diff options
author | Alan Wu <XrXr@users.noreply.github.com> | 2023-09-07 14:56:07 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alan Wu <XrXr@users.noreply.github.com> | 2023-09-12 11:25:07 -0400 |
commit | 39ee3e22bd3d071c1c283b6b8dbd1af413342fb1 (patch) | |
tree | da6a4f4c93d1887d477776b7f4575d5146f702e4 /spec/ruby/core/proc/lambda_spec.rb | |
parent | b90272b3b661bd2fd557332028b8feb568b6b9df (diff) |
Make Kernel#lambda raise when given non-literal block
Previously, Kernel#lambda returned a non-lambda proc when given a
non-literal block and issued a warning under the `:deprecated` category.
With this change, Kernel#lambda will always return a lambda proc, if it
returns without raising.
Due to interactions with block passing optimizations, we previously had
two separate code paths for detecting whether Kernel#lambda got a
literal block. This change allows us to remove one path, the hack done
with rb_control_frame_t::block_code introduced in 85a337f for supporting
situations where Kernel#lambda returned a non-lambda proc.
[Feature #19777]
Co-authored-by: Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@gmail.com>
Notes
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/8405
Diffstat (limited to 'spec/ruby/core/proc/lambda_spec.rb')
-rw-r--r-- | spec/ruby/core/proc/lambda_spec.rb | 8 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/spec/ruby/core/proc/lambda_spec.rb b/spec/ruby/core/proc/lambda_spec.rb index b2d3f50350..5c3c38fc2a 100644 --- a/spec/ruby/core/proc/lambda_spec.rb +++ b/spec/ruby/core/proc/lambda_spec.rb @@ -14,9 +14,11 @@ describe "Proc#lambda?" do Proc.new {}.lambda?.should be_false end - it "is preserved when passing a Proc with & to the lambda keyword" do - suppress_warning {lambda(&->{})}.lambda?.should be_true - suppress_warning {lambda(&proc{})}.lambda?.should be_false + ruby_version_is ""..."3.3" do + it "is preserved when passing a Proc with & to the lambda keyword" do + suppress_warning {lambda(&->{})}.lambda?.should be_true + suppress_warning {lambda(&proc{})}.lambda?.should be_false + end end it "is preserved when passing a Proc with & to the proc keyword" do |