less verbose code by sharing attribute definitions

The idea behind this commit is that handles_sp and leaf are two
concepts that are not mutually independent.  By making one explicitly
depend another, we can reduces the number of lines of codes written,
thus making things concise.


git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@65426 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/insns.def b/insns.def
index 629a2f1bc9..132ce2f179 100644
--- a/insns.def
+++ b/insns.def
@@ -44,9 +44,11 @@
          `insn_stack_increase`.
 
        * handles_sp: If it is true, VM deals with sp in the insn.
+         Default is if the instruction takes ISEQ operand or not.
 
        * leaf: indicates that the instruction is "leaf" i.e. it does
-         not introduce new stack frame on top of it.  Default true.
+         not introduce new stack frame on top of it.
+         If an instruction handles sp, that can never be a leaf.
 
    - Attributes can access operands, but not stack (push/pop) variables.
 
@@ -357,7 +359,7 @@ putiseq
 (ISEQ iseq)
 ()
 (VALUE ret)
-// attr bool leaf = true; /* yes it is */
+// attr bool handles_sp = false; /* of course it doesn't */
 {
     ret = (VALUE)iseq;
 }
@@ -713,7 +715,6 @@ defineclass
 (ID id, ISEQ class_iseq, rb_num_t flags)
 (VALUE cbase, VALUE super)
 (VALUE val)
-// attr bool handles_sp = true;
 {
     VALUE klass = vm_find_or_create_class_by_id(id, flags, cbase, super);
 
@@ -740,7 +741,6 @@ send
 (CALL_INFO ci, CALL_CACHE cc, ISEQ blockiseq)
 (...)
 (VALUE val)
-// attr bool handles_sp = true;
 // attr rb_snum_t sp_inc = - (int)(ci->orig_argc + ((ci->flag & VM_CALL_ARGS_BLOCKARG) ? 1 : 0));
 {
     struct rb_calling_info calling;
@@ -757,7 +757,6 @@ opt_send_without_block
 (CALL_INFO ci, CALL_CACHE cc)
 (...)
 (VALUE val)
-// attr bool leaf = false; /* Of course it isn't. */
 // attr bool handles_sp = true;
 // attr rb_snum_t sp_inc = -ci->orig_argc;
 {
@@ -828,7 +827,6 @@ invokesuper
 (CALL_INFO ci, CALL_CACHE cc, ISEQ blockiseq)
 (...)
 (VALUE val)
-// attr bool handles_sp = true;
 // attr rb_snum_t sp_inc = - (int)(ci->orig_argc + ((ci->flag & VM_CALL_ARGS_BLOCKARG) ? 1 : 0));
 {
     struct rb_calling_info calling;
@@ -845,7 +843,6 @@ invokeblock
 (CALL_INFO ci)
 (...)
 (VALUE val)
-// attr bool leaf = false; /* Of course it isn't. */
 // attr bool handles_sp = true;
 // attr rb_snum_t sp_inc = 1 - ci->orig_argc;
 {