| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
(https://github.com/ruby/irb/pull/478)
Given that `show_doc` already supports syntax like `String#gsub`, it
should be able to take it in non-string form too, like `edit` and
`show_source` do. This ensures users can have a consistent syntax on
argument between different commands.
|
|
descriptions
(https://github.com/ruby/irb/pull/463)
https://github.com/ruby/irb/commit/7e857655ac
|
|
* Add edit command
* Make find_source a public singleton method
* Add document for the edit command
* Make find_end private
* Remove duplicated private
https://github.com/ruby/irb/commit/4321674aa7
Co-authored-by: Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@gmail.com>
|
|
(https://github.com/ruby/irb/pull/430)
* Support non-string input in show_source
* Test show_source as a method
|
|
* Use colorable: argument as the only coloring control
* Centalize color controling logic at Color.colorable?
There are 2 requirements for coloring output:
1. It's supported on the platform
2. The user wants it: `IRB.conf[:USE_COLORIZE] == true`
Right now we check 1 and 2 separately whenever we colorize things.
But it's error-prone because while 1 is the default of `colorable`
parameter, 2 always need to manually checked. When 2 is overlooked, it
causes issues like https://github.com/ruby/irb/pull/362
And there's 0 case where we may want to colorize even when the user
disables it. So I think we should merge 2 into `Color.colorable?` so it
can be automatically picked up.
* Add tests for all inspect modes
* Simplify inspectors' coloring logic
* Replace use_colorize? with Color.colorable?
* Remove Context#use_colorize cause it's redundant
https://github.com/ruby/irb/commit/1c53023ac4
|
|
(https://github.com/ruby/irb/pull/362)
https://github.com/ruby/irb/commit/534688dfc4
|
|
If this is at the top level, it stops the documentation of the
entire module, but not only the part in this file.
https://github.com/ruby/irb/commit/86c41b06ad
|
|
Instead of accessing the struct as an array, access it via methods. There are other places inside of this file already using this API (for example https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/e0a5c3d2b71dfad038d7562fdd33f02ffd79232d/lib/irb/ruby-lex.rb#L829-L830).
This commit moves all struct array-ish calls to use their method calls instead. It is also ~1.23 faster accessing values via a method instead of as an array according to this microbenchmark:
```ruby
Elem = Struct.new(:pos, :event, :tok, :state, :message) do
def initialize(pos, event, tok, state, message = nil)
super(pos, event, tok, State.new(state), message)
end
# ...
def to_a
a = super
a.pop unless a.empty?
a
end
end
class ElemClass
attr_accessor :pos, :event, :tok, :state, :message
def initialize(pos, event, tok, state, message = nil)
@pos = pos
@event = event
@tok = tok
@state = State.new(state)
@message = message
end
def to_a
if @message
[@pos, @event, @tok, @state, @message]
else
[@pos, @event, @tok, @state]
end
end
end
# stub state class creation for now
class State; def initialize(val); end; end
```
```ruby
Benchmark.ips do |x|
x.report("struct") { struct[1] }
x.report("class ") { from_class.event }
x.compare!
end; nil
```
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
struct 1.624M i/100ms
class 1.958M i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
struct 17.139M (± 2.6%) i/s - 86.077M in 5.025801s
class 21.104M (± 3.4%) i/s - 105.709M in 5.015193s
Comparison:
class : 21103826.3 i/s
struct: 17139201.5 i/s - 1.23x (± 0.00) slower
```
Notes:
Merged: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/5093
|
|
This reverts commit 27dd2867cda5c789efaa5078214ad2fd82adcebf.
This is to fix the test I added.
(I separated commits to test a new behavior of ruby-commit-hook)
https://github.com/ruby/irb/commit/fe055d521a
|
|
https://github.com/ruby/irb/pull/249 actually slowed down how `code` is
concatenated. The original way of creating `code` is faster.
[before]
user system total real
2.420137 0.005364 2.425501 ( 2.426264)
[after]
user system total real
1.000221 0.007454 1.007675 ( 1.008295)
Theoretically, this implementation might skip lines that don't appear in
Ripper tokens, but this assumes such lines don't impact whether the code
passes compilation or not. At least normal blank lines seem to have an
`on_ignored_nl` token anyway though.
https://github.com/ruby/irb/commit/27dd2867cd
|
|
https://github.com/ruby/irb/commit/2b79e9ad21
|
|
https://github.com/ruby/irb/commit/108cb04352
|
