require File.expand_path('../../../spec_helper', __FILE__) require File.expand_path('../fixtures/classes', __FILE__) EvalSpecs::A.new.c describe "Kernel#eval" do it "is a private method" do Kernel.should have_private_instance_method(:eval) end it "is a module function" do Kernel.respond_to?(:eval).should == true end it "evaluates the code within" do eval("2 + 3").should == 5 end it "coerces an object to string" do eval(EvalSpecs::CoercedObject.new).should == 5 end it "evaluates within the scope of the eval" do EvalSpecs::A::B.name.should == "EvalSpecs::A::B" end it "evaluates such that consts are scoped to the class of the eval" do EvalSpecs::A::C.name.should == "EvalSpecs::A::C" end it "finds a local in an enclosing scope" do a = 1 eval("a").should == 1 end it "updates a local in an enclosing scope" do a = 1 eval("a = 2") a.should == 2 end it "updates a local in a surrounding block scope" do EvalSpecs.new.f do a = 1 eval("a = 2") a.should == 2 end end it "updates a local in a scope above a surrounding block scope" do a = 1 EvalSpecs.new.f do eval("a = 2") a.should == 2 end a.should == 2 end it "updates a local in a scope above when modified in a nested block scope" do a = 1 es = EvalSpecs.new eval("es.f { es.f { a = 2 } }") a.should == 2 end it "finds locals in a nested eval" do eval('test = 10; eval("test")').should == 10 end it "does not share locals across eval scopes" do code = fixture __FILE__, "eval_locals.rb" ruby_exe(code).chomp.should == "NameError" end it "doesn't accept a Proc object as a binding" do x = 1 bind = proc {} lambda { eval("x", bind) }.should raise_error(TypeError) end it "does not make Proc locals visible to evaluated code" do bind = proc { inner = 4 } lambda { eval("inner", bind.binding) }.should raise_error(NameError) end # REWRITE ME: This obscures the real behavior of where locals are stored # in eval bindings. it "allows a binding to be captured inside an eval" do outer_binding = binding level1 = eval("binding", outer_binding) level2 = eval("binding", level1) eval("x = 2", outer_binding) eval("y = 3", level1) eval("w=1", outer_binding) eval("w", outer_binding).should == 1 eval("w=1", level1).should == 1 eval("w", level1).should == 1 eval("w=1", level2).should == 1 eval("w", level2).should == 1 eval("x", outer_binding).should == 2 eval("x=2", level1) eval("x", level1).should == 2 eval("x=2", level2) eval("x", level2).should == 2 eval("y=3", outer_binding) eval("y", outer_binding).should == 3 eval("y=3", level1) eval("y", level1).should == 3 eval("y=3", level2) eval("y", level2).should == 3 end it "uses the same scope for local variables when given the same binding" do outer_binding = binding eval("if false; a = 1; end", outer_binding) eval("a", outer_binding).should be_nil end it "allows creating a new class in a binding" do bind = proc {} eval("class EvalBindingProcA; end; EvalBindingProcA.name", bind.binding).should =~ /EvalBindingProcA$/ end it "allows creating a new class in a binding created by #eval" do bind = eval "binding" eval("class EvalBindingA; end; EvalBindingA.name", bind).should =~ /EvalBindingA$/ end it "includes file and line information in syntax error" do expected = 'speccing.rb' lambda { eval('if true',TOPLEVEL_BINDING, expected) }.should raise_error(SyntaxError) { |e| e.message.should =~ /#{expected}:1:.+/ } end it "evaluates string with given filename and negative linenumber" do expected_file = 'speccing.rb' lambda { eval('if true',TOPLEVEL_BINDING, expected_file, -100) }.should raise_error(SyntaxError) { |e| e.message.should =~ /#{expected_file}:-100:.+/ } end it "sets constants at the toplevel from inside a block" do # The class Object bit is needed to workaround some mspec oddness class Object [1].each { eval "Const = 1"} Const.should == 1 remove_const :Const end end it "uses the filename of the binding if none is provided" do eval("__FILE__").should == "(eval)" eval("__FILE__", binding).should == __FILE__ eval("__FILE__", binding, "success").should == "success" eval("eval '__FILE__', binding").should == "(eval)" eval("eval '__FILE__', binding", binding).should == __FILE__ eval("eval '__FILE__', binding", binding, 'success').should == 'success' end # Found via Rubinius bug github:#149 it "does not alter the value of __FILE__ in the binding" do first_time = EvalSpecs.call_eval second_time = EvalSpecs.call_eval # This bug is seen by calling the method twice and comparing the values # of __FILE__ each time. If the bug is present, calling eval will set the # value of __FILE__ to the eval's "filename" argument. second_time.should_not == "(eval)" first_time.should == second_time end it "can be aliased" do alias aliased_eval eval x = 2 aliased_eval('x += 40') x.should == 42 end # See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-5163 it "uses the receiver as self inside the eval" do eval("self").should equal(self) Kernel.eval("self").should equal(Kernel) end it "does not pass the block to the method being eval'ed" do lambda { eval('KernelSpecs::EvalTest.call_yield') { "content" } }.should raise_error(LocalJumpError) end it "returns from the scope calling #eval when evaluating 'return'" do lambda { eval("return :eval") }.call.should == :eval end it "unwinds through a Proc-style closure and returns from a lambda-style closure in the closure chain" do code = fixture __FILE__, "eval_return_with_lambda.rb" ruby_exe(code).chomp.should == "a,b,c,eval,f" end it "raises a LocalJumpError if there is no lambda-style closure in the chain" do code = fixture __FILE__, "eval_return_without_lambda.rb" ruby_exe(code).chomp.should == "a,b,c,e,LocalJumpError,f" end end