defaultQuantity = orderItem.quantity - receivedQuantities +[orderItem.orderItemSeqId]?double> ++ <#if shipment?has_content> ++ <#assign defaultQuantity = shippedQuantities +[orderItem.orderItemSeqId]?double - receivedQuantities +[orderItem.orderItemSeqId]?double> ++ </#if> + <#if 0 < defaultQuantity> + <#assign orderItemType = orderItem.getRelatedOne("OrderItemType")> + <input type="hidden" name="orderId_o_${rowCount}" +value="${orderItem.orderId}"> + + + + + + + +Index: ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh +=================================================================== +RCS file: /cvs/ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh,v +retrieving revision 1.4 +diff -u -r1.4 receiveInventory.bsh +--- ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh 25 Aug 2003 15:28:00 -0000 + 1.4 ++++ ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh 14 Jan 2004 11:08:14 -0000 +@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ + shipment = delegator.findByPrimaryKey("Shipment", UtilMisc.toMap +("shipmentId", shipmentId)); + } + ++shippedQuantities = new HashMap(); + purchaseOrderItems = null; + if (purchaseOrder != null) { + if (product != null) { +@@ -80,14 +81,18 @@ + exprs = new ArrayList(); + while (issueIter.hasNext()) { + issuance = issueIter.next(); +- exprs.add(new EntityExpr("orderItemSeqId", EntityOperator.EQUALS, +issuance.getString("orderItemSeqId"))); ++ exprs.add(new EntityExpr("orderItemSeqId", EntityOperator.EQUALS, +issuance.getString("orderItemSeqId"))); ++ double issuanceQty = issuance.getDouble("quantity").doubleValue(); ++ if (shippedQuantities.containsKey(issuance.getString +("orderItemSeqId"))) { ++ issuanceQty += ((Double)shippedQuantities.get +(issuance.getString("orderItemSeqId"))).doubleValue(); ++ } ++ shippedQuantities.put(issuance.getString("orderItemSeqId"), +issuanceQty); + } + purchaseOrderItems = EntityUtil.filterByOr(orderItems, exprs); + } else { + purchaseOrderItems = purchaseOrder.getRelated("OrderItem"); + } + } +- + receivedQuantities = new HashMap(); + if (purchaseOrderItems != null && purchaseOrderItems.size() > 0) { + context.put("firstOrderItem", EntityUtil.getFirst(purchaseOrderItems)); +@@ -100,7 +105,13 @@ + if (receipts != null && receipts.size() > 0) { + recIter = receipts.iterator(); + while (recIter.hasNext()) { +- rec = recIter.next(); ++ rec = recIter.next(); ++ if (shipment != null) { ++ if (rec.getString("shipmentId") == null || ++ !rec.getString("shipmentId").equals(shipment.getString +("shipmentId"))) { ++ continue; ++ } ++ } + accepted = rec.getDouble("quantityAccepted"); + rejected = rec.getDouble("quantityRejected"); + if (accepted != null) +@@ -140,6 +151,7 @@ + context.put("product", product); + context.put("shipments", shipments); + context.put("shipment", shipment); ++context.put("shippedQuantities", shippedQuantities); + context.put("purchaseOrderItems", purchaseOrderItems); + context.put("receivedQuantities", receivedQuantities); + context.put("rejectReasons", rejectReasons);</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-24 06:55:45</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=1) +Patch files in UOF for receiveInventory,bsh and receiveInventory.ftl +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-01 06:35:22</issue_when> + <thetext>The changes are in CVS. Thanks Jacopo!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>1</attachid> + <date>2004-02-24 06:55:45</date> + <desc>Patch files in UOF for receiveInventory,bsh and receiveInventory.ftl</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>receiveInventory.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/1/receiveInventory.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-02-24 06:55:45</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=1) +Patch files in UOF for receiveInventory,bsh and receiveInventory.ftl +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 06:35:22</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 06:35:22</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:07:48</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>20</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120758</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Party</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-24 07:36:49</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>List All Visits link in the Party Profile page returns an error with 0 visits</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-24 07:36:50</issue_when> + <thetext>List All Visits link in the Party Profile page returns an error with 0 visits +(see attached patch file) due to wrong bsh code.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-24 07:38:20</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=2) +Patch for bug in uof +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-01 06:39:57</issue_when> + <thetext>The changes are in CVS. Thanks Jacopo!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>2</attachid> + <date>2004-02-24 07:38:20</date> + <desc>Patch for bug in uof</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>showvisits.bsh.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/2/showvisits.bsh.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-02-24 07:38:20</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=2) +Patch for bug in uof +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 06:39:57</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 06:39:57</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:07:58</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>21</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120807</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Party</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-24 07:40:56</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>findparty page returns JavaScript errors when clicking on the LookupParty link and when the lookup fields are hidden</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-24 07:40:56</issue_when> + <thetext>findparty page returns JavaScript errors when clicking on the LookupParty link +and when the lookup fields are hidden. The attached patch should fix the +problem.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-24 07:41:29</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=3) +Patch for bug in uof +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-01 06:44:01</issue_when> + <thetext>Your changes are in CVS. Thanks Jacopo!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>3</attachid> + <date>2004-02-24 07:41:29</date> + <desc>Patch for bug in uof</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>findparty.ftl.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/3/findparty.ftl.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-02-24 07:41:29</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=3) +Patch for bug in uof +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 06:44:01</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 06:44:01</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:08:07</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>22</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318115951</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-24 08:52:07</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Errors in order entry when "Payment Already Received" type is selected.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-24 08:52:08</issue_when> + <thetext>In Order Entry: +when you finalize an order and, in the "Order Entry Payment +Settings" page, you select the "Payment Already Received" type, in the +following page you get JavaScript errors when you click over +the links (stating that the object "document.billsetupform" doesn't exist); +and so you cannot submit the order.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 07:08:20</issue_when> + <thetext> +This has been an issue for a while now. It's good to have it in the tracking system since it may not get +fixed right away. Andy is more aware of what is happening there than I am, so he may have more +feedback on it. -David</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-26 07:08:20</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-26 07:08:20</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P2</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P3</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 11:59:51</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>23</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120006</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-24 08:56:40</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Inventory receive ignores the inventory item id field.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-24 08:56:40</issue_when> + <thetext>In Facility Manager -> Inventory receive: +it always creates a new inventory item even if the "inventory item id" optional +field is filled with an existing inventory item id.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 17:38:11</issue_when> + <thetext>reassigned</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 17:38:11</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:00:06</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>24</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120024</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-24 09:01:59</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Receive return: it always creates serialized inventory items.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-24 09:01:59</issue_when> + <thetext>In Facility Manager -->Receive return + +it always creates a serialized inventory item (even if 'non-serialized' is +selected) and so the received quantities are lost (if more than one).</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 17:38:55</issue_when> + <thetext>reassigned</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 17:38:55</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:00:24</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>25</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120814</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Accounting</subcomponent> + <reporter>jonesde</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-25 14:58:53</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Permission Checks missing in various part of Accounting Manager</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-25 14:58:53</issue_when> + <thetext>Various pages in the Accounting Manager have no view permission checking, including the billing +account, invoice, etc pages.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jaz</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-25 15:36:03</issue_when> + <thetext>I'm not involved in this project.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-25 16:13:54</issue_when> + <thetext> +Fixed assigned to mistake.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 10:48:28</issue_when> + <thetext>All components have a default VIEW permission based on the component configuration. Each page no +longer needs to have the added code as long as require auth is set in the controller.xml file. The +checkLogin event will make sure the user has the default permission for the specific component. +Additional permissions are only necessary when not using the default permission.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jaz</user> + <when>2004-02-25 15:36:03</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>jaz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>jonesde</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-25 16:13:54</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>jonesde</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 10:48:28</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 10:48:28</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:08:14</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>26</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040308115822</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>jonesde</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-25 21:11:36</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Billing Account Errors</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-25 21:11:36</issue_when> + <thetext>This issue was reported by Si Chen, Olivier Heintz, and some others. + +The following is some text from an email fro Si Chen on Jan 26, 2004; the attached patch is also from +this email. + +======================================= +Hello. After some work we have tracked down the problem with using +billingAccount in the order manager and were able to fix it. The +problem is stated in the order manager's billsettings.ftl, it was +passing in "EXT_BILLACT|10000" for the checkoutPaymentId instead of +separate checkoutPaymentId and billingAccountId. Olivier had suggested +a good patch earlier which parses this form of checkoutPaymentId in the +CheckOutEvents.java. We took a different approach and used code from +ecommerce to pass both checkoutPaymentId and billingAccountId. We also +fixed CheckOutEvents.java to get the billingAccountId from the request +and associate it with the cart. Both are shown in the attached patch. + +One last problem: in ecommerce, in checkoutpayment.ftl, gift cards, +credit cards, and billing accounts are all using "amount_<account_id>" +as the name of the input fields. As a result, when the +toggleBillingAccount javascript function tries to toggle the billing +account selected for entering the amount to pay, it gets confused and +cannot do this. As a result, when you use the multi-page rather than +express checkout in ecommerce, it does not work properly. I'll be happy +to elaborate on this if you need me to. +=======================================</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-25 21:14:01</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=4) +Patch to fix BillingAccount issues +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 11:58:22</issue_when> + <thetext>Applied patch; fixed JS in ecommerce </thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>4</attachid> + <date>2004-02-25 21:14:01</date> + <desc>Patch to fix BillingAccount issues</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>BillingAccountError.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>3</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jonesde</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/4/BillingAccountError.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-25 21:14:01</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=4) +Patch to fix BillingAccount issues +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 11:58:22</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 11:58:22</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 11:58:22</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>27</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120822</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>WorkEffort</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-26 03:20:00</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Patch for missing pagedef file for popup template that causes lookup error (due to i18n changes)</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 03:20:00</issue_when> + <thetext>The lookup link in New Event -> Parties page is broken. +The popup template doesn't run the envsetup script that loads the localized +labels. + +PATCH: add a file named "popup.xml" to the template folder containing the +following lines: + +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> +<page> + <template-action name="/includes/envsetup.bsh"/> +</page></thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-01 07:16:55</issue_when> + <thetext> +I have added the popup.xml file to CVS. Thanks for sending it over Jacopo.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 07:16:55</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 07:16:55</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:08:22</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>28</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040806161040</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>WorkEffort</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-26 03:32:11</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Added lookup link for parties in month view</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 03:32:11</issue_when> + <thetext>Added lookup link for parties in month view. +All the stuff was already in place... I just added the link. +However I think this is a very useful enhancement.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 03:32:44</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=5) +Patch in UOF +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-03 08:10:20</issue_when> + <thetext>Changed issue type as per email from Jacopo.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-06 16:10:40</issue_when> + <thetext>Thanks Jacopo, this is now in CVS.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>5</attachid> + <date>2004-02-26 03:32:44</date> + <desc>Patch in UOF</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>month.ftl.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/5/month.ftl.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-02-26 03:32:44</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=5) +Patch in UOF +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-03 08:10:20</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>ENHANCEMENT</oldvalue> + <newvalue>PATCH</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:00:44</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-08-06 16:10:40</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-08-06 16:10:40</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>29</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120831</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>WorkEffort</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-26 03:56:48</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>When creating a new event from calendar, start and end date were not filled properly in the form</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 03:56:48</issue_when> + <thetext>When creating a new event from calendar, start and end date were not filled +properly in the event form. +The two patches (one for the event.ftl file and one for the event.bsh file) +will solve this problem.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 03:59:24</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=6) +Patch for event.bsh in UOF +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 03:59:58</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=7) +Patch for event.ftl file in UOF +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-01 07:28:02</issue_when> + <thetext>Your changes are in CVS, thanks Jacopo!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>6</attachid> + <date>2004-02-26 03:59:24</date> + <desc>Patch for event.bsh in UOF</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>event.bsh.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/6/event.bsh.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>7</attachid> + <date>2004-02-26 03:59:58</date> + <desc>Patch for event.ftl file in UOF</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>event.ftl.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/7/event.ftl.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-02-26 03:59:24</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=6) +Patch for event.bsh in UOF +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-02-26 03:59:58</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=7) +Patch for event.ftl file in UOF +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 07:28:02</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 07:28:02</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:08:31</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>30</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P5</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040308175050</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>jackhung</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-26 04:17:49</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Fail to approval order</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jackhung</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 04:17:49</issue_when> + <thetext>19285437[ ControlServlet.java:133:DEBUG] [[[updateactivityassign] Servlet +Starting, doing setup- total:0.0,since last(Begin):0.0]] +19285438[ ControlServlet.java:182:DEBUG] [[[updateactivityassign] Setup +done, doing Event(s) and View(s)- total:0.0,since last([updateactivityas...):0.0]] +19285440[ RequestHandler.java:200:INFO ] [Processing Request]: +updateactivityassign +19285744[ WfProcessMgrImpl.java:106:INFO ] [WfProcessMgr.init] : Create +process manager (org.ofbiz.order[20030730144901] / ProcessOrder[20030730144901]) +19285890[ BshUtil.java:75 :ERROR] BSH Evaluation error. +Sourced file: <Inline eval of: approvalCode.equals("0"); > : Attempt to resolve +method: equals() on undefined variable or class name: approvalCode : at Line: 1 +: in file: <Inline eval of: approvalCode.equals("0"); > : approvalCode .equals ( +"0" ) + + at bsh.UtilEvalError.toEvalError(UtilEvalError.java:82) + at bsh.UtilEvalError.toEvalError(UtilEvalError.java:87) + at bsh.BSHMethodInvocation.eval(BSHMethodInvocation.java:79) + at bsh.BSHPrimaryExpression.eval(BSHPrimaryExpression.java:69) + at bsh.Interpreter.evalParsedScript(Interpreter.java:1104) + at bsh.Interpreter.eval(Interpreter.java:590) + at bsh.Interpreter.eval(Interpreter.java:616) + at bsh.Interpreter.eval(Interpreter.java:606) + at org.ofbiz.base.util.BshUtil.eval(BshUtil.java:64) + at +org.ofbiz.workflow.impl.WfExecutionObjectImpl.evalBshCondition(WfExecutionObjectImpl.java:718) + at +org.ofbiz.workflow.impl.WfProcessImpl.getTransFrom(WfProcessImpl.java:477) + at org.ofbiz.workflow.impl.WfProcessImpl.queueNext(WfProcessImpl.java:298) + at +org.ofbiz.workflow.impl.WfProcessImpl.activityComplete(WfProcessImpl.java:286) + at org.ofbiz.workflow.impl.WfActivityImpl.complete(WfActivityImpl.java:408) + at +org.ofbiz.workflow.impl.WfAssignmentImpl.complete(WfAssignmentImpl.java:175) + at +org.ofbiz.workflow.client.WorkflowClient.complete(WorkflowClient.java:266) + at +org.ofbiz.workflow.client.WorkflowServices.completeAssignment(WorkflowServices.java:418)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 12:08:46</issue_when> + <thetext>I cannot duplicate this problem; please provide more information or we will have to close this has no +longer an issue.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 17:50:50</issue_when> + <thetext>reassigned</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 12:08:46</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>STARTED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 12:08:46</when> + <field_name>op_sys</field_name> + <field_desc>OS/Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Linux</oldvalue> + <newvalue>All</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 12:08:46</when> + <field_name>rep_platform</field_name> + <field_desc>Platform</field_desc> + <oldvalue>PC</oldvalue> + <newvalue>All</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 12:08:46</when> + <field_name>short_desc</field_name> + <field_desc>Summary</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Fail to approval order </oldvalue> + <newvalue>Fail to approval order</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 17:50:50</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 17:50:50</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>STARTED</oldvalue> + <newvalue>NEW</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 17:50:50</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P2</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P5</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>31</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120101</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>WorkEffort</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-26 05:39:36</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Error message when you try to create new contact information under an event</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 05:39:36</issue_when> + <thetext>An error message is returned when you try to create new contact information +under an event: Cannot locate service by name (createWorkEffortContactMech) + +This is the complete message: + +ERROR: Could not complete the Create an email address for WorkEffort process +[problem invoking the [createWorkEffortContactMech] service with the map named +[context] containing [{locale=en_US, infoString=foo@bar.com, userLogin= +[GenericEntity:UserLogin][partyId,admin(java.lang.String)][disabledDateTime,null +()][passwordHint,null()][createdTxStamp,null()][successiveFailedLogins,null()] +[enabled,Y(java.lang.String)][userLoginId,admin(java.lang.String)] +[currentPassword,ofbiz(java.lang.String)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,null()] +[lastUpdatedStamp,null()][createdStamp,null()], workEffortId=10030, +contactMechTypeId=EMAIL_ADDRESS}]: Cannot locate service by name +(createWorkEffortContactMech)]</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:01:01</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>32</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040409054533</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>WorkEffort</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-26 05:50:01</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Errors that prevent adding a new phase to a project.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 05:50:01</issue_when> + <thetext>It's impossible to add a new phase to a project. Even if you fill all the +fields of the new phase form when you press the 'create' button you get an +error in the system log (however no error messages are shown in the html page). + +This is the complete error message: + +1160388[ ServiceDispatcher.java:309:ERROR] Service Error [createPhase]: ERROR: +Could not complete the Create Project Phase process [problem creating the newEnt +ity value: while inserting: [GenericEntity:WorkEffortAssoc][createdTxStamp,2004- +02-26 14:44:26.096(java.sql.Timestamp)][workEffortIdTo,10034(java.lang.String)][ +workEffortIdFrom,10031(java.lang.String)][workEffortAssocTypeId,WORK_EFF_BREAKDO +WN(java.lang.String)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2004-02-26 14:44:26.096(java.sql.Timest +amp)][createdStamp,2004-02-26 14:44:26.106(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedStamp +,2004-02-26 14:44:26.106(java.sql.Timestamp)] (SQL Exception while executing the + following:INSERT INTO WORK_EFFORT_ASSOC (WORK_EFFORT_ID_FROM, WORK_EFFORT_ID_TO +, WORK_EFFORT_ASSOC_TYPE_ID, SEQUENCE_NUM, FROM_DATE, THRU_DATE, LAST_UPDATED_ST +AMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, + ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) ([-5005] (at 124): Missing non-NULL value))]</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-09 05:45:33</issue_when> + <thetext>David Jones has fixed this problem in date 2004-04-08 (see the +thread "createphase ERROR in OFBiz 3.0 and OFBiz CVS versions" in the dev-list). +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:01:18</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-04-09 05:45:33</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-04-09 05:45:33</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>33</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20050209023142</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>WorkEffort</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-26 06:00:26</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>When you create a new request and you don't fill correctly all the fields no error messages are shown</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 06:00:26</issue_when> + <thetext>When you create a new request and you don't fill correctly all the fields no +error messages are shown.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2005-02-09 02:31:42</issue_when> + <thetext>Fixed after the refactoring to screen widget.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:01:30</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2005-02-09 02:31:42</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2005-02-09 02:31:42</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>34</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P5</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120838</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-26 06:11:14</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Little JavaScript in "find returns" when lookup fields are hidden</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 06:11:14</issue_when> + <thetext>Little JavaScript in "find returns" when lookup fields are hidden + +Patch for findReturns.ftl is attached.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 06:11:49</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=8) +Patch for findReturn.ftl in UOF +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-01 11:18:49</issue_when> + <thetext>Your changes are in CVS. Thanks for sending that over.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>8</attachid> + <date>2004-02-26 06:11:49</date> + <desc>Patch for findReturn.ftl in UOF</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>findReturn.ftl.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/8/findReturn.ftl.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-02-26 06:11:49</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=8) +Patch for findReturn.ftl in UOF +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 11:18:49</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 11:18:49</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:08:38</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>35</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P1</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040308103928</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>E-Commerce</subcomponent> + <reporter>razorb</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-26 06:18:48</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc>http://localhost:8080/ecommerce/control/product/~category_id=100/~product_id=GZ-1006</issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Single variant combo doesn't select properly</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>razorb</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 06:18:48</issue_when> + <thetext>Using the drop down menu to select a variantion i.e. LGPL does not set the +selection on the menu. Using the swatch/images does correctly set the menu +selection and allows adding to the basket. + +I suspect a little JS error somewhere for single variant items.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 06:52:49</issue_when> + <thetext> +I just reproduced this against the latest code base, appears to still be an issue with single feature type +virtual products.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 09:54:51</issue_when> + <thetext>Updated since this is a CVS bug and updated status</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 10:39:28</issue_when> + <thetext>fixed JS bugs in productdetail</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-26 06:52:48</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-26 06:52:48</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P1</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 09:54:51</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>STARTED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 09:54:51</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 10:39:28</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>STARTED</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 10:39:28</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>36</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120846</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-26 23:17:51</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Facility Manager: in 'inventory receive' the type of order is not checked and it's possible to receive a sales order if you enter its id in the 'purchase order id' field</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-26 23:17:51</issue_when> + <thetext>Facility Manager: in 'inventory receive' the type of order is not checked and +it's possible to receive a sales order if you enter its id in the 'purchase +order id' field. + +This is the patch in UOF for the receiveInventory.bsh file (pay attention that +some days ago I've submitted a patch for the same file against the same CVS +release): + +Index: ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh +=================================================================== +RCS file: /cvs/ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh,v +retrieving revision 1.4 +diff -u -r1.4 receiveInventory.bsh +--- ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh 25 Aug 2003 15:28:00 -0000 + 1.4 ++++ ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh 27 Feb 2004 07:17:08 -0000 +@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ + purchaseOrder = null; + if (purchaseOrderId != null && purchaseOrderId.length() > 0) { + purchaseOrder = delegator.findByPrimaryKey("OrderHeader", UtilMisc.toMap +("orderId", purchaseOrderId)); ++ if (purchaseOrder != null && !"PURCHASE_ORDER".equals +(purchaseOrder.getString("orderTypeId"))) { ++ purchaseOrder = null; ++ } + } + + product = null;</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-28 11:58:13</issue_when> + <thetext>The patch is in CVS.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-28 11:58:13</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-02-28 11:58:13</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:08:46</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>37</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120856</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-27 02:05:25</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Facility Manager: error message when trying to confirm stock moves needed.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-27 02:05:25</issue_when> + <thetext>In the Facility Manager, int the PickList -> Stock Moves page, if I try to +confirm the "stock moves needed" proposed by the system I get the following +error: + +Error calling event: org.ofbiz.content.webapp.event.EventHandlerException: No +rows to process + +And the movements are not performed.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-01 17:22:23</issue_when> + <thetext>This is caused by some code that was added to display warning messages that wiped out the rowCount +variable. The warning message loop now uses a variable names messageCount.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 17:22:23</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 17:22:23</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:08:56</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>38</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120905</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-27 02:23:36</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Facility Manager: in Edit shipment -> items tab, a wrong link to EditProduct page caused a controller error.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-27 02:23:36</issue_when> + <thetext>Facility Manager: in Edit shipment -> items tab, a wrong link to EditProduct +page caused a controller error. + +Patch for EditShipmentItems.ftl file is attached.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-27 02:24:16</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=9) +Patch for EditShipmentItems.ftl in UOF +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-01 07:38:50</issue_when> + <thetext>Your changes are in CVS. Thanks for the patch Jacopo.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>9</attachid> + <date>2004-02-27 02:24:16</date> + <desc>Patch for EditShipmentItems.ftl in UOF</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>EditShipmentItems.ftl.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/9/EditShipmentItems.ftl.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-02-27 02:24:16</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=9) +Patch for EditShipmentItems.ftl in UOF +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 07:38:50</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 07:38:50</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:09:05</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>39</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120141</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-27 04:05:34</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>SapDB problem when displaying order task list assigned to user role</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-27 04:05:34</issue_when> + <thetext>SapDB problem when displaying order task list assigned to user role: +if more than one order is assigned to user role, in "Order List" page the +orders are shown 5 times! +If only one order is assigned to the user role, the order is shown well (1 +time). + +See picture attached.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-27 04:07:00</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=10) +Bug example showing two orders waiting approval duplicated 5 times. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>image/gif</mimetype> + <attachid>10</attachid> + <date>2004-02-27 04:07:00</date> + <desc>Bug example showing two orders waiting approval duplicated 5 times.</desc> + <ispatch></ispatch> + <filename>order_list_bug.GIF</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/10/order_list_bug.GIF</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-02-27 04:07:00</when> + <field_name>attachments.thedata</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment Data</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=10) +Bug example showing two orders waiting approval duplicated 5 times. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:01:41</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>40</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20050209023003</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>WorkEffort</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-27 07:27:15</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Party lookup with empty fields returns only one person repeated many times (= number of persons).</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-27 07:27:15</issue_when> + <thetext>If, in Party lookup, you perform a lookup with empty fields (all records), +returns only one person repeated many times (= number of persons). +I suspect that the problem is in the "lookupParty" simple method in common +component.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2005-02-09 02:30:03</issue_when> + <thetext>Fixed changing the way the lookup is implemented (see Jira issue OFBIZ-114).</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:01:50</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2005-02-09 02:30:03</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2005-02-09 02:30:03</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>41</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120912</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-27 08:53:04</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Facility Manager: in Edit shipment -> items tab, a wrong link to EditProduct caused a controller error (same as issue #38)</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-27 08:53:04</issue_when> + <thetext>Facility Manager: in View shipment tab, a wrong link to EditProduct +page caused a controller error (same as issue #38). + +Patch for ViewShipmentItemInfo.ftl file is attached.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-27 08:53:50</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=11) +Patch for file ViewShipmentItemInfo.ftl in UOF +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-01 07:41:15</issue_when> + <thetext>Your changes are now in CVS. Thanks for sending those over Jacopo.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>11</attachid> + <date>2004-02-27 08:53:50</date> + <desc>Patch for file ViewShipmentItemInfo.ftl in UOF</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>ViewShipmentItemInfo.ftl.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/11/ViewShipmentItemInfo.ftl.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-02-27 08:53:50</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=11) +Patch for file ViewShipmentItemInfo.ftl in UOF +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 07:41:15</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 07:41:15</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:09:12</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>42</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040630193328</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-28 22:34:42</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>In shipment, the following error message appears: "Applet Package Weight Reader notinited"</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-28 22:34:42</issue_when> + <thetext>In shipment, the following error message appears: "Applet Package Weight Reader +notinited". +I think the problem is caused by the fact that the class ShipmentScaleApplet is +not built in the ant task. +Was this done intentionally? (I think this applet tries to connect to a scale +device connected to a serial port and so probably this could cause some +problems...).</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 17:39:52</issue_when> + <thetext>reassigned; I will comment out the applet code until this is finished</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-30 19:33:28</issue_when> + <thetext>The applet is going to be replaced with a think client shipment station UI</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 17:39:52</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:01:59</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:33:28</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:33:28</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>WONTFIX</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>43</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120921</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>E-Commerce</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-28 22:46:49</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>In "Create Return", select-all checkbox doesn't work due to wrong form name.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-28 22:46:49</issue_when> + <thetext>In "Create Return", select-all checkbox doesn't work due to wrong form name. + +Patch attached for requestreturn.ftl in Unified Output Format.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-28 22:47:40</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=12) +Patch attached for requestreturn.ftl in UOF. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-01 07:48:30</issue_when> + <thetext>Your changes are in CVS. Thanks for fixing that.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>12</attachid> + <date>2004-02-28 22:47:39</date> + <desc>Patch attached for requestreturn.ftl in UOF.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>requestreturn.ftl.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/12/requestreturn.ftl.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-02-28 22:47:40</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=12) +Patch attached for requestreturn.ftl in UOF. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 07:48:30</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 07:48:30</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:09:21</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>44</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040229030013</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-29 03:00:13</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Packages: ShipmentPackage's weight automatically updated when ShipmentPackageContent entries are added/deleted (weight taken from the Product entity).</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-29 03:00:13</issue_when> + <thetext>Packages: ShipmentPackage's weight automatically updated when +ShipmentPackageContent entries are added/deleted (weight taken from the Product +entity).</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>45</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P1</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040301155709</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-02-29 06:17:33</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>In orderview page, if you select the "QuickShip order link" you get a controller error.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-02-29 06:17:33</issue_when> + <thetext>In orderview page (/ordermgr/control/orderview), if you select the "QuickShip +order link" you get a controller error: + +org.ofbiz.content.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request +[quickShipOrderMultiFacility]; this request does not exist or cannot be called +directly.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-01 12:11:07</issue_when> + <thetext>I'll get on this...</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-01 15:57:09</issue_when> + <thetext>Changed the default behavior for this; also added request-map and service defs for the quick ship from +multi facilites.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 12:11:07</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>STARTED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 15:57:09</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>STARTED</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-01 15:57:09</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>46</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040806152631</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-02 05:13:01</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Patch for multiple inventory facility reservation</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-02 05:13:01</issue_when> + <thetext>Patch for multiple inventory facility reservation: +the intent of this is to perform reservation only if all items are available in +one facility: that, I think, is the declared behaviour, and what is checked +with the isInventoryAvailable method.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-02 05:13:49</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=13) +Patch for ProductStoreWorker.java in UOF +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-06 15:26:31</issue_when> + <thetext>Thanks Jacopo, your patch is now in CVS.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>13</attachid> + <date>2004-03-02 05:13:49</date> + <desc>Patch for ProductStoreWorker.java in UOF</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>ProductStoreWorker.java.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/13/ProductStoreWorker.java.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-03-02 05:13:49</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=13) +Patch for ProductStoreWorker.java in UOF +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:02:10</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-08-06 15:26:31</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-08-06 15:26:31</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>47</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040323221326</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-02 06:06:51</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Facility -> Shipment: patch for JavaScript error introduced during i18n process.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-02 06:06:51</issue_when> + <thetext>Facility -> Shipment: patch for JavaScript error introduced during i18n process.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-02 06:07:51</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=14) +Patch for AddItemsFromOrder.ftl file in UOF +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 17:42:45</issue_when> + <thetext>reassigned</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-23 22:13:26</issue_when> + <thetext>This bug has been fixed by the code for the new feature regarding shipment +plans.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>14</attachid> + <date>2004-03-02 06:07:51</date> + <desc>Patch for AddItemsFromOrder.ftl file in UOF</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>AddItemsFromOrder.ftl.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/14/AddItemsFromOrder.ftl.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-03-02 06:07:51</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=14) +Patch for AddItemsFromOrder.ftl file in UOF +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 17:42:45</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:02:18</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-03-23 22:13:26</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-03-23 22:13:26</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>48</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120228</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-02 06:28:37</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Facility -> Shipment -> Items: delete shipment item link returns a constraint violation error.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-02 06:28:37</issue_when> + <thetext>Facility -> Shipment -> Items: delete shipment item link returns a constraint +violation error: + +The following errors occurred: +ERROR: Could not complete the Delete ShipmentItem process [problem removing the +lookedUpValue value: Exception while deleting the following entity: +[GenericEntity:ShipmentItem][shipmentId,10010(java.lang.String)] +[shipmentItemSeqId,00001(java.lang.String)] (SQL Exception while executing the +following:DELETE FROM SHIPMENT_ITEM WHERE SHIPMENT_ID=? AND +SHIPMENT_ITEM_SEQ_ID=? (Integrity constraint violation ITEM_ISS_SHITM table: +ITEM_ISSUANCE in statement [DELETE FROM SHIPMENT_ITEM WHERE SHIPMENT_ID=? AND +SHIPMENT_ITEM_SEQ_ID=?]))] + +In my opinion, the delete shipment item link should perform something like this +(instead of barely trying to remove the ShipmentItem entry): it should remove +the item issuances, recreate the reservations and then remove the shipment item.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:02:28</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>49</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040528001027</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-03 03:11:18</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Facility -> Receive PO: at now it's possible to receive multiple times the same shipment items. This is a partial patch for this problem.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-03 03:11:18</issue_when> + <thetext>Facility -> Receive PO: at now it's possible to receive multiple times the same +shipment items. This is a partial patch for this problem. With the attached +patch the shipment already delivered (or cancelled) are not shown (and so the +user cannot receive them again). +In order to completely fix this issue the best solution is, in my opinion, to +automatically update the shipment status to "delivered" when the user receives +an item: this could be done modifying the service +group "receiveInventoryProduct" by adding to it the "updateShipment" service +(to update the shipment status). However I'm going to add this comments to a +new "DEFECT" issue.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-03 03:12:11</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=15) +Patch for file receiveInventory.bsh in UOF. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-28 00:10:27</issue_when> + <thetext>This is now in CVS, thanks for sending it over Jacopo.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>15</attachid> + <date>2004-03-03 03:12:11</date> + <desc>Patch for file receiveInventory.bsh in UOF.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>receiveInventory.bsh.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/15/receiveInventory.bsh.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-03-03 03:12:11</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=15) +Patch for file receiveInventory.bsh in UOF. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:02:37</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-28 00:10:27</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-28 00:10:27</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>50</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040528000924</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-03 03:15:23</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Facility -> Receive PO: at now it's possible to receive multiple times the same shipment items.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-03 03:15:24</issue_when> + <thetext>Facility -> Receive PO: at now it's possible to receive multiple times the same +shipment items. +This problem was partially fixed by the patch attached to issue #49. +With that patch the shipment already delivered (or cancelled) are not shown +(and so the user cannot receive them again). +In order to completely fix this issue the best solution is, in my opinion, to +automatically update the shipment status to "delivered" when the user receives +an item: this could be done modifying the service +group "receiveInventoryProduct" by adding to it the "updateShipment" service +(to update the shipment status). However I'm going to add this comments to a +new "DEFECT" issue.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-28 00:09:24</issue_when> + <thetext>The patch is in, now just need to update the shipment status as mentioned in the description.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:02:49</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>51</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>REMIND</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040811004716</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Startup</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-03 06:37:30</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Several SapDB error messages are generated at startup when entities are created.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-03 06:37:30</issue_when> + <thetext>Several SapDB error messages are generated at startup when entities are created. +The messages appear during the indices' generation phase, not for all entities +(maybe 5-10%); here is an example: + +147042[ DatabaseUtil.java:319:ERROR] Could not create foreign key indices +for entity "EftAccount": SQL Exception while executing the following: +CREATE INDEX EFTACCT_PMETH ON EFT_ACCOUNT (PAYMENT_METHOD_ID) +Error was: com.sap.dbtech.jdbc.exceptions.DatabaseException: [-7055] (at 44): +Column(s) already indexed:EFTACCT_PMETH +SQL Exception while executing the following: +CREATE INDEX EFTACCT_PADDR ON EFT_ACCOUNT (CONTACT_MECH_ID) +Error was: com.sap.dbtech.jdbc.exceptions.DatabaseException: [-7055] (at 44): +Column(s) already indexed:EFTACCT_PADDR</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-11 00:47:16</issue_when> + <thetext>I've created a new issue (OFBIZ-1) for this in Jira; in it you will find a lot +of details. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:03:00</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-08-11 00:47:16</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-08-11 00:47:16</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>REMIND</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>52</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040308121509</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-04 03:14:08</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Billing accounts selectable by users during order entry are not correctly filtered out.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-04 03:14:08</issue_when> + <thetext>Billing accounts selectable by users as payment methods during order entry are +not correctly filtered out: removed billing accounts are also shown (i.e. +billing accounts with thru date < now).</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 12:15:09</issue_when> + <thetext>Billing accounts are now filtered by date so expired accounts no longer show on order manager order +entry and the ecommerce checkout pages</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 12:15:09</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 12:15:09</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 12:15:09</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>53</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040528010450</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-05 06:01:05</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>In Shipment: it's possible to issue 0 quantities from AddItemsFormOrder page.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-05 06:01:05</issue_when> + <thetext>In Shipment: it's possible to issue 0 quantities from AddItemsFormOrder page +(an ItemIssuance record is created with 0 quantity). +I think this should be avoided by submitting only quantities > 0.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-28 01:04:50</issue_when> + <thetext>Now checks to see if quantity is empty or 0 when issuing OIIRs to the shipment.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:03:13</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-28 01:04:50</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-28 01:04:50</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>54</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P1</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040630124239</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-05 06:20:02</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>In Shipment: if you enter a non numeric value (such as null quantity) in the issue field the program returns a bad error.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-05 06:20:02</issue_when> + <thetext>In Shipment: if you enter a non numeric value (such as null quantity) in the +issue field the program returns a bad error. +See also issue#53. +I'm running SapDB and after this error I need to restart OFBiz because in every +page I receive SQL errors like the following: + +Target exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDataSourceException: SQL Exception +occurred on commit (Cannot commit a transactional connection: See JDBC 2.0 +Optional Package Specification section 7.1 (p25)) +BSF info: ..\ofbiz\components\content\webapp\content\WEB- +INF\actions\includes\envsetup.bsh at line: 0 column: 0)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-30 12:42:39</issue_when> + <thetext>Applied patch which fixes a bug in the service multi event handler</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:03:23</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 12:42:39</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 12:42:39</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>55</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040323221851</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-05 06:25:34</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>In shipment, it's possible to issue to shipment items with negative reservations (atp < 0); as a consequence of this, also the inventory items' quantity on hand can be negative.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-05 06:25:34</issue_when> + <thetext>I've noticed that, in shipment, it's possible to issue to shipment items with +negative reservations (atp < 0); as a consequence of this, also the inventory +items' quantity on hand can be negative. +In my opinion, in this situation at least a warning message should be +provided.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-23 22:18:51</issue_when> + <thetext>In "Order Items" page a new column has been added that tells users if they are +issuing negative reservations and the default issuance value is also +decremented by this quantity. +However is still possible to override this value and force an issuance for a +negative reservation. + +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:03:32</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-03-23 22:18:51</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-03-23 22:18:51</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>56</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040308173638</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Party</subcomponent> + <reporter>vivalinux</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-08 14:07:32</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc>http://<ofbiz_root_url>/partymgr/control/findparty</issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Selecting "Show All Records" displays all names as "(Not selected)"</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>vivalinux</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 14:07:32</issue_when> + <thetext>The findparty.bsh constructs a dynamic view tailored to the search fields +submited by the lookupparty form. Since selecting all does not give a hint about +which fields the client is interested in, the findparty.bsh fails to include any +of the name (firstName, lastName, groupName) fields. + +The can be corrected with the patch that follows or handling the select all +records as yet another case. I think, I'll side with simplicity, and sacrify +efficiency .... + +Hope this helps. + + +Index: components/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/party/findparty.bsh +=================================================================== +RCS file: +/cvs/ofbiz/components/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/party/findparty.bsh,v +retrieving revision 1.13 +diff -u -r1.13 findparty.bsh +--- components/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/party/findparty.bsh 27 Jan +2004 19:44:36 -0000 1.13 ++++ components/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/party/findparty.bsh 8 Mar +2004 22:06:24 -0000 +@@ -100,8 +100,15 @@ + + // default view settings + dynamicView.addMemberEntity("PT", "Party"); ++ dynamicView.addMemberEntity("PG", "PartyGroup"); ++ dynamicView.addMemberEntity("PP", "Person"); + dynamicView.addAlias("PT", "partyId"); + dynamicView.addAlias("PT", "partyTypeId"); ++ dynamicView.addAlias("PG", "groupName"); ++ dynamicView.addAlias("PP", "firstName"); ++ dynamicView.addAlias("PP", "lastName"); ++ dynamicView.addViewLink("PT","PG",true,UtilMisc.toList(new +ModelKeyMap("partyId", "partyId"))); ++ dynamicView.addViewLink("PT","PP",true,UtilMisc.toList(new +ModelKeyMap("partyId", "partyId"))); + dynamicView.addRelation("one-nofk", "", "PartyType", +ModelKeyMap.makeKeyMapList("partyTypeId")); + dynamicView.addRelation("many", "", "UserLogin", +ModelKeyMap.makeKeyMapList("partyId")); + +@@ -143,11 +150,6 @@ + if (groupName != null && groupName.length() > 0) { + paramList = paramList + "&groupName=" + groupName; + +- // modify the dynamic view +- dynamicView.addMemberEntity("PG", "PartyGroup"); +- dynamicView.addAlias("PG", "groupName"); +- dynamicView.addViewLink("PT", "PG", Boolean.FALSE, +ModelKeyMap.makeKeyMapList("partyId")); +- + // add the expr + andExprs.add(new EntityExpr("groupName", true, EntityOperator.LIKE, +"%"+groupName+"%", true)); + } +@@ -160,14 +162,6 @@ + firstName = request.getParameter("firstName"); + lastName = request.getParameter("lastName"); + +- // modify the dynamic view +- if ((firstName != null && firstName.length() > 0) || (lastName != null && +lastName.length() > 0)) { +- dynamicView.addMemberEntity("PE", "Person"); +- dynamicView.addAlias("PE", "firstName"); +- dynamicView.addAlias("PE", "lastName"); +- dynamicView.addViewLink("PT", "PE", Boolean.FALSE, +ModelKeyMap.makeKeyMapList("partyId")); +- } +- + // filter on firstName + if (firstName != null && firstName.length() > 0) { + paramList = paramList + "&firstName=" + firstName; +@@ -319,6 +313,12 @@ + List orderBy = new ArrayList(); + fieldsToSelect.add("partyId"); + fieldsToSelect.add("partyTypeId"); ++ fieldsToSelect.add("firstName"); ++ fieldsToSelect.add("lastName"); ++ fieldsToSelect.add("groupName"); ++ orderBy.add("-partyTypeId"); ++ orderBy.add("lastName"); ++ orderBy.add("groupName"); + + // UserLogin + if (userLoginId != null && userLoginId.length() > 0) { +@@ -327,14 +327,11 @@ + + // Person + if ((firstName != null && firstName.length() > 0) || (lastName != null +&& lastName.length() > 0)) { +- fieldsToSelect.add("firstName"); +- fieldsToSelect.add("lastName"); + orderBy.add("lastName"); + orderBy.add("firstName"); + } + // PartyGroup + if (groupName != null && groupName.length() > 0) { +- fieldsToSelect.add("groupName"); + orderBy.add("groupName"); + } + // RoleType +Index: components/party/webapp/partymgr/party/findparty.ftl +=================================================================== +RCS file: /cvs/ofbiz/components/party/webapp/partymgr/party/findparty.ftl,v +retrieving revision 1.10 +diff -u -r1.10 findparty.ftl +--- components/party/webapp/partymgr/party/findparty.ftl 1 Mar 2004 14:43:27 +-0000 1.10 ++++ components/party/webapp/partymgr/party/findparty.ftl 8 Mar 2004 22:06:24 -0000 +@@ -212,13 +212,12 @@ + </table> + <input type="image" src="/images/spacer.gif" +onClick="javascript:document.lookupparty.submit();"> + </form> +-<#if requestParameters.hideFields?default("N") != "Y"> + <script language="JavaScript"> + <!--// + document.lookupparty.partyId.focus(); + //--> + </script> +-</#if> ++ + <#if partyList?exists> + <br> + <table border=0 width='100%' cellspacing='0' cellpadding='0' +class='boxoutside'> +@@ -292,21 +291,13 @@ + </td> + <td> + <div class="tabletext"> +- <#if partyRow.containsKey("lastName")> + <#if partyRow.lastName?has_content> + ${partyRow.lastName}<#if +partyRow.firstName?has_content>, ${partyRow.firstName}</#if> +- <#else> +- (No Name Found) +- </#if> +- <#elseif partyRow.containsKey("groupName")> +- <#if partyRow.groupName?has_content> ++ <#elseif partyRow.groupName?has_content> + ${partyRow.groupName} + <#else> +- (No Name Found) ++ (Not Selected) + </#if> +- <#else> +- (Not Selected) +- </#if> + </td> + <#if extInfo?default("") == "P"> + <td><div +class="tabletext">${partyRow.postalCode?if_exists}</div></td></thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 17:36:38</issue_when> + <thetext>This page has been changed from using the left joins in the dynamic view. Using left joins performs too +poorly for actual use. This patch has been rejected; a new task will be opened for fixing the problem of +the name not being displayed.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 17:36:38</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 17:36:38</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>WONTFIX</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>57</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040308174641</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Party</subcomponent> + <reporter>ajzeneski</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-08 17:36:18</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Find Party - Show all does not show name</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 17:36:18</issue_when> + <thetext>The name is not displayed when selecting show all in the party manager.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 17:46:41</issue_when> + <thetext>reassigned</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-08 17:46:41</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>58</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040308185722</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Content</subcomponent> + <reporter>vivalinux</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-08 18:57:22</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Inherited hidden fields overide child fields when they have use-when</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>vivalinux</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-08 18:57:22</issue_when> + <thetext>In working with inherited forms I noticed that hidden fields are hard +to override if the overriding field has a use-when attribute: + + Since the HtmlFormRenderer gives precedence to hidden fields, and new +fields with "use-when" are only placed in front of existing fields +but not merged with, the resulting behavior is that hidden fields of +parent forms always get rendered even when the use-when condition is +true. This causes the hidden field to take precedence over the user +input when the form is submitted. + + Here is a posible solution: + +Index: components/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/widget/form/ModelForm.java +=================================================================== +RCS file: +/usr/local/cvsrepos/newriverbiz/components/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/widget/form/ModelForm.java,v +retrieving revision 1.1.1.4 +diff -u -r1.1.1.4 ModelForm.java +--- components/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/widget/form/ModelForm.java +2004/01/08 14:19:55 1.1.1.4 ++++ components/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/widget/form/ModelForm.java +2004/01/29 20:23:20 +@@ -277,15 +277,25 @@ + public ModelFormField addUpdateField(ModelFormField modelFormField) { + if (!modelFormField.isUseWhenEmpty()) { + // is a conditional field, add to the List but don't worry about +the Map +- //for adding to list, see if there is another field with that name +in the list and if so, put it before that one ++ //for adding to list, see if there is another field with that name ++ //in the list and if so, put it before that one + boolean inserted = false; + for (int i = 0; i < this.fieldList.size(); i++) { + ModelFormField curField = (ModelFormField) this.fieldList.get(i); ++ // BUG FIX: parent hidden fields are left and rendered even when they ++ // are overriden with fields that have a use-when + if (curField.getName() != null && +curField.getName().equals(modelFormField.getName())) { +- this.fieldList.add(i, modelFormField); +- inserted = true; +- break; ++ if ((curField.getFieldInfo().getFieldType() != +ModelFormField.FieldInfo.HIDDEN) && ++ (curField.getFieldInfo().getFieldType() != ModelFormField.FieldInfo.IGNORED)) { ++ this.fieldList.add(i, modelFormField); ++ inserted = true; ++ break; ++ } else { ++ curField.mergeOverrideModelFormField(modelFormField); ++ break; ++ } + } ++ //End of BUG fix + } + if (!inserted) { + this.fieldList.add(modelFormField);</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>59</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P1</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040318120354</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Workflow</subcomponent> + <reporter>mbennani</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 06:47:17</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Serious Problem in Sub-flow Implementation: in-Memory Requester Used!!</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>mbennani</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 06:47:17</issue_when> + <thetext>I am running ofbiz almost v.3 :-) (image from late 2003 from cvs). +(subflow implementation did not change since 1.2 anyways, I believe) + +Quick Description: +------------------ +Subflows are using the in-memory requester object which +does not persist over server re-starts. This is serious one guys. + +More Description (Scenario): +--------------------------- +I have a main process with 3 steps(step1,step2-subflow,step3). A subflow +process being the second step. This second step calls another process that I +call sub. sub has 2 simple steps (substep1,substep2). + +Now, in normal time (i.e no server restart), it all works fine and my main +process runs fine, calls the subflow, subflow runs, the call returns and my +step3 of the main process runs successfully and main completes fine. + +The problem arises when say I run step 1 of main process, subflow gets +initiated, substep1 is executed, and before substep2 is executed, I stop the +server (faking a server problem..., connection lost...whatever). +When I restart the server, the subflow resumes at substep2 which executes fine, +and eventually completes the subflow process. But, step-subflow activity in the +workeffort table still shows WF_RUNNING. Therefore, my main process is hanging +there and will never move along. The waitForResult() is not executed anymore +after server restart. +This is happening in WfActivitySubFlowImplementation on runService. + +Even More Details, code wise, if you want to look at it: +------------------------------------------------------- +In a normal scenario (no server stopped), the runService of +WfActivitySubFlowImplementation eventually calls the runSync in WorkflowEngine +and then waitForResult. I put a system out message in the waiter class and I +can see my message being displayed in the console forever ("waiting..."), until +the subflow process finishes. And that's ok, that's what we want. When the +subflow process finishes, the call is returned back to the runService in +WfActivitySubFlowImplementation() and the setComplete is called, which changes +the status of my step2-subflow activity in the main process to WF_COMPLETED to +advance the main process. It also calls setResults() to propagate the results +from the subflow up to the main process. + +BUT, now if I stop my server during that wait, and restart it the call never +reachs the setComplete nor the setResults, making therefore my main process +unusable anymore.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:03:54</when> + <field_name>op_sys</field_name> + <field_desc>OS/Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Windows 2000</oldvalue> + <newvalue>All</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:03:54</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>60</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040707152609</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 07:09:04</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Replace simplistic caching with complex reverse dependency resolver</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:09:04</issue_when> + <thetext>This patch removes all simple caching from GenericDelegator, and replaces +it with a stand-alone class, that handles all entity cache management. It +uses new features in the entity model, that keeps track of view entities +that are referenced by regular entities. As entities are updated, all +cached lists of views or condition caches are cleared. + +With this patch applied, view entities can be cached, without worry that +they will become stale. Which then allows very complex views to be +created, that emulate complex code patterns, while still allowing for +caching. This can speed up code tremendously. + +Additionally, since cache clearing now works, it almost always makes more +sense to use the cache variation of the methods.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:14:24</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=16) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 15:44:46</issue_when> + <thetext>This patch is on hold, until some other patches are committed. Some of them +need to have bugs filed, which I am working on. Plus, this patch needs to be +updated to the latest code base(not a big task, done locally).</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-07 15:26:09</issue_when> + <thetext>This is now in cvs.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>16</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 07:14:24</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>EntityCache.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/16/EntityCache.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 07:14:24</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=16) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 15:44:46</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>STARTED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:16:01</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>FEATURE</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-07-07 15:26:09</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>STARTED</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-07-07 15:26:09</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>61</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040422222023</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 07:18:26</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Allow for easier extension of this class.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:18:26</issue_when> + <thetext>This patch makes a protected writeValues() method, which allows sub-classes +to redirect the output to other places, as needed.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:18:49</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=17) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-22 22:20:23</issue_when> + <thetext>Applied the patch.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>17</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 07:18:49</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>EntitySaxReader-extension.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/17/EntitySaxReader-extension.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 07:18:49</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=17) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:20:23</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:20:23</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>62</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040422223418</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 07:34:07</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Allow for UPPER() and LOWER() sorting</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:34:07</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:34:26</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=18) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-22 22:34:18</issue_when> + <thetext>Applied patch.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>18</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 07:34:26</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>EntityUtil-UPPER_LOWER.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/18/EntityUtil-UPPER_LOWER.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 07:34:26</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=18) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:34:18</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:34:18</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>63</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040429160209</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 07:36:19</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Add support for turning off schemas completely</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:36:19</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:36:42</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=19) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:02:09</issue_when> + <thetext>Applied this patch.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>19</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 07:36:42</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>use-schemas.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/19/use-schemas.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 07:36:42</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=19) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:02:09</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:02:09</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>64</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040422222810</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 07:43:55</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Make the code look like the rest of the file.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:43:55</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:44:21</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=20) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-22 22:28:10</issue_when> + <thetext>Applied patch.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>20</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 07:44:21</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>SqlJdbcUtil-Cast.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/20/SqlJdbcUtil-Cast.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 07:44:21</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=20) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:28:10</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:28:10</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>65</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040429163146</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 07:46:14</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Add java.util.Date support.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:46:14</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:46:39</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=21) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:31:46</issue_when> + <thetext>Applied the patch.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>21</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 07:46:39</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>SqlJdbcUtil-Java_Util_Date.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/21/SqlJdbcUtil-Java_Util_Date.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 07:46:39</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=21) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:16:03</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>FEATURE</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:31:45</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:31:45</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>66</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040422221943</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 07:47:46</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Use UtilValidate.isNotEmpty.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:47:46</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:48:06</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=22) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-22 22:19:43</issue_when> + <thetext>Applied patch, which uses UtilValidate.isNotEmpty in SqlJdbcUtil.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>22</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 07:48:06</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>SqlJdbcUtil-UtilValidate.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/22/SqlJdbcUtil-UtilValidate.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 07:48:06</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=22) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:19:43</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:19:43</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>67</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040429161604</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 07:49:20</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Add support for <constraint> on relations and views.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:49:20</issue_when> + <thetext>When defining a view or relation, you can now constrain the returned +values to those that match an EntityCondition. This is really helpful +for complex views.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:49:42</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=23) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>23</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 07:49:42</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>model-constraint.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/23/model-constraint.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 07:49:42</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=23) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:16:04</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>FEATURE</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>68</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040423074926</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 07:51:20</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Use a NumberFormat for casting number objects to strings.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:51:20</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:51:40</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=24) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-23 07:49:26</issue_when> + <thetext>Applied patch.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>24</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 07:51:40</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>GenericEntity-NumberFormat.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/24/GenericEntity-NumberFormat.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 07:51:40</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=24) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-23 07:49:26</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-23 07:49:26</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>69</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040423075223</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 07:52:20</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Add addToXmlElement method</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:52:20</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:52:42</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=25) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-23 07:52:23</issue_when> + <thetext>Applied patch.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>25</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 07:52:42</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>GenericEntity-addToXmlElement.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/25/GenericEntity-addToXmlElement.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 07:52:42</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=25) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-23 07:52:23</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-23 07:52:23</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>70</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040422221512</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 07:54:40</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Fix modelEntity dereferencing</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:54:40</issue_when> + <thetext>When GenericEntities have been deserialized, modelEntity will be null. +getModelEntity() should be called, to repopulate it.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:54:57</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=26) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-22 22:15:12</issue_when> + <thetext>Applied patch, plus fixed it in a few other areas.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>26</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 07:54:57</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>GenericEntity-getModelEntity.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/26/GenericEntity-getModelEntity.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 07:54:57</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=26) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:15:12</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:15:12</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>71</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040501214447</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Content</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 07:56:46</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Factor out the code</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:56:46</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 07:57:40</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=27) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:51</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-01 06:06:43</issue_when> + <thetext>Not adding this patch, breaks the Server Stats Since Start page in WebTools, and not totally sure the +cleanup is worth it yet.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-01 21:44:47</issue_when> + <thetext>I'll fix that page then, and submit a revised patch.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>27</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 07:57:40</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>ServerHitBin-factor.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/27/ServerHitBin-factor.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 07:57:40</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=27) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:16:02</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>FEATURE</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:51</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 06:07:05</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P2</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P4</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>72</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040422223139</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 08:04:05</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Add a matches(condition) helper method.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:04:05</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:04:31</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=28) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-22 22:31:39</issue_when> + <thetext>Applied patch.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>28</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 08:04:31</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>GenericEntity-matches-condition.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/28/GenericEntity-matches-condition.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 08:04:31</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=28) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:31:39</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:31:39</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>73</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040422221835</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 08:05:30</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Fix deserializing of these objects.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:05:30</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:05:51</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=29) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-22 22:18:35</issue_when> + <thetext>Applied patch, which set delegatorName to "default" when it is null.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>29</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 08:05:50</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>GenericDelegator-fix-serialization.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/29/GenericDelegator-fix-serialization.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 08:05:51</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=29) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:18:35</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:18:35</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>74</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040429200642</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 08:08:00</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Fix all fetchers of shopping cart to use a static method</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:08:00</issue_when> + <thetext>This patch fixes all code that fetches the ShoppingCart from the session, +to use a static method instead. It also adds the beginning of named +ShoppingCart support.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:08:22</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=30) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:51</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 20:05:04</issue_when> + <thetext>This patch depends on EntityCache, which isn't ready for inclussion yet, +reducing priority.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 20:06:42</issue_when> + <thetext>Oops, modified wrong issue.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>30</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 08:08:22</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>ShoppingCart-getShoppingCart.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/30/ShoppingCart-getShoppingCart.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 08:08:22</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=30) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:16:03</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>FEATURE</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:51</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 20:05:04</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P2</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P3</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 20:06:41</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>75</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040429171641</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 08:09:21</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Allow code to detect whether a cacheline has expired.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:09:21</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:09:41</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=31) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:57:47</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority to P2, as I need these applied before I can commit my entity +cache work.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 17:16:41</issue_when> + <thetext>Now in CVS, thanks Adam.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>31</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 08:09:41</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilCache-hasExpired.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/31/UtilCache-hasExpired.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 08:09:41</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=31) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:16:04</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>FEATURE</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:57:47</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-29 17:16:41</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-29 17:16:41</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>76</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040429171643</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 08:10:31</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Allow code to get the values stored in the cache.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:10:31</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:10:58</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=32) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:57:47</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority to P2, as I need these applied before I can commit my entity +cache work.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 17:16:43</issue_when> + <thetext>Now in CVS, thanks Adam.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>32</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 08:10:58</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilCache-getCacheLineValues.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/32/UtilCache-getCacheLineValues.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 08:10:58</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=32) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:16:05</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>FEATURE</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:57:47</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-29 17:16:43</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-29 17:16:43</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>77</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040429171648</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 08:11:52</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Allow registering of listeners for the various events on caches.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:11:52</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:12:13</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=33) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:57:48</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority to P2, as I need these applied before I can commit my entity +cache work.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 17:16:48</issue_when> + <thetext>Now in CVS, thanks Adam.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>33</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 08:12:12</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilCache-listeners.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/33/UtilCache-listeners.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 08:12:13</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=33) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:16:05</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>FEATURE</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:57:48</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-29 17:16:48</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-29 17:16:48</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>78</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040423080723</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 08:19:59</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Some additional methods to manipulate the embedded cache.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:19:59</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:20:20</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=34) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-23 08:07:23</issue_when> + <thetext>Add some more methods to GenericValue to manipulate the cache.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>34</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 08:20:20</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>GenericValue-EmbeddedCache.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/34/GenericValue-EmbeddedCache.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 08:20:20</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=34) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-23 08:07:23</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-23 08:07:23</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>79</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040429200727</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 08:21:27</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>methods to fetch the list of available catalogs.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:21:27</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:21:46</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=35) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:52</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 20:07:27</issue_when> + <thetext>This patch depends on EntityCache, which isn't ready for inclussion yet, +reducing priority.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>35</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 08:21:46</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>CatalogWorker-getCatalogsAvailable.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/35/CatalogWorker-getCatalogsAvailable.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 08:21:46</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=35) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:16:05</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>FEATURE</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:52</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 20:07:27</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P2</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P3</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>80</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040422222535</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 08:22:53</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Create a separate makeIndexName helper method.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:22:53</issue_when> + <thetext>This patch also truncates the index name, based on the clipping value.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:23:14</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=36) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-22 22:25:35</issue_when> + <thetext>Applied patch.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>36</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 08:23:14</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>DatabaseUtil-makeIndexName.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/36/DatabaseUtil-makeIndexName.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 08:23:14</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=36) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:25:35</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-22 22:25:35</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>81</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040429172408</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 08:23:52</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Add support for writing elements.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:23:52</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:24:13</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=37) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:57:47</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority to P2, as I need these applied before I can commit my entity +cache work.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 17:24:08</issue_when> + <thetext>Now in CVS, thanks Adam.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>37</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 08:24:12</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilXml-writeElement.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/37/UtilXml-writeElement.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 08:24:13</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=37) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:16:03</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>FEATURE</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:57:47</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-29 17:24:08</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-29 17:24:08</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>82</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040429195752</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Party</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 08:25:06</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Services/etc for manipulating PartyAttributes.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:25:06</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 08:25:27</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=38) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:52</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>38</attachid> + <date>2004-03-09 08:25:27</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>PartyAttributes.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/38/PartyAttributes.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-09 08:25:27</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=38) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:16:04</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>FEATURE</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:52</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>83</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P5</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040309095844</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Content</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 09:58:44</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Problems displaying the Euro symbol in order confirmation by email with MS Outlook</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 09:58:44</issue_when> + <thetext>Problems displaying the Euro symbol in order confirmation by email with MS +Outlook: instead of the beautyful Euro symbol you see a '?'. +Ok, maybe I should create an issue to the Microsoft issue tracker... however +I've reported this for two reasons: +1) other users reported this some time ago in the mailing lists +2) maybe, in general, for the currency symbols in ftl templates we should use +the html entity references (i.e. &euro; for the Euro symbol): this will solve +all the display problems with virtually any client software.</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>84</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040309101202</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-09 10:12:02</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>In shipment, it's possible to issue to shipment items with negative reservations (atp < 0); as a consequence of this, also the inventory items' quantity on hand can be negative.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-09 10:12:02</issue_when> + <thetext>In shipment, it's possible to issue to shipment items with negative +reservations (atp < 0); as a consequence of this, also the inventory items' +quantity on hand can be negative. +In fact, when the issuance is performed, the (negative) reservation is deleted +and a new issuance is created and the inventory's qoh is decremented. +In my opinion, in this situation a warning message should be provided. +Also, David Jones has suggested to create a report of all negative QOH +InventoryItems and add a link for each one to get a physical inventory variance +started.</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>85</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040730212116</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Party</subcomponent> + <reporter>jonesde</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-11 08:14:35</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>The showvisits page in the Party Manager is very slow when there are many visits</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-11 08:14:35</issue_when> + <thetext>The showvisits page is not coded to efficiently display a subset of the visits when there are many active. +When there are tens of thousands the current code doesn't work very efficiently.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-30 21:21:16</issue_when> + <thetext>The code for visit display utilized the entity list iterator and pulls a subset for each page. The query +fields are indexed (as of now) so depending on the JDBC driver being used this should be quite efficient. +If you experience further problems, send more information to the DEV list.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:04:04</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 21:21:16</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 21:21:16</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>86</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040312164734</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Content</subcomponent> + <reporter>jonesde</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-12 16:45:26</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Error Message (esp Map) Improvements from Quake Wang</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-12 16:45:26</issue_when> + <thetext>A description from an email from Quake: + +================================ +David, + The attachment is my patch. The main changes are: + +1. Now the event and the service invoke will use the same message fields in SimpleMethod. +2. Add the errorMessageMap and successMessageMap for the message handling + + I only change the envsetup.bsh and errormsg.ftl in the ecommerce component, please use the +ecommerce to review the backward compatiblity. + +Regards +Quake +=============================</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-12 16:47:34</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=39) +Error Message patch from Quake Wang +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>39</attachid> + <date>2004-03-12 16:47:34</date> + <desc>Error Message patch from Quake Wang</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>quake.errormessages.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>3</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jonesde</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/39/quake.errormessages.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-12 16:47:34</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=39) +Error Message patch from Quake Wang +</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>87</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040312165745</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-12 16:56:52</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>bsf.jar in base is old</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-12 16:56:52</issue_when> + <thetext>bsf is no longer part of IBM. Instead, it has moved to jakarta. + +Attached patch changes imports, etc. It can't change the bsf.jar in +base/lib/scripting/, however.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-12 16:57:45</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=40) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>40</attachid> + <date>2004-03-12 16:57:45</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>IBM-Jakarta-BSF.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/40/IBM-Jakarta-BSF.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-03-12 16:57:45</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=40) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>88</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040312165737</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>jonesde</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-12 16:57:37</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Promotion/other adjustments not as expected when cancelling order items</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-12 16:57:37</issue_when> + <thetext>When order items are cancelled some order level adjustments are not changed, like order level +promotion adjustments. Because of this order totals can easily become negative. The question is what +to do about it? + +Andy wrote this at one point in an email: + +============================ +I was aware of this; the only order level adjustments which are currently re-calculated are shipping and +tax, order level promotions are not done at this time so we will need to add this in. In order to do this +promotion evaluation will need to be able to be done without a shopping cart. +============================ + +I'm not sure I totally agree with this, I think short of that it would still be good to at least pro-rate these +order adjustments like we do with tax and shipping. + +Or would it be better on any order change to just cancel the order and create a new one with full re- +calculations, including promotions, tax, shipping, etc, etc? If that is done should we apply promotions, +etc as if it was the original order date, or using today's date? (could be a big difference based on +promotions that come and go over time)</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>89</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040312171315</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jonesde</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-12 17:10:18</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>In product detail show variant prices (from Brian Johnson)</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-12 17:10:18</issue_when> + <thetext>Here is a description from an email from Brian Johnson: + +=================================== +I've changed productdetail to better handle variants with different prices. When you first bring-up the +page it says "make selections", then when you select the features from the drop-downs it'll show the +price for the product with those features. +-- +Brian Johnson +===================================</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-12 17:13:15</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=41) +Show prices for variants along with drop down, patch from Brian Johnson +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>41</attachid> + <date>2004-03-12 17:13:15</date> + <desc>Show prices for variants along with drop down, patch from Brian Johnson</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>productdetail-variantprices.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>3</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jonesde</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/41/productdetail-variantprices.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-12 17:11:11</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>DEFECT</oldvalue> + <newvalue>PATCH</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-12 17:13:15</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=41) +Show prices for variants along with drop down, patch from Brian Johnson +</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>90</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040312172159</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>E-Commerce</subcomponent> + <reporter>jonesde</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-12 17:21:59</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Web/order/etc marketing reports like Core Metrics</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-12 17:21:59</issue_when> + <thetext>The feature here is to create a standard set of reports commonly used to keep tabs on a web content +and/or ecommerce site. These reports would be similar to what a company like Core Metrics offers. + +Would include reports for a given time period such as for things like hits, visits/sessions, orders, +tracking codes, percent of customers that order, orders per customer, pages/products/etc viewed, +searches done, referring sites & search strings, etc, etc, etc.</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>91</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040315011245</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-15 01:12:45</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Shipment: potential problem when issuing negative reservations (quantityNotAvailable could be lost)</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-15 01:12:45</issue_when> + <thetext>This is a potential problem when you issue negative reservation to a shipment. +Here is the scenario: + +1) inventory item 9000 for product WG-1111 with atp/qoh = 10/10 +2) two orders are received for WG-1111: the first for 8 items, the second +for 5 items +3) two reservations are made: the first for 8 items and the second for 5 +items but with quantityNotAvailable = 3 +4) the inventory item 9000 is now: atp/qoh = -3/10 +5) only the second order is issued to shipment: the reservation record is +deleted and the qoh is decremented +6) the inventory item 9000 is now: atp/qoh = -3/5 but the reservation for +the first order (for quantity = 8) has quantityNotAvailable = 0 (ERROR: it +should be 3) + +A possible patch: if we issue a negative reservation we should try to assign +the quantityNotAvailable to another reservation in the same inventory item. + +In order to do this, David Jones has proposed to do a re-reservation whenever a +reservation is issued to a shipment, considering that (like in this scenario) +shipments may occur in a different order than reservations. + +In fact, when new inventory is received a re-reservation is already done for +all OIIR that are associated to inventory items (of the same product) that have +negative ATP. +In a similar way, when we issue a OIIR, we could do a re-reservation for all +the OIIR associated to the inventory item.</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>92</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jonesde</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040416115022</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>E-Commerce</subcomponent> + <reporter>holivier</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-16 06:35:41</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Simple Update for localization</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>holivier</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-16 06:35:41</issue_when> + <thetext>In the ecommerce component +2 UiLabels change (the # is now in the label) +and some french UiLabel correction</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>holivier</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-16 06:38:00</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=42) +the Ecommerce UiLabel patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-16 11:50:22</issue_when> + <thetext>Patch is in CVS. Thanks for doing these Olivier.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>42</attachid> + <date>2004-03-16 06:38:00</date> + <desc>the Ecommerce UiLabel patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>EcommerceUiLabel.update.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>165</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>holivier</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/42/EcommerceUiLabel.update.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>holivier</user> + <when>2004-03-16 06:38:00</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=42) +the Ecommerce UiLabel patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:04:15</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-16 11:50:22</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-16 11:50:22</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>93</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jonesde</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040416115029</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>holivier</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-16 08:00:55</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Simple Update for localization</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>holivier</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-16 08:00:55</issue_when> + <thetext>Order component, some french UiLabels correction</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>holivier</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-16 08:02:07</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=43) +The OrderUilabel properties patch file +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-16 11:50:29</issue_when> + <thetext>Patch is in CVS. Thanks for doing these Olivier.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>43</attachid> + <date>2004-03-16 08:02:07</date> + <desc>The OrderUilabel properties patch file</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>OrderUilabelCorrection.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>165</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>holivier</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/43/OrderUilabelCorrection.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>holivier</user> + <when>2004-03-16 08:02:07</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=43) +The OrderUilabel properties patch file +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:04:26</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-16 11:50:29</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-16 11:50:29</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>94</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jonesde</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040416115037</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Party</subcomponent> + <reporter>holivier</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-16 09:28:27</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Simple Update for localization</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>holivier</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-16 09:28:27</issue_when> + <thetext>simple french correction & translation in the Party and workeffort components</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>holivier</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-16 09:29:26</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=44) +the PartyUiLabel correction patch file +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>holivier</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-16 09:30:03</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=45) +the workeffortUilabel correction patch file +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-16 11:50:37</issue_when> + <thetext>Patch is in CVS. Thanks for doing these Olivier.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>44</attachid> + <date>2004-03-16 09:29:26</date> + <desc>the PartyUiLabel correction patch file</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>PartyUiLabelCorrection040316.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>165</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>holivier</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/44/PartyUiLabelCorrection040316.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>45</attachid> + <date>2004-03-16 09:30:03</date> + <desc>the workeffortUilabel correction patch file</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>WorkeffortUiLabelCorrection040316.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>165</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>holivier</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/45/WorkeffortUiLabelCorrection040316.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>holivier</user> + <when>2004-03-16 09:29:26</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=44) +the PartyUiLabel correction patch file +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>holivier</user> + <when>2004-03-16 09:30:03</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=45) +the workeffortUilabel correction patch file +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:04:35</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-16 11:50:37</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-16 11:50:37</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>95</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jonesde</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040416115047</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>holivier</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-16 09:32:59</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Simple Update for localization</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>holivier</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-16 09:32:59</issue_when> + <thetext>Product components internationalization and the UiLabel files associated</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>holivier</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-16 09:36:08</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=46) +the patch file for produt bsh, xml, ftl and properties +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-16 11:50:47</issue_when> + <thetext>Patch is in CVS. Thanks for doing these Olivier.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>46</attachid> + <date>2004-03-16 09:36:08</date> + <desc>the patch file for produt bsh, xml, ftl and properties</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>ProductUiLabelMigration040316.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>165</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>holivier</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/46/ProductUiLabelMigration040316.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>holivier</user> + <when>2004-03-16 09:36:08</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=46) +the patch file for produt bsh, xml, ftl and properties +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:04:46</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-16 11:50:47</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-16 11:50:47</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>96</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jonesde</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040730204543</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Security Extensions</subcomponent> + <reporter>holivier</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-16 13:30:49</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Typo error correction in emailPassword (bcc in place of cc)</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>holivier</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-16 13:30:49</issue_when> + <thetext>just a simple typo correction.In the emailPassword method when reading and +populated the service fields they was an error. + serviceContext.put("sendBcc", productStoreEmail.get("ccAddress")); +I have change cc to bcc</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>holivier</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-16 13:31:26</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=47) +the patch file +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-30 20:45:43</issue_when> + <thetext>this has already been fixed in cvs.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>47</attachid> + <date>2004-03-16 13:31:26</date> + <desc>the patch file</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>EmailPassword040316.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>165</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>holivier</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/47/EmailPassword040316.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>holivier</user> + <when>2004-03-16 13:31:26</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=47) +the patch file +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-03-18 12:04:54</when> + <field_name>version</field_name> + <field_desc>Version</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Pre3.0.0</oldvalue> + <newvalue>CVS</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 20:45:43</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 20:45:43</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>97</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040527234819</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Accounting</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-18 06:59:56</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Error when creating an invoice with billing account payment type.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-18 06:59:56</issue_when> + <thetext>The following error is generated when you try to create an invoice for an order +with payment type == billing account: + +---------------------------------------- +803495[ InvoiceServices.java:583:ERROR] Problems storing invoice items +org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException: Exception occurred in storeAll (while i +nserting: [GenericEntity:InvoiceContactMech][createdTxStamp,2004-03-18 15:29:46. +156(java.sql.Timestamp)][invoiceId,10010(java.lang.String)][contactMechPurposeTy +peId,BILLING_LOCATION(java.lang.String)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2004-03-18 15:29:46. +156(java.sql.Timestamp)][contactMechId,null()][createdStamp,2004-03-18 15:29:46. +977(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedStamp,2004-03-18 15:29:46.977(java.sql.Times +tamp)] (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO INVOICE_CONTACT_ +MECH (INVOICE_ID, CONTACT_MECH_PURPOSE_TYPE_ID, CONTACT_MECH_ID, LAST_UPDATED_ST +AMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, + ?, ?, ?) ([-5005] (at 83): Missing non-NULL value))) +---------------------------------------- + +I think I've tracked down the source of this problem: +the field contactMechId for the billing account entry in BillingAccount entity +is empty.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-26 10:12:53</issue_when> + <thetext>The error happens when no Billing Contact Mechanism is specified in the billing +account. +In order to fix this issue the input field "Billing Contact Mech" in the +EditBillingAccount page should be marked as mandatory. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-27 23:48:19</issue_when> + <thetext>Fixed by changing the code to not try to create that record when the BillingAccount.contactMechId is +empty.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-27 23:48:18</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-27 23:48:18</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>98</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040322173551</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-19 07:41:21</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>New Shipment Plan feature for the shipment process.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-19 07:41:21</issue_when> + <thetext>New Shipment Plan feature for the shipment process. + +In order to support some of the tasks in the manufacturing industry there was +the need of some simple shipment planning functionality: we need to assign a +group of customer order items to a scheduled shipment (but without actually +picking and issuing the items from warehouse). + +The patches in the attached zip file add this functionality to the shipment ui. +This is the list of changes: + +NEW FILES (new page, within the shipment ui, for ShipmentPlan management) + +product/webapp/facility/shipment/EditShipmentPlan.ftl +product/webapp/facility/WEB-INF/actions/shipment/EditShipmentPlan.bsh +product/webapp/facility/WEB-INF/pagedefs/shipment/EditShipmentPlan.xml + +PATCHES +product/webapp/facility/shipment/ShipmentTabBar.ftl (added new link to +EditShipmentPlan page) + +product/webapp/facility/shipment/ShipmentForms.xml (some new forms for the +EditShipmentPlan page) + +product/webapp/facility/WEB-INF/controller.xml (controller definitions for the +EditShipmentPlan page) + +product/webapp/facility/shipment/AddItemsFromOrder.ftl (added some info, also +fixed issues #47 and #55) +product/webapp/facility/WEB-INF/actions/shipment/AddItemsFromOrder.bsh (added +code to get reservations also from shipment plan) + +product/servicedef/services_shipment.xml (definitions for two new services to +add/delete entries in the Shipment Plan) +product/scripts/org/ofbiz/shipment/shipment/ShipmentSerices.xml (implementation +of the two new services) + +product/entitydef/entitygroup.xml (declaration of the new entity ShipmentPlan) +product/entitydef/entitymodel_shipment.xml (definition of the new entity +ShipmentPlan) + +product/config/ProductUiLabels.properties (some new labels) +product/config/ProductUiLabels_fr.properties (some new labels in ENGLISH)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-19 07:42:41</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=48) +The patches and new files +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-22 17:35:51</issue_when> + <thetext>This patch is now in place. Thanks for sending it in Jacopo. BTW, for future patches a consolidated +patch file is nice.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>application/x-compressed</mimetype> + <attachid>48</attachid> + <date>2004-03-19 07:42:41</date> + <desc>The patches and new files</desc> + <ispatch></ispatch> + <filename>ShipmentPlan.zip</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/48/ShipmentPlan.zip</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-03-19 07:42:41</when> + <field_name>attachments.thedata</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment Data</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=48) +The patches and new files +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-22 17:35:51</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-03-22 17:35:51</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>99</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040806160304</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-28 01:13:10</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>New html report that shows inventory availability by product</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-28 01:13:10</issue_when> + <thetext>This is a new html report (patches are in the attached zip file) for the +Facility Manager Application that shows info about stock levels and +reservations from a product point of view (instead of inventory item). +The action code is very simple (the bsh action calls a service to +compute atp and qoh per product); the report is formatted by the form widget +stuff. +It is not internationalized. +In my local setup I've added a link to it from the Inventory Item page but fell +free to modify it and put it where you want.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-28 01:14:46</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=49) +Files and patches for the new report. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-06 16:03:04</issue_when> + <thetext>Okay, this is in CVS, and I added a link to it from the facility inventory items page. Thanks for sending +this over.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>application/x-compressed</mimetype> + <attachid>49</attachid> + <date>2004-03-28 01:14:46</date> + <desc>Files and patches for the new report.</desc> + <ispatch></ispatch> + <filename>inventory_report.zip</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/49/inventory_report.zip</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-03-28 01:14:46</when> + <field_name>attachments.thedata</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment Data</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=49) +Files and patches for the new report. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-08-06 16:03:04</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-08-06 16:03:04</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>100</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>REL 3.0.0</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040403232241</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>E-Commerce</subcomponent> + <reporter>dlouzado</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-03-28 13:50:10</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>crash on Shipping Information page</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>dlouzado</who> + <issue_when>2004-03-28 13:50:10</issue_when> + <thetext>I was logged as "admin" user and buying something on the test store on ofbiz +instance running on a standalone machine (no connection with the internet). + +I was filling the shipping information and when I clicked 'continue' the +following exception was thrown: + + +"org.ofbiz.base.util.GeneralException: JPublish execution error (BeanShell +script error: Sourced file: +C:\jtools\ofbiz\components\ecommerce\webapp\ecommerce\WEB-INF\actions\order\optionsettings.bsh +: Error in method invocation: Attempt to pass void argument (position 0) to +method: getContactMechByType : at Line: 65 : in file: +C:\jtools\ofbiz\components\ecommerce\webapp\ecommerce\WEB-INF\actions\order\optionsettings.bsh +: ContactHelper .getContactMechByType ( party , "EMAIL_ADDRESS" , false ) +BSF info: +C:\jtools\ofbiz\components\ecommerce\webapp\ecommerce\WEB-INF\actions\order\optionsettings.bsh +at line: 0 column: 0)"</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-03 23:22:41</issue_when> + <thetext>Fixed so that "party" would exist where it is referenced there.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-03 23:22:41</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-03 23:22:41</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>101</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P5</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040730152858</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Content</subcomponent> + <reporter>eckardjf</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-02 09:44:46</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>https Website Settings Ignored</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>eckardjf</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-02 09:44:46</issue_when> + <thetext>org.ofbiz.content.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest() checks to see if a request should be +secure, but is not - and will redirect to a secure url if necessary. However, when rewriting the url to +make it secure, it does not check the website settings for the enableHttps, httpsHost and httpsPort. It +uses the global defaults from url.properties instead, which means the website settings have no effect.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-30 15:28:58</issue_when> + <thetext>this has now been corrected in CVS.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:43:50</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 15:28:58</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 15:28:58</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>102</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>REL 3.0.0</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040403233556</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity Extensions</subcomponent> + <reporter>jonesde</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-03 23:35:56</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Easy way to disabling Entity Sync oriented information</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-03 23:35:56</issue_when> + <thetext>Need an easy way to disable the saving of Entity Sync oriented information such as the entity remove +information. May not want to disable the auto tx and individual timestamps because they are used in +other code that takes advantage of the fact that they are always present (though we still need to get rid +of the last updated and created timestamps that were added to various entities).</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>103</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P1</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040405070601</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Accounting</subcomponent> + <reporter>bryce_nz</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-05 00:05:28</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Nasty little error in PaymentGatewayServices</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>bryce_nz</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 00:05:28</issue_when> + <thetext>In PaymentGatewayServices.refundPayment there is a section of code for creating +the payment for the refund, then at line 1255 there is the following: + + Map result = ServiceUtil.returnSuccess(); + result.put("paymentId", "10000"); + return result; + +Obviously the payment id being returned shouldn't be hardcoded in, should read: + + Map result = ServiceUtil.returnSuccess(); + result.put("paymentId", paymentId); + return result;</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 07:06:01</issue_when> + <thetext>This has been corrected in CVS, thank you.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 07:05:36</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 07:06:01</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 07:06:01</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>104</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040405134511</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Workflow</subcomponent> + <reporter>elfring</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-05 13:22:20</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Job Definition</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>elfring</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 13:22:20</issue_when> + <thetext>This request might fit to the section "Service Engine Tools" on the page +"http://ofbiz.org/feature-list.html". + +Would you like to support the JDF +standard? +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Job_Definition_Format</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 13:45:11</issue_when> + <thetext>Not sure what this is supposed to be requesting. This issue contains no specific feature request.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 13:45:11</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 13:45:11</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>105</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040405134741</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Service</subcomponent> + <reporter>elfring</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-05 13:28:41</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Support for dynamic Service Configuration</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>elfring</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 13:28:41</issue_when> + <thetext>Would you like to use a service configurator for your server? +- +http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-papers.html +- +http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/jmx/tutorial/tutorialTOC.html + +Can this +request solved with JMX? +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Management_eXtensions</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 13:47:41</issue_when> + <thetext>This issue contains no specific feature request. Not sure what you are requesting, so there is no way to +determine if JMX will solve the problem. </thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 13:47:41</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 13:47:41</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>106</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040405134845</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>WebTools</subcomponent> + <reporter>elfring</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-05 13:42:12</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Portlet Interface</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>elfring</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 13:42:12</issue_when> + <thetext>Would you like to integrate components with web portals? + +- +http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-09-2003/jw-0905-portlet2.html +- +http://www.javaworld.net/javaworld/jw-11-2003/jw-1114-jsfredux.html +- +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portlet</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 13:48:45</issue_when> + <thetext>Sure we would love to integrate with web portals, however this issue contains no specific feature +request.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 13:48:45</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 13:48:45</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>107</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040405135106</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>WebTools</subcomponent> + <reporter>elfring</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-05 13:47:12</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Vector graphics and XForms</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>elfring</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 13:47:12</issue_when> + <thetext>Will the application support .svgz or .x3dz files that contain XForms? + +- +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalable_Vector_Graphics +- +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X3D +- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XForms +- +http://xml.apache.org/batik/ + +See also the request "XForms" in the discussion forum by +Britton LaRoche from "August 28, 2003 12:38:36 AM +GMT". +https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectForumMessageView?forumID=282&messageID=1065</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 13:51:06</issue_when> + <thetext>This issue contains no specific feature request. No information was provided regarding how support for +these file types is desired and where the desired functionality is needed. </thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 13:51:06</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 13:51:06</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>108</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040405140048</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Rules</subcomponent> + <reporter>elfring</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-05 13:51:31</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Integration with Knowledge Representation</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>elfring</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 13:51:31</issue_when> + <thetext>What is the current state of your support for this technology? +- +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_representation +- +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_system</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 14:00:48</issue_when> + <thetext>This issue is not a valid feature request, questions of this sort should be discussed on the mailing lists. +In addition, do expect readers to follow links and read articles to get your point across it is highly +unlikely that people will spent the time to research something for you. Your best bet is to read the +articles and post a question asking something specific, then your chances of getting an intelligent +response is greater.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 14:00:48</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 14:00:48</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>109</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040405140138</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Service</subcomponent> + <reporter>elfring</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-05 13:52:57</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Open Services Gateway</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>elfring</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 13:52:57</issue_when> + <thetext>Would you like to cooperate with these service APIs so that your software can be used over these +interfaces? +http://www.osgi.org/about/faqs.asp +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSGi</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 14:01:37</issue_when> + <thetext>This issue contains no specific feature request.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 14:01:37</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 14:01:37</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>110</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040405140228</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity</subcomponent> + <reporter>elfring</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-05 13:56:20</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Content Storage API</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>elfring</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 13:56:20</issue_when> + <thetext>Would you like to support the programming interface "Content +Repository"? +http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=170 + +This topic can be perhaps combined +with requests for CVS and Subversion integration.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 14:02:28</issue_when> + <thetext>This issue contains no specific feature request; please see issue #108 for more suggestions.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 14:02:28</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 14:02:28</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>111</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040405140305</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Workflow</subcomponent> + <reporter>elfring</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-05 14:02:16</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Workflow Management</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>elfring</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 14:02:17</issue_when> + <thetext>How do you think about workflow modelling patterns? +Which of them are supported by your +software? (Is cooperation with other standards like BPML besides WfMC XPDL +possible?) +http://tmitwww.tm.tue.nl/research/patterns/</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 14:03:05</issue_when> + <thetext>see issue #108</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 14:03:05</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 14:03:05</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>112</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040405141257</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity Extensions</subcomponent> + <reporter>elfring</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-05 14:07:40</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>relationships and object mapping</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>elfring</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 14:07:40</issue_when> + <thetext>I've got the impression from the discussion about the topic "entity-engine: thoughts on extends +(IS A) pattern and relationships" that there might be something useful from other information +sources. + +1. CORBA: Relationship Service +Specification +http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/relationship_service.htm + +2. +ObJectRelationalBridge +http://db.apache.org/ojb/ + +3. alternative open source +implementation for JDO +http://speedo.objectweb.org/ + +4. Citations from +CiteSeer +http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cis?q=object+and+relational+and+mapping+and+database + +5. +a detailed Wiki +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_database + +Would you like to reuse +anything from those implementations and experiences? + +How does your use of the Java Open +Transaction Manager (http://jotm.objectweb.org/) fit into this picture?</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-05 14:12:57</issue_when> + <thetext>No specific enhancement requested.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 14:12:57</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-04-05 14:12:57</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>113</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>WORKSFORME</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040406101817</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>WebTools</subcomponent> + <reporter>ajzeneski</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-06 07:00:29</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>EditEntity.jsp displays wrong field length</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-06 07:00:29</issue_when> + <thetext>Reported by prozelit@yahoo.com: + +On EditEntity.jsp, there is a fields table. It is +supposed to display the length of each field, but it +looks like it displays the length of the field name +instead. It seems to me there is a bug at line 347.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-06 10:18:17</issue_when> + <thetext> +This is the expected behavior. The length in parenthesis there is meant to show you the length of the +column name so that you can tell if it is within the required length of the database, we generally +recommend (and always use) equal or less than 30 characters.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-06 10:18:17</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-06 10:18:17</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>WORKSFORME</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>114</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040406100126</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>WorkEffort</subcomponent> + <reporter>vivalinux</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-06 10:01:26</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc>http://<ofbiz_URL>/workeffort/control/month?start=1083297600000</issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Daylight savings and the calendar</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>vivalinux</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-06 10:01:26</issue_when> + <thetext>On the months when daylight savings takes place, or stops taking place +(April/September in the US), the way the start of the period is computed in the +WorkEffortServices.getWorkEffortsByPeriod yields one extra hour after dayligh +savings kicks in. +The reason for this is that the absolute time is interpreted differently once +daylight savings is in place. +So I suggest using the attached patch which relies on UtilDateTime.getDayStart +to get the period start/end.</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>115</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040730150719</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>lykins</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-06 13:56:51</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Product to Order Lookup Link</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>lykins</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-06 13:56:51</issue_when> + <thetext>Something that should bring great benefit is the ability to link the product to +the orders from the product maintenance screen. It would be very beneficial to +know what purchase order the product came from. I noticed that there are links +to almost all other relations besides this. + +Thanks, +Patrick</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-30 15:07:19</issue_when> + <thetext>good idea; now in CVS</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 15:07:19</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 15:07:19</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>116</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040417174533</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-17 00:19:59</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Implementation of getProductVariant service.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-17 00:19:59</issue_when> + <thetext>Implementation of getProductVariant service.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-17 00:20:48</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=50) +Patch for the java implementation +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-17 00:21:21</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=51) +Patch for the service definition. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-17 17:45:33</issue_when> + <thetext>It's in. Thanks Jacopo.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>50</attachid> + <date>2004-04-17 00:20:48</date> + <desc>Patch for the java implementation</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>ProductServices.java.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/50/ProductServices.java.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>51</attachid> + <date>2004-04-17 00:21:21</date> + <desc>Patch for the service definition.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>services.xml.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/51/services.xml.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-04-17 00:20:48</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=50) +Patch for the java implementation +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-04-17 00:21:21</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=51) +Patch for the service definition. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-17 17:45:33</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-17 17:45:33</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>117</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P1</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040422201817</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Accounting</subcomponent> + <reporter>colt_nz</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-20 14:45:56</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>editPayment has wrongly named fields</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>colt_nz</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-20 14:45:56</issue_when> + <thetext>/accounting/webapp/accounting/payment/editPayment.ftl + +Input fields partyIdTo and partyIdFrom are round the wrong way. ie switch 'em.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-22 20:18:17</issue_when> + <thetext> +Thanks for reporting this, the fix is in CVS. Looks like it was perhaps an issue with the i18n...</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-22 20:18:17</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-22 20:18:17</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>118</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040819001212</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>jonesde</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-23 21:32:35</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Make QuickAddVariants Easier to Use</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-23 21:32:35</issue_when> + <thetext>Make QuickAddVariants Easier to Use: + +1. Change to multi-form +2. Allow enter pattern to use to pre-populate the various IDs</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-19 00:12:11</issue_when> + <thetext>Some time ago I did this and you put all the stuff in CVS, so now it's done.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-08-19 00:12:10</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-08-19 00:12:10</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>119</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jacopo</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040717041328</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Manufacturing</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-24 00:15:36</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Refactoring of the BOMEvent class that manages all the related to bill of materials editing.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-24 00:15:36</issue_when> + <thetext>Refactoring of the BOMEvent class that manages all the related to bill of +materials editing. + +Three new (simple) services should be created (create, update, delete). +An sECA rule should be added to the create and update services to update the +low level code.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-17 04:13:28</issue_when> + <thetext>Ok, the BOMEvent class has gone away; I have implemented some simple services +to add/update/remove/copy boms (performing all the needed checks for loops and +updating the product's llc). +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-07-17 04:13:28</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-07-17 04:13:28</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>120</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jacopo</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040424001903</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Manufacturing</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-24 00:19:03</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>searchDuplicateAncenstor service should resolve also virtual to variant products to search for loops.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-24 00:19:03</issue_when> + <thetext>searchDuplicateAncenstor service should resolve also virtual to variant +products to search for loops.</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>121</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jacopo</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040717041557</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Manufacturing</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-24 00:24:11</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Refactoring of the Bill of Material editor's ui: migration to the forms widget.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-24 00:24:11</issue_when> + <thetext>Refactoring of the Bill of Material editor's ui: migration to the forms widget. + +This will also include: +- i18n and l10n issues +- management of all the relavant fields that are missing +- lookup fields +- fields validation</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-17 04:15:57</issue_when> + <thetext>I have not used the form widget (maybe in the future, together with some more +clean ups) here, but most of these points has been fixed.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-07-17 04:15:57</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-07-17 04:15:57</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>122</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jacopo</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040424002537</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Manufacturing</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-24 00:25:37</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>updateLowLevelCode service - it should also update the low level code for variant products </short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-24 00:25:37</issue_when> + <thetext>updateLowLevelCode service - it should also update the low level code for +variant products</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>123</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040501062848</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-29 16:05:20</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Add methods to check against classes, instead of only objects.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:05:20</issue_when> + <thetext>This patch adds new versions of interfaceOf, isOrSubOf, and instanceOf, that +check against a class, instead of an Object.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:06:57</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=52) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:52</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-01 06:28:48</issue_when> + <thetext>This is now in CVS, thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>52</attachid> + <date>2004-04-29 16:06:57</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>ObjectType-check-against-class.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/52/ObjectType-check-against-class.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:06:57</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=52) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:15:14</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>DEFECT</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:52</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 06:28:48</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 06:28:48</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>124</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040501062855</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-29 16:08:48</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Handle is-* operators when value1 is null</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:08:48</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:09:11</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=53) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:53</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-01 06:28:55</issue_when> + <thetext>This is now in CVS, thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>53</attachid> + <date>2004-04-29 16:09:11</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>ObjectType-is-compare-value1-null.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/53/ObjectType-is-compare-value1-null.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:09:11</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=53) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:15:14</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>DEFECT</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:53</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 06:28:55</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 06:28:55</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>125</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040501062903</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-29 16:10:04</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Convert classnames to full names.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:10:04</issue_when> + <thetext>See $summary.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:10:21</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=54) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:48</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-01 06:29:03</issue_when> + <thetext>This is now in CVS, thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>54</attachid> + <date>2004-04-29 16:10:21</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>ObjectType-convert-classname-to-full.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/54/ObjectType-convert-classname-to-full.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:10:21</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=54) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:15:13</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>DEFECT</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:48</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 06:29:03</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 06:29:03</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>126</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040501062243</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-29 16:13:25</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Add some helper methods for objects implementing their own equals, compareTo, and hashCode</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:13:25</issue_when> + <thetext>Name: UtilObject.patch +Prune: 1 +Description: Add some helper methods for objects implementing their own equals, +compareTo, and hashCode. +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilObject.java | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++ + 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:13:45</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=55) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:49</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-01 06:22:43</issue_when> + <thetext>This is now in CVS, thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>55</attachid> + <date>2004-04-29 16:13:45</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilObject.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/55/UtilObject.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:13:45</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=55) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:15:13</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>DEFECT</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:49</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 06:22:43</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 06:22:43</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>127</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040501055554</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-29 16:18:14</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Simplify the top-level build.xml</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:18:14</issue_when> + <thetext>Name: simpler-build.xml.patch +Prune: 1 +Description: Simplifies the top-level build.xml + This patch makes use of ant 1.6 features, to automate calling of sub + build.xmls. It also adds a 'test' target; note, however, that the + listed sub build.xmls don't actually have that test target yet. +DiffStat: + build.xml | 494 ++++---------------------------------------------------------- + 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 462 deletions(-)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:18:43</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=56) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:50</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-01 05:55:54</issue_when> + <thetext>This is now in, thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>56</attachid> + <date>2004-04-29 16:18:43</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>simpler-build.xml.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/56/simpler-build.xml.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:18:43</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=56) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:19:44</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>DEFECT</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ENHANCEMENT</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:50</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 05:55:54</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 05:55:54</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>128</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040501051820</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-29 16:20:39</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Add support for formatting time intervals with human words</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:20:39</issue_when> + <thetext>Name: UtilDateTime-time-interval.patch +Prune: 1 +Description: Add support for formatting time intervals with human words +DiffStat: + base/config/DateTimeLabels.properties | 10 ++ + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilDateTime.java | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++ + 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:20:57</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=57) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:51</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-01 05:18:20</issue_when> + <thetext>These are now in CVS, thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>57</attachid> + <date>2004-04-29 16:20:57</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilDateTime-time-interval.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/57/UtilDateTime-time-interval.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:20:58</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=57) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:51</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 05:18:20</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 05:18:20</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>129</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040429172414</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-29 16:22:10</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Add more childElementList and firstChildElement variants.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:22:10</issue_when> + <thetext>Name: UtilXml-childElementList-firstChildElement.patch +Prune: 1 +Depends: UtilXml-writeElement.patch +Description: Add more childElementList and firstChildElement variants. +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/component/ComponentLoaderConfig.java + | 2 + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilXml.java + | 80 ++++++++++ + components/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/widget/form/ModelFormField.java + | 4 + components/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/model/ModelViewEntity.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/SimpleMethod.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/callops/CallClassMethod.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/callops/CallObjectMethod.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/callops/CreateObject.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/conditional/CombinedCondition.java +| 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/conditional/MasterIf.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/otherops/Calculate.java + | 4 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/otherops/Log.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/operation/MakeInString.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/operation/SimpleMapProcess.java + | 2 + 14 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:22:50</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=58) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:57:47</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority to P2, as I need these applied before I can commit my entity +cache work.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 17:24:14</issue_when> + <thetext>Now in CVS, thanks Adam.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>58</attachid> + <date>2004-04-29 16:22:50</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilXml-childElementList-firstChildElement.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/58/UtilXml-childElementList-firstChildElement.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:22:50</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=58) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:57:47</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-29 17:24:14</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-29 17:24:14</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>130</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040429174623</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-29 16:24:36</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>put now returns the previous value of the object, if it exists</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:24:36</issue_when> + <thetext>Name: UtilCache-put-returns-object.patch +Prune: 1 +Depends: UtilCache-listeners.patch +Description: put now returns the previous value of the object, if it exists +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilCache.java | 16 ++++++++++------ + 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:24:58</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=59) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:57:48</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority to P2, as I need these applied before I can commit my entity +cache work.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 17:46:23</issue_when> + <thetext>Now in CVS, thanks Adam.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>59</attachid> + <date>2004-04-29 16:24:58</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilCache-put-returns-object.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/59/UtilCache-put-returns-object.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:24:58</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=59) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:57:48</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-29 17:46:23</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-29 17:46:23</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>131</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040429174619</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-29 16:55:31</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Add getCacheLineKeys method.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:55:31</issue_when> + <thetext>Name: UtilCache-getCacheLineKeys.patch +Prune: 1 +Depends: UtilCache-put-returns-object.patch +Description: Add getCacheLineKeys method. +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilCache.java | 4 ++++ + 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:55:56</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=60) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 16:57:48</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority to P2, as I need these applied before I can commit my entity +cache work.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 17:46:19</issue_when> + <thetext>Now in CVS, thanks Adam.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>60</attachid> + <date>2004-04-29 16:55:56</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilCache-getCacheLineKeys.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/60/UtilCache-getCacheLineKeys.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:55:56</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=60) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 16:57:48</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-29 17:46:19</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-04-29 17:46:19</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>132</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040501051751</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-29 19:39:13</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Add entrySet(), which functions like Map.entrySet().</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:39:13</issue_when> + <thetext>Name: UtilCache-entrySet.patch +Prune: 1 +Description: Add entrySet(), which functions like Map.entrySet(). +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilCache.java | 4 ++++ + 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:41:28</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=61) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:53</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-01 05:17:51</issue_when> + <thetext>These are now in CVS, thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>61</attachid> + <date>2004-04-29 19:41:27</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilCache-entrySet.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/61/UtilCache-entrySet.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:41:28</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=61) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:53</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 05:17:51</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 05:17:51</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>133</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P1</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040501042628</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-29 19:42:19</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Add a new constructor.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:42:19</issue_when> + <thetext>Name: UtilCache-new-constructor.patch +Prune: 1 +Depends: UtilCache-entrySet.patch +Description: Add a new constructor. +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilCache.java | 13 +++++++++++++ + 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:42:45</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=62) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:48</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-30 10:42:15</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing these issuses, as they are needed by EntityCache.patch.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-01 04:26:28</issue_when> + <thetext>These are now in CVS, thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>62</attachid> + <date>2004-04-29 19:42:45</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilCache-new-constructor.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/62/UtilCache-new-constructor.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:42:45</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=62) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:48</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-30 10:42:15</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P2</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P1</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 04:26:28</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 04:26:28</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>134</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040501062248</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-29 19:43:49</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Change utilCacheTable to a WeakHashMap.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:43:49</issue_when> + <thetext>Name: UtilCache-WeakHashMap.patch +Prune: 1 +Depends: UtilCache-new-constructor.patch +Description: Change utilCacheTable to a WeakHashMap. +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilCache.java | 3 ++- + 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:44:39</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=63) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:49</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-01 06:22:48</issue_when> + <thetext>This is now in CVS, thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>63</attachid> + <date>2004-04-29 19:44:39</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilCache-WeakHashMap.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/63/UtilCache-WeakHashMap.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:44:39</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=63) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:49</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 06:22:48</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 06:22:48</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>135</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P1</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040501042633</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-29 19:45:22</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Methods that clear a cache by name or pattern.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:45:22</issue_when> + <thetext>Name: UtilCache-clearCache-helpers.patch +Prune: 1 +Depends: UtilCache-WeakHashMap.patch +Description: Methods that clear a cache by name or pattern. +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilCache.java | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ + 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:45:43</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=64) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:49</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-30 10:42:16</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing these issuses, as they are needed by EntityCache.patch.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-01 04:26:33</issue_when> + <thetext>These are now in CVS, thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>64</attachid> + <date>2004-04-29 19:45:43</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilCache-clearCache-helpers.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/64/UtilCache-clearCache-helpers.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:45:43</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=64) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:49</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-30 10:42:16</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P2</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P1</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 04:26:33</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 04:26:33</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>136</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040501064335</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-04-29 19:46:54</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Place the loaded document object in a UtilCache instance.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:46:54</issue_when> + <thetext>Name: ResourceLoader-document-in-cache.patch +Prune: 1 +Depends: UtilCache-clearCache-helpers.patch +Description: Place the loaded document object in a UtilCache instance. +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/config/ResourceLoader.java | 11 ++++------- + 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:47:17</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=65) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-04-29 19:57:50</issue_when> + <thetext>Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-01 06:43:35</issue_when> + <thetext>This is now in CVS, thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>65</attachid> + <date>2004-04-29 19:47:17</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>ResourceLoader-document-in-cache.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/65/ResourceLoader-document-in-cache.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:47:17</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=65) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-04-29 19:57:50</when> + <field_name>priority</field_name> + <field_desc>Priority</field_desc> + <oldvalue>P3</oldvalue> + <newvalue>P2</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 06:43:35</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-01 06:43:35</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>137</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040527233355</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Accounting</subcomponent> + <reporter>sichen</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-05-03 14:48:41</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>createInvoiceForOrder not get correct fields for terms</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <has_duplicates> + <issue_id>141</issue_id> + <who>jacopo</who> + <when>2004-05-26 10:48:21</when> + </has_duplicates> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-03 14:48:41</issue_when> + <thetext>InvoiceServices.createInvoiceForOrder is not getting correct fields for terms. +It is not automatically generating a key for InvoiceTerm entity and is also +looking for "termType" from BillingAccount when the field is actually "termTypeId."</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-03 14:50:09</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=66) +Patch fixes defect and allows invoices to be created correctly +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-04 00:50:17</issue_when> + <thetext>See also issue #97</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-26 10:48:20</issue_when> + <thetext>*** Issue 141 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-27 23:33:55</issue_when> + <thetext>It's now in CVS, thanks to both Si Chen and Jacopo Cappellato for reporting/fixing this.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>66</attachid> + <date>2004-05-03 14:50:09</date> + <desc>Patch fixes defect and allows invoices to be created correctly</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>InvoiceServices.java.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>178</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>sichen</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/66/InvoiceServices.java.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>sichen</user> + <when>2004-05-03 14:50:09</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=66) +Patch fixes defect and allows invoices to be created correctly +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-03 23:03:12</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-27 23:33:55</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-05-27 23:33:55</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>138</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>WORKSFORME</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040713022331</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Manufacturing</subcomponent> + <reporter>sichen</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-05-04 17:45:50</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys> + <short_desc>Null delegator in FindProductRun</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-04 17:45:50</issue_when> + <thetext>I am getting a +4269781[ VisitHandler.java:130:ERROR] Could not find delegator with +delegatorName [null] in session, not creating Visit entity + +Is this a Windows problem or a bug? + +Thanks, + +Si Chen</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-04 17:46:33</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=67) +error log from running FindProductRun in Manufacturing +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-13 02:23:31</issue_when> + <thetext>I couldn't recreate this error. +However, from the log it seems something related to the Visit stuff.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>67</attachid> + <date>2004-05-04 17:46:33</date> + <desc>error log from running FindProductRun in Manufacturing</desc> + <ispatch></ispatch> + <filename>findproductrun.log</filename> + <submitter_id>178</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>sichen</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/67/findproductrun.log</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>sichen</user> + <when>2004-05-04 17:46:33</when> + <field_name>attachments.thedata</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment Data</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=67) +error log from running FindProductRun in Manufacturing +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-07-13 02:23:31</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-07-13 02:23:31</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>WORKSFORME</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>139</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>david</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040509064322</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>E-Commerce</subcomponent> + <reporter>arukala</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-05-09 06:43:22</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Reading UiLable Properties in Email templates</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>arukala</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-09 06:43:22</issue_when> + <thetext>Hallo David, + +We are looking for your suggestions. on how should i call the UiLabel +Properties in eCommerce Email Templates. we are eager to see this feature in +email Confirmation after placing an order for customers?. suggest us how to?</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>140</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>jacopo</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040518040000</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Manufacturing</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-05-11 08:26:52</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Remove all the checks against the isVariant field.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-11 08:26:52</issue_when> + <thetext>Remove all the checks against the isVariant field: the best way to see if a +product is variant is to check the ProductAssoc entity.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-18 04:00:00</issue_when> + <thetext>Committed with the last changes a few days ago.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-05-18 04:00:00</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-05-18 04:00:00</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>141</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040526104821</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Accounting</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-05-26 09:01:42</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Patch for bug in invoice creation when terms are specified for a billing account.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <is_duplicate> + <issue_id>137</issue_id> + <who>jacopo</who> + <when>2004-05-26 10:48:21</when> + </is_duplicate> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-26 09:01:42</issue_when> + <thetext>Patch for bug in invoice creation when terms are specified for billing account: +A wrong field name was used. +Also a non-null field was not set.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-26 09:02:49</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=68) +The patch file in UOF +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-05-26 10:48:21</issue_when> + <thetext>Ok, Si Chen had already fixed this!!! + +*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 137 ***</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>68</attachid> + <date>2004-05-26 09:02:49</date> + <desc>The patch file in UOF</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>InvoiceServices.java.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/68/InvoiceServices.java.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-05-26 09:02:49</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=68) +The patch file in UOF +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-05-26 10:48:21</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-05-26 10:48:21</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>DUPLICATE</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>142</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040630194530</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Party</subcomponent> + <reporter>jackhung</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-06-15 03:33:20</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>Linux</op_sys> + <short_desc>Party Profile [New Communication] throws exception</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jackhung</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-15 03:33:20</issue_when> + <thetext>Error: The application script threw an exception: Sourced file: +/mnt/hda6/jackwork/ofbiz3/workspace/ofbiz/components/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/communication/editCommunication.bsh +: null : at Line: 47 : in file: +/mnt/hda6/jackwork/ofbiz3/workspace/ofbiz/components/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/communication/editCommunication.bsh +: party .getRelatedOne ( "Person" ) Target exception: +java.lang.NullPointerException: Null Pointer in Method Invocation BSF info: +/mnt/hda6/jackwork/ofbiz3/workspace/ofbiz/components/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/communication/editCommunication.bsh +at line: 0 column: 0 + + +URL: https://jhpc:18443/partymgr/control/viewCommunicationEvent?partyIdFrom=ltdadmin + +partyId = request.getParameter("party_id"); +... +party = delegator.findByPrimaryKey("Party", UtilMisc.toMap("partyId", partyId)); +context.put("party", party); +context.put("lookupPerson", party.getRelatedOne("Person")); <---</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-30 19:45:30</issue_when> + <thetext>This has been fixed in CVS</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-06-15 03:39:27</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:45:30</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:45:30</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>143</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040630194322</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>sichen</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>FEATURE</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-06-17 10:51:48</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Allows orders to have shipBeforeDate and shipAfterDate</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-17 10:51:48</issue_when> + <thetext>Changed ShoppingCart.java and CheckoutHelper.java to allow ship before and +after dates to be set using the OrderShipmentPreference entity. +OrderServices.java is modified as well to allow these dates to go on the order +confirmation email.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-17 10:53:16</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=69) +Patches ShoppingCart.java, CheckoutHelper.java, OrderServices.java, +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>69</attachid> + <date>2004-06-17 10:53:16</date> + <desc>Patches ShoppingCart.java, CheckoutHelper.java, OrderServices.java,</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>order_dating_patch.txt</filename> + <submitter_id>178</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>sichen</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/69/order_dating_patch.txt</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>sichen</user> + <when>2004-06-17 10:53:16</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=69) +Patches ShoppingCart.java, CheckoutHelper.java, OrderServices.java, +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:43:22</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:43:22</when> + <field_name>short_desc</field_name> + <field_desc>Summary</field_desc> + <oldvalue>Allows orders to have shipBeforeDate and shipAfterDate </oldvalue> + <newvalue>Allows orders to have shipBeforeDate and shipAfterDate</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>144</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>WORKSFORME</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040630194017</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>jackhung</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-06-18 02:57:10</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>Linux</op_sys> + <short_desc>https connection broke Mozilla 1.3 and 1.4</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jackhung</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-18 02:57:10</issue_when> + <thetext>I'm getting a strange problem lately (2 days). I'm at the ecommerce's main page +and try to [Login] (url +https://www.myhost.net:8443/ecommerce/control/checkLogin/main). The +certification stuff comes up and I accepted it. On one of my system using +Mozilla 1.3, the browser popup a dialog saying: + "www.myhost.net has received an incorrect or unexpected message. Error Code: +-12229" +For all subsequent attempt, the browser popup a dialog saying: + "The Document contains no data" +It appears that the browser is not sending any request to the server on +subsequent attempt. + +On another system using Mozilla 1.4, i did not get the "unexpected message", but +still got the "no data" one. + +I have an Crozilla 1.3a browser around (from the Mozilla SVG project). I tried +it and it works!! + +As a matter of fact, i'm having the same problem with any of the secure +components (webtools, partymgr, ...)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-30 19:40:17</issue_when> + <thetext>I cannot duplicate this issue with FireFox. It could be a bug in that version of mozilla. Is this still an +issue w/ the 1.5-1.7?</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:40:17</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:40:17</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>WORKSFORME</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>145</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040619093839</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Party</subcomponent> + <reporter>sichen</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-06-18 09:57:41</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Fixes duplicated PartyContactMechPurposes when using updatePartyContactMech</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-18 09:57:41</issue_when> + <thetext>Fixes duplicated PartyContactMechPurposes when using updatePartyContactMech to +move a party's contact information from an old contactMechId to a +newContactMechId by checking to make sure the PartyContactMechPurpose does not +already exist.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-18 09:58:34</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=70) +Patches PartyContactMechServices.xml +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-19 09:38:39</issue_when> + <thetext>It's in CVS now. Thanks Si.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>70</attachid> + <date>2004-06-18 09:58:34</date> + <desc>Patches PartyContactMechServices.xml</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>PartyContactMechServices.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>178</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>sichen</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/70/PartyContactMechServices.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>sichen</user> + <when>2004-06-18 09:58:34</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=70) +Patches PartyContactMechServices.xml +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-06-19 09:38:39</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-06-19 09:38:39</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>146</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040622094557</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Party</subcomponent> + <reporter>sichen</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-06-21 17:56:29</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Passes partyId into updatePostalAddress from updatepartyPostalAddress</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-21 17:56:29</issue_when> + <thetext>Passes partyId into updatePostalAddress from updatePartyPostalAddress, to +preserve it for updateCreditCard later.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-21 17:57:02</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=71) +Passes partyId from updatePartyPostalAddress to updatePostalAddress +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-22 09:45:57</issue_when> + <thetext>It's in. Thanks Si Chen.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>71</attachid> + <date>2004-06-21 17:57:02</date> + <desc>Passes partyId from updatePartyPostalAddress to updatePostalAddress</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>PartyContactMechServices.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>178</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>sichen</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/71/PartyContactMechServices.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>sichen</user> + <when>2004-06-21 17:57:02</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=71) +Passes partyId from updatePartyPostalAddress to updatePostalAddress +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-06-22 09:45:57</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-06-22 09:45:57</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>147</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040623161518</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>sichen</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-06-22 15:58:48</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Minor additions to calculateProductPrice</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-22 15:58:48</issue_when> + <thetext>Implements a "Percent of Default Price" price action for price rules and checks +both default and list prices when there is a "Promotional Price Override" price +action.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-22 15:59:22</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=72) +minor additions to calculateProductPrice +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-23 16:15:18</issue_when> + <thetext>Okay, this patch is in. Thanks for working on this and sending it over Si.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>72</attachid> + <date>2004-06-22 15:59:22</date> + <desc>minor additions to calculateProductPrice</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>calculateProductPrice.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>178</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>sichen</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/72/calculateProductPrice.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>sichen</user> + <when>2004-06-22 15:59:22</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=72) +minor additions to calculateProductPrice +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-06-23 16:15:18</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-06-23 16:15:18</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>148</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>WORKSFORME</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040730233418</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Accounting</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-06-23 05:42:27</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Duplicate invoices for the same order under some cicumstances.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-23 05:42:27</issue_when> + <thetext>With "Offline Payments", from the order detail page it is possible to +receive payments: when the payments cover the order's grand total an invoice +is generated; also when the shipment to which the order is issued changes +its status to PACKED an invoice is created: this can cause the creation +of two different invoices for the same order.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-30 21:11:52</issue_when> + <thetext>I cannot duplicate this problem; I attempted an offline order, received the payment - no invoice was +created; issued a quick ship a single invoice was created. Please provide more details.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-30 23:34:18</issue_when> + <thetext>I cannot believe... I have tried again and the problem is gone away. +However I'm totally sure (99%) that this was an issue... +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-06-23 16:16:30</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-07-30 23:34:18</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-07-30 23:34:18</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>WORKSFORME</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>149</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040818085225</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-06-26 01:51:16</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Patch for bug that happens when you try to cancel an order item.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-26 01:51:16</issue_when> + <thetext>In revision 1.30 of the services.xml file for the order component, the require- +new-transaction="true" was added to the resetGrandTotal service: this causes +problems when you cancel an order item because the resetGrandTotal is one of +the services that are triggered and it seems to hang up the process waiting for +a transaction (at least this happens with SAP-DB). + +The attached patch removes the require-new-transaction="true" parameter and +this solves the problem; however I don't know if this could cause other +problems in different parts of the system.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-26 01:51:58</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=73) +Patch in UOF +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-18 08:52:25</issue_when> + <thetext>The patch has been applied.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>73</attachid> + <date>2004-06-26 01:51:58</date> + <desc>Patch in UOF</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>services.xml.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/73/services.xml.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-06-26 01:51:58</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=73) +Patch in UOF +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-08-18 08:52:25</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-08-18 08:52:25</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>150</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040630190556</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-06-26 01:56:29</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>When you receive a purchase order the order lines are declared completed (also multiple times) even if it's not true.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-26 01:56:29</issue_when> + <thetext>The attached patch fixes two bugs that caused the problem.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-26 01:56:53</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=74) +Tha patch in UOF +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-30 19:05:56</issue_when> + <thetext>patch applied to CVS</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>74</attachid> + <date>2004-06-26 01:56:53</date> + <desc>Tha patch in UOF</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>OrderSimpleMethods.xml.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/74/OrderSimpleMethods.xml.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-06-26 01:56:53</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=74) +Tha patch in UOF +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:05:56</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:05:56</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>151</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040630224402</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-06-26 02:01:14</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>In order entry, if no party is selected, during the checkout process some errors are generated: this patch fix the problem by disabling the checkout link if the party is missing.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-26 02:01:14</issue_when> + <thetext>In order entry, if no party is selected, during the checkout process some +errors are generated: this patch fix the problem by disabling the checkout link +if the party is missing.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-26 02:01:41</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=75) +Patch in UOF +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-30 19:19:39</issue_when> + <thetext>I cannot duplicate this issue; is it still a problem?</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-30 22:44:02</issue_when> + <thetext>Hmmm, now it seems to work for me, too. +I'm wondering if something is changed during the last 10 days... I was quite +sure about this problem. +By the way, I'm going to declare resolved this issue, thanks. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>75</attachid> + <date>2004-06-26 02:01:41</date> + <desc>Patch in UOF</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>noparty.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/75/noparty.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-06-26 02:01:41</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=75) +Patch in UOF +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-06-30 22:44:02</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-06-30 22:44:02</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>152</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution>LATER</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040630192805</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>jacopo</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-06-26 02:13:57</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Shipping location is missing in purchase orders: this causes problems when you try to cancel an order item.</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-26 02:13:57</issue_when> + <thetext>In purchase order the shipping location address is not set and this causes +problems when you try to cancel order items (the shipping location is used is +some service that are triggered in this situation, such as the calcTax service +etc...). +In my opinion the best solution is to add a shipping location address to the +purchase order. +The address could be that of the facility that will receive the po. + +I have also attached a patch (not a good one, so probably you shouldn't apply +it) that fix this problem by allowing, during order entry, to select one of the +addresses of the facility that is linked to the productStore for which the +purchase order is taken: so in the checkinits page the store selection should +be enabled for purchase orders too.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-26 02:14:21</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=76) +Patch in UOF +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-06-30 19:28:05</issue_when> + <thetext>Sounds like there are more issues here. First off most likely tax should not be calculated for purchase +orders; nor should the same shipping charges which apply to sales orders should not apply to purchase +orders. + +I will see what I can do when working on some additional PO enhancements.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>76</attachid> + <date>2004-06-26 02:14:20</date> + <desc>Patch in UOF</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>shipping_address.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>194</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>jacopo</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/76/shipping_address.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-06-26 02:14:22</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=76) +Patch in UOF +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:28:05</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-06-30 19:28:05</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>LATER</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>153</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P5</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040707011403</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Service</subcomponent> + <reporter>eckardjf</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-05 12:19:00</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>purgeOldJobs service leaves artifacts</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>eckardjf</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-05 12:19:00</issue_when> + <thetext>The purgeOldJobs service will remove qualifying JobSandbox entities, but will not remove the related +RuntimeData, RecurrenceInfo and RecurrenceRule entities (even if they are not referenced by an +existing WorkEffort).</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 01:14:03</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>154</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040707150844</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Content</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-06 12:49:26</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Unknown import</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-06 12:49:26</issue_when> + <thetext>Region.java imports com.sun.rsasign.r. When compiling with jikes, this class is +not available. Removing the import, and the class compiles fine, so it's +obviously not needed.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-06 12:49:58</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=77) +Remove the bad import +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-07 15:08:44</issue_when> + <thetext>This import has now been removed, not even sure why it was there in the first place... Thanks Adam.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>77</attachid> + <date>2004-07-06 12:49:58</date> + <desc>Remove the bad import</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>Region.java.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/77/Region.java.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-07-06 12:49:58</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=77) +Remove the bad import +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 15:08:44</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 15:08:44</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>155</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040707011249</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-06 14:27:26</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>UtilCache does not allow for null keys</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-06 14:27:26</issue_when> + <thetext>UtilCache doesn't allow null keys to be stored. This is sub-optimal, and +actually causes problems with my enhanced entity cache code. Attached patch fixes.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-06 14:28:17</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=78) +Allow for null keys +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-07 01:12:49</issue_when> + <thetext>This is now in CVS, thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>78</attachid> + <date>2004-07-06 14:28:17</date> + <desc>Allow for null keys</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilCache-null-key.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/78/UtilCache-null-key.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-07-06 14:28:17</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=78) +Allow for null keys +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 01:12:49</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 01:12:49</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>156</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040707011312</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-06 14:30:09</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Allow specifying the expire time on put in UtilCache</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-06 14:30:09</issue_when> + <thetext>Add a new put method, that takes an expireTime parameter.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-06 14:30:31</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=79) +The patch. +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-07 01:13:12</issue_when> + <thetext>This is now in CVS, thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>79</attachid> + <date>2004-07-06 14:30:31</date> + <desc>The patch.</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilCache-put-takes-expireTime.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/79/UtilCache-put-takes-expireTime.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-07-06 14:30:31</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=79) +The patch. +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 01:13:12</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 01:13:12</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>157</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040707011225</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-06 14:35:33</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>In UtilCache, allow for a list of property bases to be specified</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-06 14:35:33</issue_when> + <thetext>When a UtilCache instance is created, it currently will only look for a single +matching property value, by name. This patch allows for a list of base property +names to be specified, and the first one found will be used. + +I make use of this in my entity cache code. For instance: +== +Cache.entity-list.${delegator-name}.${entity-name}.expireTime=1800000 +Cache.entity-list.${delegator-name}.${entity-name}.maxSize=500 + +# high count, low access +# 5 minute cache time +Cache.entity-list.${delegator-name}.PartyAttribute=300000 +==</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-06 14:35:48</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=80) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-07 01:12:25</issue_when> + <thetext>This is now in CVS, thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>80</attachid> + <date>2004-07-06 14:35:48</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>UtilCache-wildcard-config.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/80/UtilCache-wildcard-config.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-07-06 14:35:48</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=80) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 01:12:25</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 01:12:25</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>158</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040707011838</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>sichen</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-06 17:08:44</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>distinct attribute for getProductFeatures is not working</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-06 17:08:44</issue_when> + <thetext>distinct attribute for getProductFeatures service does not work because it is +trying to use ProductFeatureType rather than ProductFeatureTypeId in +ProductServices.prodGetFeatures</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-06 17:16:51</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=81) +Corrects productFeatureType to productFeatureTypeId +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-07 01:18:38</issue_when> + <thetext>It's in CVS now, thanks Si!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>81</attachid> + <date>2004-07-06 17:16:51</date> + <desc>Corrects productFeatureType to productFeatureTypeId</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>ProductServices_1.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>178</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>sichen</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/81/ProductServices_1.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>sichen</user> + <when>2004-07-06 17:16:51</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=81) +Corrects productFeatureType to productFeatureTypeId +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 01:18:38</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 01:18:38</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>159</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040707012137</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>sichen</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-06 17:26:05</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Adds productFeatureApplTypeId field to getProductFeatureSet service</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-06 17:26:05</issue_when> + <thetext>Adds productFeatureApplTypeId as optional field to getProductFeatureSet service. + If none is specified, it will still search for "SELECTABLE_FEATURE"s (to be +compatible with existing code), but if one is specified, it will use that +productFeatureApplTypeId, so the same service can now be used to search for +STANDARD, DISTINGUISHING, OPTIONAL features.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-06 17:27:49</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=82) +Extends getProductFeatures with optional productFeatureApplTypeId field +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-07 01:21:37</issue_when> + <thetext>It's in CVS now, thanks Si!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>82</attachid> + <date>2004-07-06 17:27:49</date> + <desc>Extends getProductFeatures with optional productFeatureApplTypeId field</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>ProductServices_2.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>178</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>sichen</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/82/ProductServices_2.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>sichen</user> + <when>2004-07-06 17:27:49</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=82) +Extends getProductFeatures with optional productFeatureApplTypeId field +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 01:21:37</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 01:21:37</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>160</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040707144701</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Entity Extensions</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-07 07:27:45</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>implement condition versions of functions in entityext</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-07 07:27:45</issue_when> + <thetext>I had sent an earlier version of this patch to the mailing list. I'm now adding +it as an issue, as I have for all the other patches.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-07 07:28:22</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=83) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-07 14:47:01</issue_when> + <thetext>This is now in CVS. Thanks Adam!</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>83</attachid> + <date>2004-07-07 07:28:22</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>cache-entityext.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/83/cache-entityext.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-07-07 07:28:22</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=83) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 14:47:01</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-07 14:47:01</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>161</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040708153407</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>WebTools</subcomponent> + <reporter>doogie</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-08 11:51:01</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>NPE in FindUtilCacheElements.jsp</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-08 11:51:01</issue_when> + <thetext>Missed one NPE when key is null(calls key.toString()).</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-08 11:51:22</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=84) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-08 15:34:07</issue_when> + <thetext>Thanks Adam, it is now in CVS.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>84</attachid> + <date>2004-07-08 11:51:22</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>FindUtilCacheElements.jsp.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>270</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>doogie</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/84/FindUtilCacheElements.jsp.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>doogie</user> + <when>2004-07-08 11:51:22</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=84) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-08 15:34:07</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-08 15:34:07</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>162</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>WORKSFORME</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040713170819</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Workflow</subcomponent> + <reporter>ktippetts</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-12 09:32:42</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>Linux</op_sys> + <short_desc>NoSuchMethodError in Entity Data Maintenance</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>ktippetts</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-12 09:32:42</issue_when> + <thetext>Getting this error when trying to view entity data in Webtools | Entity Data +Maintenance: + +<snip> +Exception: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError +Message: +org.ofbiz.entity.condition.EntityFieldMap.<init>(Ljava/util/Map;Lorg/ofbiz/entity/condition/EntityOperator;)V +----- stack trace ---------------------------------------- +java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: +org.ofbiz.entity.condition.EntityFieldMap.<init>(Ljava/util/Map;Lorg/ofbiz/entity/condition/EntityOperator;)V +org.apache.jsp.entity.FindGeneric_jsp._jspService(FindGeneric_jsp.java:159) +<snip> + +To duplicate Using CVS code as of 09Jul2004: +* Webtools > Entity Data Maintenance +* Click 'All' on any entity. + +Possible Solution: +* in FindGeneric.jsp (line 94) change 2nd parameter to EntityJoinOperator.AND</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-12 20:41:10</issue_when> + <thetext>This works fine from a clean compile, but if have partial old code and partial new code in a build it may +have problems. Try an "ant clean" and then an "ant".</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>doogie</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-13 17:08:19</issue_when> + <thetext>The signature of the constructor changed. It used to take an EntityOperator. +However, the code only accepted an EntityJoinOperator. Passing in an +EntityComparisonOperator would have caused it to fail. + +Also, running ant clean will *not* fix the problem. The parsed/compiled jsp +pages need to be cleaned out.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-12 20:41:10</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-12 20:41:10</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>WORKSFORME</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>163</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Documentation</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040730150851</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>website</subcomponent> + <reporter>michaelrempel</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>TASK</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-13 11:11:43</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>cant get csv instructions</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>michaelrempel</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-13 11:11:43</issue_when> + <thetext>When I pull up csv instructions for either the wincsv or command line, I get a +logon request screen, even though I am logged on. + +Thx + +Michael Rempel</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-30 15:08:51</issue_when> + <thetext>This is a java.net related issue not OFBiz; please contact the Java.Net team for help.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 15:08:51</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 15:08:51</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>164</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040730204811</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Security</subcomponent> + <reporter>adrianc</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-14 12:24:23</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>SecurityData.xml File</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>adrianc</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-14 12:24:23</issue_when> + <thetext>From mailing list: + +On Jul 14, 2004, at 12:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: + +> I was just wondering... +> +> Why is the security data for ALL components in the SecurityData.xml file? This +file looks monolithic. Shouldn't each component load its own security data? +> +> -Adrian + + +Adrian, + +Yes, good point, monolithic is a good word for this. Ideally it should be split +up, I think that's a good idea. + +If anyone wants to work on this please do... In the mean time it might be a good +idea to create an issue for it. + +-David</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-30 20:48:11</issue_when> + <thetext>applied patch file(s); now in CVS</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 20:48:11</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 20:48:11</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>165</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P4</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040730065021</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>pgoron</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-15 06:34:37</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Allow user to specify default value for desired delivery date and comment fields in order entry GUI</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>pgoron</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-15 06:34:37</issue_when> + <thetext>This patch allows user to define default desired delivery date and default +comment during quickaddform filling in OrderEntry page. Thus, users are not +obliged any more to reinput these informations for each order item.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>pgoron</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-15 06:35:35</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=85) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-30 06:50:21</issue_when> + <thetext>The patch is in CVS.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>85</attachid> + <date>2004-07-15 06:35:35</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>order20040707.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>392</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>pgoron</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/85/order20040707.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>pgoron</user> + <when>2004-07-15 06:35:35</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=85) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-15 16:16:54</when> + <field_name>assigned_to</field_name> + <field_desc>Assigned To</field_desc> + <oldvalue>issues@ofbiz</oldvalue> + <newvalue>ajzeneski</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-07-15 16:16:54</when> + <field_name>issue_type</field_name> + <field_desc>Issue Type</field_desc> + <oldvalue>ENHANCEMENT</oldvalue> + <newvalue>PATCH</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-07-30 06:50:21</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-07-30 06:50:21</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>166</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040730115233</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>pgoron</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-21 02:46:56</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Allow user to associate parties to an order in OrderEntry website</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>pgoron</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-21 02:46:56</issue_when> + <thetext>Hi, + +Currently, I did not found any way to associate additional parties to an order. +That's why I've written this enhancement patch. + + +This patch adds a new step during order entry in which user can associate +additional party&role to order. Then, these informations are stored in OrderRole +entity. + + +List of modifications : +- I've written a new view in which user can select a party and party's role to +associate to order ++ webapp/ordermgr/entry/SetAdditionalParty.ftl ++ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/entry/SetAdditionalParty.bsh ++ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/pagedefs/entry/SetAdditionalParty.xml ++ webapp/ordermgr/entry/AdditionalPartyListing.ftl ++ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/entry/AdditionalPartyListing.bsh ++ webapp/ordermgr/entry/PartySettingsForm.xml +M webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/controller.xml + +- I've included list of additional parties associated to order in confimorder view +M webapp/ordermgr/entry/confirmorder.ftl +M webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/pagedefs/entry/confirmorder.xml + +- I've modified these files so that my view is shown before order confirmation +M src/org/ofbiz/order/shoppingcart/CheckOutEvents.java +M webapp/ordermgr/entry/showcart.ftl + +- I've modified storeOrder service and ShoppingCart to take in account +additional parties. +M servicedef/services.xml +M src/org/ofbiz/order/order/OrderServices.java +M src/org/ofbiz/order/shoppingcart/ShoppingCartEvents.java +M src/org/ofbiz/order/shoppingcart/ShoppingCart.java + +- I've copied some files from content module to be able to use GenericLookup. ++ src/org/ofbiz/order/lookupParams.java ++ webapp/ordermgr/lookup/FieldLookupForms.xml ++ webapp/ordermgr/lookup/GenericLookup.ftl ++ webapp/ordermgr/templates/lookup.ftl ++ webapp/ordermgr/templates/lookup.xml ++ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/includes/findprepLk.bsh ++ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/includes/formprep.bsh ++ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/includes/pagelistprepLk.bsh ++ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/pagedefs/lookup/GenericLookup.xml</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>pgoron</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-21 02:47:42</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=86) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>pgoron</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-22 00:38:39</issue_when> + <thetext>I've found some minor mistakes. I am correcting them and I will send a new patch +as soon as possible.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>pgoron</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-22 01:29:07</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=87) +The corrected patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jacopo</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-30 11:52:33</issue_when> + <thetext>The patches are in CVS.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>86</attachid> + <date>2004-07-21 02:47:42</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>order20040721.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>392</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>pgoron</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/86/order20040721.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>87</attachid> + <date>2004-07-22 01:29:07</date> + <desc>The corrected patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>order20040722.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>392</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>pgoron</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/87/order20040722.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>pgoron</user> + <when>2004-07-21 02:47:42</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=86) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>pgoron</user> + <when>2004-07-22 01:29:07</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=87) +The corrected patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-07-30 11:52:33</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jacopo</user> + <when>2004-07-30 11:52:33</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>167</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040730145814</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Accounting</subcomponent> + <reporter>sichen</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-28 17:15:09</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Fixes a couple of other getNextSeqId methods</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-28 17:15:09</issue_when> + <thetext>getNextSeqId now returns a string(), so .toString() is no longer needed and will +cause runtime exceptions.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-28 17:19:29</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=88) +Changes getNextSeqId usage to PaymentGatewayServices and GenericAsyncEngine +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-30 14:58:14</issue_when> + <thetext>patch applied</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>88</attachid> + <date>2004-07-28 17:19:29</date> + <desc>Changes getNextSeqId usage to PaymentGatewayServices and GenericAsyncEngine</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>changes.txt</filename> + <submitter_id>178</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>sichen</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/88/changes.txt</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>sichen</user> + <when>2004-07-28 17:19:29</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=88) +Changes getNextSeqId usage to PaymentGatewayServices and GenericAsyncEngine +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 14:58:14</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 14:58:14</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>168</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040730144804</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Content</subcomponent> + <reporter>pgoron</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-29 02:43:55</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>FreeMarker localization issues</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>pgoron</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-29 02:43:55</issue_when> + <thetext>Hi, + +This patch resolves some localization issues. Currently, FreeMarker formats +number according to the machine's locale. My patch forces FreeMarker to use the +user session's locale. + +It must be applied in ofbiz/components/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/webapp/ftl +folder.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>pgoron</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-29 02:45:19</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=89) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-30 14:48:04</issue_when> + <thetext>This has been fixed in CVS</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>89</attachid> + <date>2004-07-29 02:45:19</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>locale-freemaker-200040727.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>392</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>pgoron</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/89/locale-freemaker-200040727.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>pgoron</user> + <when>2004-07-29 02:45:19</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=89) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 14:48:04</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 14:48:04</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>169</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040730220642</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>E-Commerce</subcomponent> + <reporter>amheiss</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-07-30 09:53:11</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc>https://localhost:8443/ecommerce/control/finalizeOrder</issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>Linux</op_sys> + <short_desc>Party/Userlogin issues</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>amheiss</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-30 09:53:11</issue_when> + <thetext>Application will not allow run of createPartyPostalAddress (due to null user +login?). Sequence of events from july 30th, 11am build: goto ecommerce, +login, then logout. attempt to use anonymous checkout after this, and shipping +address feilds prepopulated with previous logins settings. After adjusting and +trying to save, get error 'User authorization is required for this service: +createPartyPostalAddress ' . + +Debug output from shipsettings.bsh: +Debug.log("party ID : " + partyId); ---> output admin ( i logged in as admin, +then logged out) +Debug.log("ul: " + session.getAttribute("userLogin")); ---> (null)</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-07-30 22:06:42</issue_when> + <thetext>Yes, if there is an autoUserLogin attribute available that will break anonymous checkout. In theory, the +anonymous checkout links should not be displayed if there is an auto-userlogin. However, I have added +some code to clear this when entering the anonymous checkout process.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 22:06:42</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-07-30 22:06:42</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>170</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040804093020</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>sichen</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>ENHANCEMENT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-08-03 17:02:41</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Optionally duplicates ProductContent when duplicating a Product</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-03 17:02:41</issue_when> + <thetext>Will now optionally duplicate ProductContent entries when duplicating a Product</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-03 17:03:19</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=90) +Patches services.xml, EditProduct.ftl, and ProductServices.xml +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-04 09:30:20</issue_when> + <thetext>Thanks Si. This is now in CVS. I also did a content remove option, and fixed an issue I noticed with the +product IDs (GoodIdentification). BTW, this is from a slightly earlier version of OFBiz than the current +CVS as this form has been moved to the file EditProductDupForm.ftl.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>90</attachid> + <date>2004-08-03 17:03:19</date> + <desc>Patches services.xml, EditProduct.ftl, and ProductServices.xml</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>duplicateProduct.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>178</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>sichen</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/90/duplicateProduct.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>sichen</user> + <when>2004-08-03 17:03:19</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=90) +Patches services.xml, EditProduct.ftl, and ProductServices.xml +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-08-04 09:30:20</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-08-04 09:30:20</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>171</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040804091929</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Product</subcomponent> + <reporter>pgoron</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-08-04 00:59:53</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Comparaison bug in InventoryServices.xml minilang script</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>pgoron</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-04 00:59:53</issue_when> + <thetext>Some if-compare element forget to declare type used to compare fields. By +default, string comparison is used whereas Double is required. + + +Applying patch : +cd /ofbiz/components/product/script/org/ofbiz/product/inventory +patch -p0 < InventoryServices.xml.patch</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>pgoron</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-04 01:01:13</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=91) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-04 09:19:29</issue_when> + <thetext>Thanks, it's now in CVS.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>91</attachid> + <date>2004-08-04 01:01:13</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>InventoryServices.xml.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>392</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>pgoron</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/91/InventoryServices.xml.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>pgoron</user> + <when>2004-08-04 01:01:13</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=91) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-08-04 09:19:29</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-08-04 09:19:29</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>172</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P2</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040819033400</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Order</subcomponent> + <reporter>pgoron</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-08-05 07:09:49</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Bug in shippableWeight calculation from OrderReadHelper.getShippableWeight method</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>pgoron</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-05 07:09:49</issue_when> + <thetext>Hi, + +The purpose of this patch is to solve a bug in +OrderReadHelper.getShippableWeight method. The algorithm of shippable weight +calculation don't care of order item's quantity. So there is an inconsistency +with ShoppingCart.getShippableWeight method when order is modified after his +creation (for example, by RecalcShippingTotal service). + +Applying patch: +cd ofbiz/components/order/src/org/ofbiz/order/order +patch -p0 < OrderReadHelper-20040805.patch + +Peter Goron</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>pgoron</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-05 07:10:36</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=92) +The patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>pgoron</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-19 03:34:00</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=96) +An up to date patch +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>92</attachid> + <date>2004-08-05 07:10:36</date> + <desc>The patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>OrderReadHelper-20040805.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>392</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>pgoron</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/92/OrderReadHelper-20040805.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>96</attachid> + <date>2004-08-19 03:34:00</date> + <desc>An up to date patch</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>OrderReadHelper-200408019.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>392</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>pgoron</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/96/OrderReadHelper-200408019.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>pgoron</user> + <when>2004-08-05 07:10:36</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=92) +The patch +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>pgoron</user> + <when>2004-08-19 03:34:00</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=96) +An up to date patch +</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>173</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>INVALID</resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040809165336</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Startup</subcomponent> + <reporter>mn</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-08-09 13:38:08</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>Linux</op_sys> + <short_desc>typo in base/config/debug.properties</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>mn</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-09 13:38:08</issue_when> + <thetext>Index: base/config/debug.properties +=================================================================== +RCS file: /cvs/ofbiz/base/config/debug.properties,v +retrieving revision 1.10 +diff -u -r1.10 debug.properties +--- base/config/debug.properties 9 Jun 2004 18:12:59 -0000 1.10 ++++ base/config/debug.properties 9 Aug 2004 19:32:33 -0000 +@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ + pack.exception=true + + # These top level switches are used before calling Log4J, or if Log4J is not used +-print.verbose=ftrue ++print.verbose=true + print.timing=true + print.info=true + print.important=true</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>mn</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-09 13:40:09</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=93) +corerct typo for print.verbose property +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>jonesde</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-09 16:25:29</issue_when> + <thetext>In this case "ftrue" is not a misspelling of "true", we add the "f" before "true" so that it is easier to switch +between true and false than it would be to type out "true" and "false". In other words, anything but +"true" is false.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>mn</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-09 16:53:36</issue_when> + <thetext>What about placing comment into debug.properties about this decision?</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>93</attachid> + <date>2004-08-09 13:40:09</date> + <desc>corerct typo for print.verbose property</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>debug.properties.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>377</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>mn</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/93/debug.properties.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>mn</user> + <when>2004-08-09 13:40:09</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=93) +corerct typo for print.verbose property +</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-08-09 16:25:29</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>jonesde</user> + <when>2004-08-09 16:25:29</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>INVALID</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>174</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040810161004</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Accounting</subcomponent> + <reporter>amheiss</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>PATCH</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-08-10 16:08:36</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>retry failed auths fix</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>amheiss</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-10 16:08:36</issue_when> + <thetext>retryFailedAuths service was creating superfluous retryFailedOrderAuth +services. I'll see if i can attach the patch to check on order status before +dispatching retryFailedOrderAuth service. If not, patch will be to dev list +soon enough.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>amheiss</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-10 16:10:04</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=94) +Patch for retryFailedAuth fix +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>94</attachid> + <date>2004-08-10 16:10:04</date> + <desc>Patch for retryFailedAuth fix</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>retryAuth.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>336</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>amheiss</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/94/retryAuth.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>amheiss</user> + <when>2004-08-10 16:10:04</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=94) +Patch for retryFailedAuth fix +</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>175</issue_id> + <issue_status>RESOLVED</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution>FIXED</resolution> + <component>foo</component> + <version>unspecified</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>ajzeneski</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040817213241</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>bar</subcomponent> + <reporter>ajzeneski</reporter> + <target_milestone>milestone 1</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-08-17 21:31:38</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>ajzeneski</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>bar</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-17 21:31:38</issue_when> + <thetext>foo</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>ajzeneski</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-17 21:32:41</issue_when> + <thetext>.</thetext> + </long_desc> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-08-17 21:32:41</when> + <field_name>issue_status</field_name> + <field_desc>Status</field_desc> + <oldvalue>NEW</oldvalue> + <newvalue>RESOLVED</newvalue> + </activity> + <activity> + <user>ajzeneski</user> + <when>2004-08-17 21:32:41</when> + <field_name>resolution</field_name> + <field_desc>Resolution</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>FIXED</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>176</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Components</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>All</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040818174622</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Content</subcomponent> + <reporter>sichen</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>DEFECT</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-08-18 17:45:44</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>All</op_sys> + <short_desc>Possible bug in renderContentAsText</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-18 17:45:44</issue_when> + <thetext>It seems that renderContentAsText is still trying to do a findByAnd on +SubContentDataResourceView with a fromDate as the orderBy, whereas +renderContentAsTextCache no longer does (it passes a null.) We got an +exception from this in ProductContentWrapper and made this change to fix it. +Is this a defect?</thetext> + </long_desc> + <long_desc> + <who>sichen</who> + <issue_when>2004-08-18 17:46:22</issue_when> + <thetext>Created an attachment (id=95) +Changes findByAnd of SubContentDataResourceView +</thetext> + </long_desc> + <attachment encoding='Base64'> + <mimetype>text/plain</mimetype> + <attachid>95</attachid> + <date>2004-08-18 17:46:22</date> + <desc>Changes findByAnd of SubContentDataResourceView</desc> + <ispatch>1</ispatch> + <filename>ContentWorker.patch</filename> + <submitter_id>178</submitter_id> + <submitting_username>sichen</submitting_username> + <data></data> + <attachment_iz_url>https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/95/ContentWorker.patch</attachment_iz_url> + </attachment> + <activity> + <user>sichen</user> + <when>2004-08-18 17:46:22</when> + <field_name>attachments.ispatch</field_name> + <field_desc>Attachment is Patch</field_desc> + <oldvalue></oldvalue> + <newvalue>Created an attachment (id=95) +Changes findByAnd of SubContentDataResourceView +</newvalue> + </activity> +</issue> +<issue status_code="200" status_message="OK"> + <issue_id>177</issue_id> + <issue_status>NEW</issue_status> + <priority>P3</priority> + <resolution></resolution> + <component>Base</component> + <version>CVS</version> + <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform> + <assigned_to>issues@ofbiz</assigned_to> + <delta_ts>20040910075014</delta_ts> + <subcomponent>Base</subcomponent> + <reporter>lrawley</reporter> + <target_milestone>not determined</target_milestone> + <issue_type>TASK</issue_type> + <creation_ts>2004-09-10 07:50:14</creation_ts> + <qa_contact>issues@ofbiz</qa_contact> + <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard> + <issue_file_loc></issue_file_loc> + <votes></votes> + <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys> + <short_desc>HTTP Header needs Expires</short_desc> + <keywords></keywords> + <long_desc> + <who>lrawley</who> + <issue_when>2004-09-10 07:50:14</issue_when> + <thetext>Using Internet Explorer 6.0 with settings for automatically obtaining newer +versions of page. + +Images are cached and if changed are not refreshed on visits to the same page. +Pages get cached with login page because the first time a user requested they +were prompted to login first and then redirected to the page. + +This behavior is resolved if set to obtain newer versions on every visit, +however, this causes performance issues. So, automatically is the desired +browser setting. + +I would like to be able to set the EXPIRE in the HTTP header. I'm not sure +where this change needs to occur. Can you assist? Is this available in 3.0? +I am using 2.1.1. + +Please contact me at lrawley@tla.com. + +Lisa Rawley</thetext> + </long_desc> +</issue> +</issuezilla> |