summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/spec/ruby/language
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeremy Evans <code@jeremyevans.net>2020-03-27 15:08:52 -0700
committerJeremy Evans <code@jeremyevans.net>2020-04-10 00:29:05 -0700
commit900e83b50115afda3f79712310e4cb95e4508972 (patch)
tree07c581a76af2b2e135f034eb52a9e81401e6e131 /spec/ruby/language
parentdefc0ee9d172c2caa8742cc682a8aa389942d6ef (diff)
Turn class variable warnings into exceptions
This changes the following warnings: * warning: class variable access from toplevel * warning: class variable @foo of D is overtaken by C into RuntimeErrors. Handle defined?(@@foo) at toplevel by returning nil instead of raising an exception (the previous behavior warned before returning nil when defined? was used). Refactor the specs to avoid the warnings even in older versions. The specs were checking for the warnings, but the purpose of the related specs as evidenced from their description is to test for behavior, not for warnings. Fixes [Bug #14541]
Notes
Notes: Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2987
Diffstat (limited to 'spec/ruby/language')
-rw-r--r--spec/ruby/language/defined_spec.rb28
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/spec/ruby/language/defined_spec.rb b/spec/ruby/language/defined_spec.rb
index ed61ed3b53..f2da8a9293 100644
--- a/spec/ruby/language/defined_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/ruby/language/defined_spec.rb
@@ -275,9 +275,7 @@ describe "The defined? keyword for an expression" do
end
it "returns nil for an expression with '!' and an unset class variable" do
- -> {
- @result = defined?(!@@defined_specs_undefined_class_variable)
- }.should complain(/class variable access from toplevel/)
+ @result = eval("class singleton_class::A; defined?(!@@doesnt_exist) end", binding, __FILE__, __LINE__)
@result.should be_nil
end
@@ -286,9 +284,7 @@ describe "The defined? keyword for an expression" do
end
it "returns nil for an expression with 'not' and an unset class variable" do
- -> {
- @result = defined?(not @@defined_specs_undefined_class_variable)
- }.should complain(/class variable access from toplevel/)
+ @result = eval("class singleton_class::A; defined?(not @@doesnt_exist) end", binding, __FILE__, __LINE__)
@result.should be_nil
end
@@ -897,17 +893,21 @@ describe "The defined? keyword for a variable scoped constant" do
end
it "returns nil if the class scoped constant is not defined" do
- -> {
- @@defined_specs_obj = DefinedSpecs::Basic
- defined?(@@defined_specs_obj::Undefined).should be_nil
- }.should complain(/class variable access from toplevel/)
+ eval(<<-END, binding, __FILE__, __LINE__)
+ class singleton_class::A
+ @@defined_specs_obj = DefinedSpecs::Basic
+ defined?(@@defined_specs_obj::Undefined).should be_nil
+ end
+ END
end
it "returns 'constant' if the constant is defined in the scope of the class variable" do
- -> {
- @@defined_specs_obj = DefinedSpecs::Basic
- defined?(@@defined_specs_obj::A).should == "constant"
- }.should complain(/class variable access from toplevel/)
+ eval(<<-END, binding, __FILE__, __LINE__)
+ class singleton_class::A
+ @@defined_specs_obj = DefinedSpecs::Basic
+ defined?(@@defined_specs_obj::A).should == "constant"
+ end
+ END
end
it "returns nil if the local scoped constant is not defined" do