| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
These specs doesn't really need an installed bundle, they only need a
`Gemfile`.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/06c85683ae
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/ade0c441d5
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
We have a check on an `at_exit` hook that checks that system bundler is
never loaded instead of our development copy. The check was failing in
these cases, but in a silent way because the errors were being swallowed.
This commit changes these specs to make sure they load the right
bundler.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/cd1c1bc297
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
On bundler 3, the `--deployment` flag doesn't exist, so the `bundle
install --deployment` command was failing silently and the spec was
verifying a different scenario.
Change the spec to work the same regardless of bundler's major version.
Also, from the spec description it was not apparently that a specific
case involving deployment mode was being tested, so I reworded it to
make it more apparent.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/3e33e2b927
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
On bundler 3, where the default install path is `.bundle`, these specs
were trying to change permissions of the
`.bundle/ruby/<ruby_abi_version>` folder, which didn't exist yet,so the
permission changing command was failing and the spec was not testing the
right thing.
Change the specs so that the permissions are correctly changed, by first
configuring the local path to be `.bundle` (which creates the `.bundle`
folder), and then changing permissions of the `.bundle` folder
explicitly, which exists already.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/2833162fb0
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
Bundler 3 installs by default to `.bundle`. That means that, because the
`bar` gem was not previously available at this location but as a system
gem, the initial `bundle install` was silently failing. As a
consequence, the spec was not testing the exact scenario it meant to
test.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/202399521c
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
This spec is specifically testing for the case where there's no
`Gemfile.lock` file and it's only doing the expected thing because the
`bundle install` command is silently failing. Remove the `bundle
install` to reduce confusion.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/ec39fbde0e
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
They don't need to run that many commands, and the new version is also
more readable in my opinion.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/efff3e3210
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
They are preceded by `install_gemfile` calls, which mean `bundle
install` is being run twice for no reason.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/d2b2d10862
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
This command is failing because of the same reason that the subsequent
`bundle exec` is failing: the gemspec is invalid. The `bundle install`
here deviates the `bundle exec` focus from the test and is unnecessary:
all we need is a `Gemfile` that will trigger the `bundle exec`, so let's
create and avoid the extra command.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/eb83cf6cf1
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
This command was silently failing but doesn't really affect the outcome
of the spec.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/7880d08146
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
It turns out that this test is checking essentially nothing useful. The
paperclip gem doesn't exist in our setup, so initial install is failing
and the test is only checking that calling `bundle check` 3 times on a
broken setup always returns the same thing.
I went to the history of this test:
* https://github.com/rubygems/bundler/commit/105654a31e07e9b0a198f1a5a5ec94e365854edf
* https://github.com/rubygems/bundler/commit/ae53be1f8748bfc41bc6565dc4922a1c0ac80998
* https://github.com/rubygems/bundler/commit/d19f4a7b32ccf4ec4ecda5c7c0354adc81e1efb6
* https://github.com/rubygems/bundler/commit/092f169d01472336598e29b32550399991940d63
* https://github.com/rubygems/bundler/commit/36878435b5f0be75fc6f2e07cebd7f15aaddadf0
And have finally decided to remove it since I'm not sure changing it to
something else will lead to testing something useful and not already
tested.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/6184322967
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
This spec was broken. The second `bundle install` was silently failing.
This means that the spec was actually checking an scenario completely
different from the one that was supposed to be tested. And also a very
dummy one: that running `bundle cache` twice doesn't cache a completely
unrelated gem.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/f11a5d2df9
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
The inner specs have separated specs for the `< 3` and `= 2` cases, so
this outer tag is incorrect.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/61e905ca27
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
The commands these specs run were throwing warnings in bundler 2, and
failing on bundler 3, effectively testing a different scenario to what
they were supposed to.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/97ac1ced49
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
The `rails_fail` name is misleading because there's no specific reason
why such a gem would need to fail. As a matter of fact, `bundle
install`'ing a Genfile with only that dependency like the spec the
previous commit adds is not expected to fail.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/b947f40701
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
The `only_update_to_newer_versions` feature flag will enable some new
behaviour in bundler 3 (or maybe earlier if we decide to consider it a
bug fix) that prevents `bundle update` from unexpectedly downgrading
direct dependencies.
This seems reasonable, but the current implementation is adding
additional requirements for all locked dependencies, not only from the
ones in the `Gemfile`. That causes some situations where the `Gemfile`
is edited and will resolve to older versions to start failing.
This commit fixes the problem by making sure extra requirements are
added exclusively for direct dependencies in the `Gemfile`, not for all
direct dependencies in the lock file.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/128b4596e1
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3212
|
|
I'm guessing the commands under ruby-core setup are very long, so the
title gets truncated. Use a shorter title, since the test doesn't really
care.
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3225
|
|
The `gem_command` helper was failing to require `support/hax.rb`, which
takes care of making sure rubygems actually picks up the right `ruby`
executable under ruby-core setup (`ENV["RUBY"]`). This caused binstubs
to be generated with a wrong shebang, and that caused `bundle exec` to
not work. The error message was pretty confusing though due to
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16952.
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3225
|
|
|
|
|
|
The warning for these was added in 2.7.
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3208
|
|
Fixes [Bug #16173]
Co-Authored-By: Burdette Lamar <burdettelamar@yahoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Jeremy Evans <code@jeremyevans.net>
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3206
|
|
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3135
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/3666/commits/ca5bf584026c9fd3a288eb10c65493e9f01ccc44
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
I had to pin `redis-namespace` in our spec to 1.6.0 because on ruby
2.3.0 the spec no longer resolved to that version, so the cached `.gem`
file was missing there.
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
Previously it was failing and not recording. Also, the
`BUNDLER_SPEC_FORCE_RECORD` environment variable was forcing every
request to be recorded, including duplicated requests to the same
endpoint. That meant the recorded `versions` file would be incorrect
because it would contain the result of the last request, which would be
`304 NOT MODIFIED`.
So, to rerecord, delete cassettes and let them be recorded when needed.
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/8dca0ad56e
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
deleted, unlike `bundle show`
Co-Authored-By: David Rodríguez <deivid.rodriguez@riseup.net>
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/2851b40ffb
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/1db61b5b5e
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/1d2292a88f
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
* bundle gem previously ignored gem.test when passed empty -t flag,
defaulting to RSpec
* bundle gem will now ask user for test framework when passed empty -t
flag and gem.test is set to false, but will not overwrite gem.test
* thor option parsing for String types falls back to human name for nil,
so setting lazy_default to nil won't work
* https://github.com/erikhuda/thor/blob/c5161501e0cfac7a8c5b838a9c6084c275f03c0d/lib/thor/parser/options.rb#L224
Default to Bundler.settings["gem.test"] for empty --test
Add shared examples for test framework to newgem spec
Add examples for empty --test flag to newgem spec
Simplify conditional for prompting test framework
Follow naming conventions for bundler settings
Add more descriptive test framework help text for bundle gem
Update man pages for bundler
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/ab0785a09f
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
Instead, use the non-deprecated option except when specifically testing
deprecated CLI flags. In that case, pass the flag directly and limit
the specs to `bundler < 3`.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/3d5e186241
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/f878a81f22
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
Some of them were passing "by chance" because they used a `bundle
install` command that failed, but the assertion was using the result of
the previous. Others were skipped on bundler 3. Now they all pass in all
versions.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/cedf611e11
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
options
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/4d39338670
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
By making them more explicit.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/9979c5a811
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
Even if no explicit flags were passed to it.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/0598cbb68c
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/731b3783f1
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/6395392b83
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/3372b21553
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
This spec was originally written many years ago to verity gems were
properly "remembered" in the lock file. At this point, the test feels a
bit dummy since the first `bundle install` already runs on a "clean
machine".
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/dbfefb3f5a
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
This reverts commit 20f06d9e178211a3016133852b72d21ac7bb93ad, reversing
changes made to f2b30cb70df8a518bef0e8a64bbceb86234d922d.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/40802bdb18
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
When bundler specs are run from a ruby tarball (ruby-core does this),
there's no git folder, so `git ls-files` fails.
Support this case by making specs rely on the list of files from the
bundler gemspec instead, and invert the spec that makes sure we ship the
right set of files.
As per the other quality specs, skip them in this case.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/b28d5ec931
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/1cc02930f3
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
This reverts commit 67d2a715ca35090fbb3ab13df5b7348b1807dd47.
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
with build metadata"
This reverts commit fcc8be0198a16cc5fa7d4827be0c781209b70f98.
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
And never recommend it inside CLI messages.
This flag represents the default behaviour of `bundle install`, and the
only reason it exists is to "override" previous `--deployment` flag
usages which were silently remembered. So it should be deprecated just
like all the other flags the rely on remembering their values across
invocations.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/40e50b7190
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
This spec is run only in bundler 2 mode, and it's testing the
`--deployment` flag specifically.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/a5d91c68b6
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|
|
They seem to be passing?
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/a00d1e6896
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3184
|