From ceb9d516c6d17b0619cf53dfba7cb7b29fe073e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Evans Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:23:46 -0700 Subject: [ruby/bigdecimal] Undef BigDecimal#initialize_copy Both BigDecimal#clone and BigDecimal#dup return self, there is no reason to have initialize_copy exposed as a Ruby method. The same is true for initialize_clone and initialize_dup. https://github.com/ruby/bigdecimal/commit/aaf237fa9e --- test/bigdecimal/test_bigdecimal.rb | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) (limited to 'test/bigdecimal') diff --git a/test/bigdecimal/test_bigdecimal.rb b/test/bigdecimal/test_bigdecimal.rb index 4598936b9a..6928834907 100644 --- a/test/bigdecimal/test_bigdecimal.rb +++ b/test/bigdecimal/test_bigdecimal.rb @@ -1876,6 +1876,12 @@ class TestBigDecimal < Test::Unit::TestCase EOS end + def test_no_initialize_copy + assert_equal(false, BigDecimal(1).respond_to?(:initialize_copy, true)) + assert_equal(false, BigDecimal(1).respond_to?(:initialize_dup, true)) + assert_equal(false, BigDecimal(1).respond_to?(:initialize_clone, true)) + end + def assert_no_memory_leak(code, *rest, **opt) code = "8.times {20_000.times {begin #{code}; rescue NoMemoryError; end}; GC.start}" super(["-rbigdecimal"], -- cgit v1.2.3