From ef697388becedf36966a2edcdcf88baca342b9e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremy Evans <code@jeremyevans.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 07:56:28 -0700
Subject: Treat return in block in class/module as LocalJumpError (#2511)

return directly in class/module is an error, so return in
proc in class/module should also be an error.  I believe the
previous behavior was an unintentional oversight during the
addition of top-level return in 2.4.
---
 test/ruby/test_syntax.rb | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

(limited to 'test')

diff --git a/test/ruby/test_syntax.rb b/test/ruby/test_syntax.rb
index a64d25845a..80bff868f6 100644
--- a/test/ruby/test_syntax.rb
+++ b/test/ruby/test_syntax.rb
@@ -1272,6 +1272,10 @@ eom
     assert_warn(/argument of top-level return is ignored/) {eval("return 1")}
   end
 
+  def test_return_in_proc_in_class
+    assert_in_out_err(['-e', 'class TestSyntax; proc{ return }.call; end'], "", [], /^-e:1:.*unexpected return \(LocalJumpError\)/)
+  end
+
   def test_syntax_error_in_rescue
     bug12613 = '[ruby-core:76531] [Bug #12613]'
     assert_syntax_error("#{<<-"begin;"}\n#{<<-"end;"}", /Invalid retry/, bug12613)
-- 
cgit v1.2.3