From 660c0716595a8fc942d12317a5c55c038b830e94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Urabe, Shyouhei" Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 17:10:08 +0900 Subject: [ci skip] grammers in comments --- tool/ruby_vm/views/_copyright.erb | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'tool/ruby_vm') diff --git a/tool/ruby_vm/views/_copyright.erb b/tool/ruby_vm/views/_copyright.erb index d1d445724f..2154146f0d 100644 --- a/tool/ruby_vm/views/_copyright.erb +++ b/tool/ruby_vm/views/_copyright.erb @@ -9,23 +9,23 @@ %; %# Below is the licensing term for the generated output, not this erb file. /* This is an auto-generated file and is a part of the programming language - * Ruby. The person who created a program to generate this file (``I'' + * Ruby. The person who created a program to generate this file (``I'' * hereafter) would like to refrain from defining licensing of this generated * source code. * - * This file consist of many small parts of codes copyrighted by each authors, + * This file consists of many small parts of codes copyrighted by each author, * not only the ``I'' person. Those original authors agree with some * open-source license. I believe that the license we agree is the condition * mentioned in the file COPYING. It states "4. You may modify and include * the part of the software into any other software ...". But the problem is, * the license never makes it clear if such modified parts still remain in the * same license, or not. The fact that we agree with the source code's - * licensing terms do not automatically define that of generated ones. This is - * the reason why this file is under unclear situation. All that I know is - * that above provision guarantees this file to exist. + * licensing terms does not automatically define that of generated ones. This + * is the reason why this file is under an unclear situation. All what I know + * is that above provision guarantees this file to exist. * - * Please let me hesitate to declare something about this nuanced contract. I + * Please let me hesitate to declare something about this nuanced contract. I * am not in the position to take over other authors' license to merge into my - * one. Changing them to (say) GPLv3 is not doable by myself. Perhaps someday - * it might turn out to be okay to say this file is under a license. I wish the - * situation would become more clear in the future. */ + * one. Changing them to (say) GPLv3 is not doable by myself. Perhaps someday + * it might turn out to be okay to say this file is under a license. I wish + * the situation would become more clear in the future. */ -- cgit v1.2.3