Move spec/rubyspec to spec/ruby for consistency

* Other ruby implementations use the spec/ruby directory.
  [Misc #13792] [ruby-core:82287]

git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@59979 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e

1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/spec/ruby/core/kernel/public_method_spec.rb b/spec/ruby/core/kernel/public_method_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..f1cc168420
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/ruby/core/kernel/public_method_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+require File.expand_path('../../../spec_helper', __FILE__)
+require File.expand_path('../fixtures/classes', __FILE__)
+require File.expand_path('../shared/method', __FILE__)
+
+describe "Kernel#public_method" do
+  it_behaves_like(:kernel_method, :public_method)
+
+  before :each do
+    @obj = KernelSpecs::A.new
+  end
+
+  it "raises a NameError when called on a private method" do
+    @obj.send(:private_method).should == :private_method
+    lambda do
+      @obj.public_method(:private_method)
+    end.should raise_error(NameError)
+  end
+
+  it "raises a NameError when called on a protected method" do
+    @obj.send(:protected_method).should == :protected_method
+    lambda {
+      @obj.public_method(:protected_method)
+    }.should raise_error(NameError)
+  end
+
+  it "raises a NameError if we only repond_to_missing? method, true" do
+    obj = KernelSpecs::RespondViaMissing.new
+    lambda do
+      obj.public_method(:handled_privately)
+    end.should raise_error(NameError)
+  end
+end