summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/proc.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authornagachika <nagachika@b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e>2017-03-27 17:38:08 +0000
committernagachika <nagachika@b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e>2017-03-27 17:38:08 +0000
commit2334147eab7273d00b97b339da1800f103bca0e9 (patch)
tree06e001d12f6ce69f7a2d3574c32dc878fc6ab224 /proc.c
parente88d0b324bc718d18a09e5f9bbe216d17d4b1ec3 (diff)
merge revision(s) 57765: [Backport #13273]
proc.c: documentation for Proc#{call,yield,[]} * proc.c: [DOC] fix and improve docs for Proc#{call,yield,[]}: * change order of Document-method directives as workaround for an RDoc rendering problem where the documentation for Proc#call displays a "Document-method: []" code block. [ruby-core:79887] [Bug #13273] * add missing call-seq and example for Proc#yield * remove pointless cross reference to Proc#yield * update description for handling of extra or missing arguments, improve examples and add cross reference to #lambda? git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/branches/ruby_2_3@58185 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
Diffstat (limited to 'proc.c')
-rw-r--r--proc.c41
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/proc.c b/proc.c
index 987137988d..87e3cd1a5a 100644
--- a/proc.c
+++ b/proc.c
@@ -732,45 +732,42 @@ rb_block_lambda(void)
/* CHECKME: are the argument checking semantics correct? */
/*
- * Document-method: call
* Document-method: []
+ * Document-method: call
* Document-method: yield
*
* call-seq:
* prc.call(params,...) -> obj
* prc[params,...] -> obj
* prc.(params,...) -> obj
+ * prc.yield(params,...) -> obj
*
* Invokes the block, setting the block's parameters to the values in
* <i>params</i> using something close to method calling semantics.
- * Generates a warning if multiple values are passed to a proc that
- * expects just one (previously this silently converted the parameters
- * to an array). Note that <code>prc.()</code> invokes
- * <code>prc.call()</code> with the parameters given. It's a syntax sugar to
- * hide "call".
+ * Returns the value of the last expression evaluated in the block.
*
- * Returns the value of the last expression evaluated in the block. See
- * also Proc#yield.
+ * a_proc = Proc.new {|scalar, *values| values.map {|value| value*scalar } }
+ * a_proc.call(9, 1, 2, 3) #=> [9, 18, 27]
+ * a_proc[9, 1, 2, 3] #=> [9, 18, 27]
+ * a_proc.(9, 1, 2, 3) #=> [9, 18, 27]
+ * a_proc.yield(9, 1, 2, 3) #=> [9, 18, 27]
*
- * a_proc = Proc.new { |scalar, *values| values.collect { |value| value*scalar } }
- * a_proc.call(9, 1, 2, 3) #=> [9, 18, 27]
- * a_proc[9, 1, 2, 3] #=> [9, 18, 27]
- * a_proc.(9, 1, 2, 3) #=> [9, 18, 27]
+ * Note that <code>prc.()</code> invokes <code>prc.call()</code> with
+ * the parameters given. It's syntactic sugar to hide "call".
*
* For procs created using <code>lambda</code> or <code>->()</code> an error
- * is generated if the wrong number of parameters are passed to a Proc with
- * multiple parameters. For procs created using <code>Proc.new</code> or
- * <code>Kernel.proc</code>, extra parameters are silently discarded.
+ * is generated if the wrong number of parameters are passed to the proc.
+ * For procs created using <code>Proc.new</code> or <code>Kernel.proc</code>,
+ * extra parameters are silently discarded and missing parameters are
+ * set to +nil+.
*
- * a_proc = lambda {|a,b| a}
- * a_proc.call(1,2,3)
- *
- * <em>produces:</em>
+ * a_proc = proc {|a,b| [a,b] }
+ * a_proc.call(1) #=> [1, nil]
*
- * prog.rb:4:in `block in <main>': wrong number of arguments (given 3, expected 2) (ArgumentError)
- * from prog.rb:5:in `call'
- * from prog.rb:5:in `<main>'
+ * a_proc = lambda {|a,b| [a,b] }
+ * a_proc.call(1) # ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 1, expected 2)
*
+ * See also Proc#lambda?.
*/
#if 0
static VALUE