summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/ruby
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-12-07Prevent modification of splat array inside setup_parameters_complexJeremy Evans
For the following: ``` def f(*a); a end p f(*a, kw: 3) ``` `setup_parameters_complex` pushes `{kw: 3}` onto `a`. This worked fine back when `concatarray true` was used and `a` was already a copy. It does not work correctly with the optimization to switch to `concatarray false`. This duplicates the array on the callee side in such a case. This affects cases when passing a regular splat and a keyword splat (or literal keywords) in a method call, where the method does not accept keywords. This allocation could probably be avoided, but doing so would make `setup_parameters_complex` more complicated.
2023-12-07[PRISM] Stop catch table entries being deleted by the optimiserMatt Valentine-House
2023-12-07Support tracing of struct member accessor methodsJeremy Evans
This follows the same approach used for attr_reader/attr_writer in 2d98593bf54a37397c6e4886ccc7e3654c2eaf85, skipping the checking for tracing after the first call using the call cache, and clearing the call cache when tracing is turned on/off. Fixes [Bug #18886]
2023-12-07Support eval "return" at toplevelJeremy Evans
Since Ruby 2.4, `return` is supported at toplevel. This makes `eval "return"` also supported at toplevel. This mostly uses the same tests as direct `return` at toplevel, with a couple differences: `END {return if false}` is a SyntaxError, but `END {eval "return" if false}` is not an error since the eval is never executed. `END {return}` is a SyntaxError, but `END {eval "return"}` is a LocalJumpError. The following is a SyntaxError: ```ruby class X nil&defined?0--begin e=no_method_error(); return; 0;end end ``` However, the following is not, because the eval is never executed: ```ruby class X nil&defined?0--begin e=no_method_error(); eval "return"; 0;end end ``` Fixes [Bug #19779]
2023-12-07Fix keyword splat passing as regular argumentJeremy Evans
Since Ruby 3.0, Ruby has passed a keyword splat as a regular argument in the case of a call to a Ruby method where the method does not accept keyword arguments, if the method call does not contain an argument splat: ```ruby def self.f(obj) obj end def self.fs(*obj) obj[0] end h = {a: 1} f(**h).equal?(h) # Before: true; After: false fs(**h).equal?(h) # Before: true; After: false a = [] f(*a, **h).equal?(h) # Before and After: false fs(*a, **h).equal?(h) # Before and After: false ``` The fact that the behavior differs when passing an empty argument splat makes it obvious that something is not working the way it is intended. Ruby 2 always copied the keyword splat hash, and that is the expected behavior in Ruby 3. This bug is because of a missed check in setup_parameters_complex. If the keyword splat passed is not mutable, then it points to an existing object and not a new object, and therefore it must be copied. Now, there are 3 specs for the broken behavior of directly using the keyword splatted hash. Fix two specs and add a new version guard. Do not keep the specs for the broken behavior for earlier Ruby versions, in case this fix is backported. For the ruby2_keywords spec, just remove the related line, since that line is unrelated to what the spec is testing. Co-authored-by: Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
2023-12-07[PRISM] Don't pop arguments on a return nodeJemma Issroff
Since ReturnNodes don't get popped, their arguments shouldn't either
2023-12-07Fix GC.verify_compaction_references not moving every objectKJ Tsanaktsidis
The intention of GC.verify_compaction_references is, I believe, to force every single movable object to be moved, so that it's possible to debug native extensions which not correctly updating their references to objects they mark as movable. To do this, it doubles the number of allocated pages for each size pool, and sorts the heap pages so that the free ones are swept first; thus, every object in an old page should be moved into a free slot in one of the new pages. This worked fine until movement of objects _between_ size pools during compaction was implemented. That causes some problems for verify_compaction_references: * We were doubling the number of pages in each size pool, but actually if some objects need to move into a _different_ pool, there's no guarantee that they'll be enough room in that one. * It's possible for the sweep & compact cursors to meet in one size pool before all the objects that want to move into that size pool from another are processed by the compaction. You can see these problems by changing some of the movement tests in test_gc_compact.rb to try and move e.g. 50,000 objects instead of 500; the test is not able to actually move all of the objects in a single compaction run. To fix this, we do two things in verify_compaction_references: * Firstly, we add enough pages to every size pool to make them the same size. This ensures that their compact cursors will all have space to move during compaction (even if that means empty pages are pointlessly compacted) * Then, we examine every object and determine where it _wants_ to be compacted into. We use this information to add additional pages to each size pool to handle all objects which should live there. With these two changes, we can move arbitrary amounts of objects into the correct size pool in a single call to verify_compaction_references. My _motivation_ for performing this work was to try and fix some test stability issues in test_gc_compact.rb. I now no longer think that we actually see this particular bug in rubyci.org, but I also think verify_compaction_references should do what it says on the tin, so it's worth keeping. [Bug #20022]
2023-12-07[PRISM] Rescue should set correct end_labelMatt Valentine-House
In order for a break inside the rescue to have the correct jump target
2023-12-07Warn `it` (#9152)Takashi Kokubun
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18980
2023-12-06Copy encoding flags when copying a regex [Bug #20039]Dustin Brown
* :bug: Fixes [Bug #20039](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20039) When a Regexp is initialized with another Regexp, we simply copy the properties from the original. However, the flags on the original were not being copied correctly. This caused an issue when the original had multibyte characters and was being compared with an ASCII string. Without the forced encoding flag (`KCODE_FIXED`) transferred on to the new Regexp, the comparison would fail. See the included test for an example. Co-authored-by: Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
2023-12-07Fix SEGV caused by `GC::Profiler.raw_data` (#9122)Soutaro Matsumoto
2023-12-06[PRISM] Correct depth offset for block local varsMatt Valentine-House
Blocks should always look at their own local table first, even when defined inside an ensure/rescue or something else that uses depth offset. We can ignore the depth offset if we're doing local lookups inside a block
2023-12-06[PRISM] Fix ReturnNodesJemma Issroff
This code is almost exactly the same (fixed variable names) as what exists already in compile.c
2023-12-06Re-embed when removing Object instance variablesPeter Zhu
Objects with the same shape must always have the same "embeddedness" (either embedded or heap allocated) because YJIT assumes so. However, using remove_instance_variable, it's possible that some objects are embedded and some are heap allocated because it does not re-embed heap allocated objects. This commit changes remove_instance_variable to re-embed Object instance variables when it becomes small enough.
2023-12-06[PRISM] Account for nil parent in Call{Operator,And,Or}PathWriteNodesJemma Issroff
Prior to this commit, we were not accounting for the case of a nil parent in a CallXPathWriteNode, for example ::A ||= 1. This commit checks if the parent exists, and if not, uses Object as the inferred parent
2023-12-06[PRISM] Implement `PM_MATCH_PREDICATE_NODE` for `defined?`eileencodes
Ruby code: ```ruby defined? 1 in 1 ``` Instructions: ``` "********* Ruby *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,16)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave "********* PRISM *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,16)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave ```
2023-12-06[PRISM] Implement `PM_KEYWORD_HASH_NODE` for `defined?`eileencodes
Ruby code: ```ruby defined? [a: [:b, :c]] ``` Instructions (without optimizations): ``` "********* Ruby *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,23)> == catch table | catch type: rescue st: 0001 ed: 0007 sp: 0000 cont: 0009 | == disasm: #<ISeq:defined guard in <compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(-1,-1)> | local table (size: 1, argc: 0 [opts: 0, rest: -1, post: 0, block: -1, kw: -1@-1, kwrest: -1]) | [ 1] "$!"@0 | 0000 putnil | 0001 leave |------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0000 putnil 0001 putobject true 0003 branchunless 9 0005 putobject "expression" 0007 swap 0008 pop 0009 leave "********* PRISM *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,23)> == catch table | catch type: rescue st: 0000 ed: 0009 sp: 0000 cont: 0009 | == disasm: #<ISeq:defined guard in <compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(-1,-1)> | local table (size: 1, argc: 0 [opts: 0, rest: -1, post: 0, block: -1, kw: -1@-1, kwrest: -1]) | [ 1] "$!"@0 | 0000 putnil | 0001 leave |------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0000 putnil 0001 putobject true 0003 branchunless 9 0005 putobject "expression" 0007 swap 0008 pop 0009 leave ``` Instructions (with optimizations): ``` "********* Ruby *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,23)> == catch table | catch type: rescue st: 0001 ed: 0003 sp: 0000 cont: 0005 | == disasm: #<ISeq:defined guard in <compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(-1,-1)> | local table (size: 1, argc: 0 [opts: 0, rest: -1, post: 0, block: -1, kw: -1@-1, kwrest: -1]) | [ 1] "$!"@0 | 0000 putnil | 0001 leave |------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0000 putnil 0001 putobject "expression" 0003 swap 0004 pop 0005 leave "********* PRISM *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,23)> == catch table | catch type: rescue st: 0000 ed: 0005 sp: 0000 cont: 0005 | == disasm: #<ISeq:defined guard in <compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(-1,-1)> | local table (size: 1, argc: 0 [opts: 0, rest: -1, post: 0, block: -1, kw: -1@-1, kwrest: -1]) | [ 1] "$!"@0 | 0000 putnil | 0001 leave |------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0000 putnil 0001 putobject "expression" 0003 swap 0004 pop 0005 leave ```
2023-12-06[PRISM] Implement `PM_SPLAT_NODE` for `defined?`eileencodes
In an array for `defined?` we need to check if there is a `contains_splat` flag, if so bail early. Ruby code: ```ruby defined?([[*1..2], 3, *4..5]) ``` Instructions: ``` "********* Ruby *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,29)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave "********* PRISM *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,29)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave ```
2023-12-06[PRISM] Implement `PM_SOURCE_LINE_NODE` for `defined?`eileencodes
Ruby code: ```ruby defined?(__LINE__) ``` Instructions: ``` "********* Ruby *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,18)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave "********* PRISM *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,18)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave ```
2023-12-06[PRISM] Implement `PM_SOURCE_FILE_NODE` for `defined?`eileencodes
Ruby code: ```ruby defined?(__FILE__) ``` Instructions: ``` "********* Ruby *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,18)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave "********* PRISM *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,18)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave ```
2023-12-06[PRISM] Implement `PM_SOURCE_ENCODING_NODE` for `defined?eileencodes
Ruby code: ```ruby defined?(__ENCODING__) ``` Instructions: ``` "********* Ruby *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,22)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave "********* PRISM *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,22)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave ```
2023-12-06[PRISM] Implement `PM_IMAGINARY_NODE` for `defined?`eileencodes
Ruby Code: ``` defined?(1i) ``` Instructions: ``` "********* Ruby *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,12)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave "********* PRISM *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,12)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave ```
2023-12-06[PRISM] Compile Rescue Modifier nodesMatt Valentine-House
2023-12-05[PRISM] Implement Retry node.Matt Valentine-House
2023-12-04[PRISM] Fixed redo nodeJemma Issroff
2023-12-04[PRISM] Handle percent literals for `defined?`eileencodes
Tests all the possible percent literal with `defined?`. Implements the missing `PM_X_STRING_NODE` for the `%x` literal. Code: ```ruby defined?(%x[1,2,3]) ``` ``` "********* Ruby *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,19)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave "********* PRISM *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,19)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave ```
2023-12-04[PRISM] Implement `PM_INTERPOLATED_REGULAR_EXPRESSION_NODE`eileencodes
Implements `PM_INTERPOLATED_REGULAR_EXPRESSION_NODE` for `defined?` Code: ```ruby defined?(/#{1}/) ``` ``` "********* Ruby *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,16)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave "********* PRISM *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,16)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave ```
2023-12-04[PRISM] Implement `PM_INTERPOLATED_STRING_NODE`eileencodes
Implements `PM_INTERPOLATED_STRING_NODE` for `defined?` Code: ```ruby defined?("#{expr}") ``` ``` "********* Ruby *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,19)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave "********* PRISM *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,19)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave ```
2023-12-04[PRISM] Fix `PM_PARENTHESES_NODE`eileencodes
In #9101 I only accounted for an empty paren. This change implements the `PM_PARENTHESES_NODE` for when it's `nil` and when it's an expression. Code: ```ruby defined?(("a")) ``` ``` "********* Ruby *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,15)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave "********* PRISM *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,15)> 0000 putobject "expression" 0002 leave ```
2023-12-04[Prism] Implement backref and numbered reference for `defined?`eileencodes
This PR implements `PM_BACK_REFERENCE_READ_NODE` and `PM_NUMBERED_REFERENCE_READ_NODE` for `defined?`. The following now works: * `PM_NUMBERED_REFERENCE_READ_NODE` ``` defined? $1 defined? $2 ``` Instructions: ``` "********* RUBY *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,12)> 0000 putnil 0001 defined ref, :$1, "global-variable" 0005 leave "********* PRISM *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,12)> 0000 putnil 0001 defined ref, :$1, "global-variable" 0005 leave ``` * `PM_BACK_REFERENCE_READ_NODE` ``` defined? $' defined? $` defined? $& ``` Instructions: ``` "********* RUBY *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,12)> 0000 putnil 0001 defined ref, :$`, "global-variable" 0005 leave "********* PRISM *************" == disasm: #<ISeq:<compiled>@<compiled>:0 (0,0)-(0,12)> 0000 putnil 0001 defined ref, :$`, "global-variable" 0005 leave ```
2023-12-04[PRISM] Fix compilation for NextNodeJemma Issroff
This code was almost enitrely the same as the existing compiler's code for its NextNode.
2023-12-01Implement paren node for `defined?`eileencodes
Implements and adds a test for passing a parentheses node to `defined?`.
2023-12-01Implements missing literals for `defined?`eileencodes
This PR implements the following literals: - String - Symbols - Integers - Floats - Regexs - Ranges - Lambdas - Hashes and tests for them.
2023-12-01Make String#undump compaction safePeter Zhu
2023-12-02[Bug #20033] Dynamic regexp should not assign capturesNobuyoshi Nakada
2023-12-01[PRISM] Account for RescueNodes with no statementsJemma Issroff
We need a PUTNIL if a RescueNode has no statements.
2023-12-01[PRISM] Fix behavior of BlockParameters with only one parameterJemma Issroff
This commit sets the ambiguous param flag if there is only one parameter on a block node. It also fixes a small bug with a trailing comma on params.
2023-12-01[PRISM] Restructure parametersJemma Issroff
Prior to this commit, we weren't accounting for hidden variables on the locals table, so we would have inconsistencies on the stack. This commit fixes params, and introduces a hidden_variable_count on the scope, both of which fix parameters.
2023-12-01[PRISM] Compile RescueNodeMatt Valentine-House
2023-12-01[Bug #20030] dispatch invalid escaped character without ignoring itNobuyoshi Nakada
2023-11-30YJIT: Cancel on-stack jit_return on invalidation (#9086)Takashi Kokubun
* YJIT: Cancel on-stack jit_return on invalidation Co-authored-by: Alan Wu <alansi.xingwu@shopify.com> * Use RUBY_VM_CONTROL_FRAME_STACK_OVERFLOW_P --------- Co-authored-by: Alan Wu <alansi.xingwu@shopify.com>
2023-11-30YJIT: Use `stats[:live_page_count]`, renamed from :compiled_page_countAlan Wu
Co-authored-by: Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@gmail.com>
2023-11-30[Prism] Fix local variable access for POST_EXECUTION_NODEMatt Valentine-House
2023-11-30Store depth offset inside the scope node.Matt Valentine-House
Instead of incrementing the depth using call by reference as we're recursing up the stack we could instead store an offset for each known scope where we know the depth is going to represented differently in the Prism ast.
2023-11-30Add a rescue for `defined?(A::B::C)`Aaron Patterson
It's possible for `defined?(A::B::C)` to raise an exception. `defined?` must swallow the exception and return nil, so this commit adds a rescue entry for `defined?` expressions on constant paths
2023-11-30[Bug #19877] Assign captures for direct regexp literal onlyNobuyoshi Nakada
2023-11-30Add some test cases to Data testOKURA Masafumi
I noticed that `deconstruct` and `hash` don't have enough coverage. The behavior of `hash` is documented so I copied it.
2023-11-29Guard match from GC in String#gsubPeter Zhu
We need to guard match from GC because otherwise it could end up being reclaimed or moved in compaction.
2023-11-29[PRISM] Implement CallNodes with splat followed by argsJemma Issroff
2023-11-29[PRISM] Account for ImplicitRestNodeJemma Issroff
Prism introduced a new ImplicitRestNode. This adds tests for the ImplicitRestNode cases, and changes one assert which is no longer accurate.