summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/rake/test_rake_rules.rb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'test/rake/test_rake_rules.rb')
-rw-r--r--test/rake/test_rake_rules.rb388
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 388 deletions
diff --git a/test/rake/test_rake_rules.rb b/test/rake/test_rake_rules.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index ece75e5d9ea..00000000000
--- a/test/rake/test_rake_rules.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,388 +0,0 @@
-require File.expand_path('../helper', __FILE__)
-require 'fileutils'
-
-class TestRakeRules < Rake::TestCase
- include Rake
-
- SRCFILE = "abc.c"
- SRCFILE2 = "xyz.c"
- FTNFILE = "abc.f"
- OBJFILE = "abc.o"
- FOOFILE = "foo"
- DOTFOOFILE = ".foo"
-
- def setup
- super
-
- Task.clear
- @runs = []
- end
-
- def test_multiple_rules1
- create_file(FTNFILE)
- delete_file(SRCFILE)
- delete_file(OBJFILE)
- rule(/\.o$/ => ['.c']) do @runs << :C end
- rule(/\.o$/ => ['.f']) do @runs << :F end
- t = Task[OBJFILE]
- t.invoke
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [:F], @runs
- end
-
- def test_multiple_rules2
- create_file(FTNFILE)
- delete_file(SRCFILE)
- delete_file(OBJFILE)
- rule(/\.o$/ => ['.f']) do @runs << :F end
- rule(/\.o$/ => ['.c']) do @runs << :C end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [:F], @runs
- end
-
- def test_create_with_source
- create_file(SRCFILE)
- rule(/\.o$/ => ['.c']) do |t|
- @runs << t.name
- assert_equal OBJFILE, t.name
- assert_equal SRCFILE, t.source
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [OBJFILE], @runs
- end
-
- def test_single_dependent
- create_file(SRCFILE)
- rule(/\.o$/ => '.c') do |t|
- @runs << t.name
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [OBJFILE], @runs
- end
-
- def test_rule_can_be_created_by_string
- create_file(SRCFILE)
- rule '.o' => ['.c'] do |t|
- @runs << t.name
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [OBJFILE], @runs
- end
-
- def test_rule_prereqs_can_be_created_by_string
- create_file(SRCFILE)
- rule '.o' => '.c' do |t|
- @runs << t.name
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [OBJFILE], @runs
- end
-
- def test_plain_strings_as_dependents_refer_to_files
- create_file(SRCFILE)
- rule '.o' => SRCFILE do |t|
- @runs << t.name
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [OBJFILE], @runs
- end
-
- def test_file_names_beginning_with_dot_can_be_tricked_into_referring_to_file
- verbose(false) do
- create_file('.foo')
- rule '.o' => "./.foo" do |t|
- @runs << t.name
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [OBJFILE], @runs
- end
- end
-
- def test_file_names_beginning_with_dot_can_be_wrapped_in_lambda
- verbose(false) do
-
- create_file(".foo")
- rule '.o' => lambda { ".foo" } do |t|
- @runs << "#{t.name} - #{t.source}"
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal ["#{OBJFILE} - .foo"], @runs
- end
- end
-
- def test_file_names_containing_percent_can_be_wrapped_in_lambda
- verbose(false) do
- create_file("foo%x")
- rule '.o' => lambda { "foo%x" } do |t|
- @runs << "#{t.name} - #{t.source}"
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal ["#{OBJFILE} - foo%x"], @runs
- end
- end
-
- def test_non_extension_rule_name_refers_to_file
- verbose(false) do
- create_file("abc.c")
- rule "abc" => '.c' do |t|
- @runs << t.name
- end
- Task["abc"].invoke
- assert_equal ["abc"], @runs
- end
- end
-
- def test_pathmap_automatically_applies_to_name
- verbose(false) do
- create_file("zzabc.c")
- rule ".o" => 'zz%{x,a}n.c' do |t|
- @runs << "#{t.name} - #{t.source}"
- end
- Task["xbc.o"].invoke
- assert_equal ["xbc.o - zzabc.c"], @runs
- end
- end
-
- def test_plain_strings_are_just_filenames
- verbose(false) do
- create_file("plainname")
- rule ".o" => 'plainname' do |t|
- @runs << "#{t.name} - #{t.source}"
- end
- Task["xbc.o"].invoke
- assert_equal ["xbc.o - plainname"], @runs
- end
- end
-
- def test_rule_runs_when_explicit_task_has_no_actions
- create_file(SRCFILE)
- create_file(SRCFILE2)
- delete_file(OBJFILE)
- rule '.o' => '.c' do |t|
- @runs << t.source
- end
- file OBJFILE => [SRCFILE2]
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [SRCFILE], @runs
- end
-
- def test_close_matches_on_name_do_not_trigger_rule
- create_file("x.c")
- rule '.o' => ['.c'] do |t|
- @runs << t.name
- end
- assert_raises(RuntimeError) { Task['x.obj'].invoke }
- assert_raises(RuntimeError) { Task['x.xyo'].invoke }
- end
-
- def test_rule_rebuilds_obj_when_source_is_newer
- create_timed_files(OBJFILE, SRCFILE)
- rule(/\.o$/ => ['.c']) do
- @runs << :RULE
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [:RULE], @runs
- end
-
- def test_rule_with_two_sources_runs_if_both_sources_are_present
- create_timed_files(OBJFILE, SRCFILE, SRCFILE2)
- rule OBJFILE => [lambda { SRCFILE }, lambda { SRCFILE2 }] do
- @runs << :RULE
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [:RULE], @runs
- end
-
- def test_rule_with_two_sources_but_one_missing_does_not_run
- create_timed_files(OBJFILE, SRCFILE)
- delete_file(SRCFILE2)
- rule OBJFILE => [lambda { SRCFILE }, lambda { SRCFILE2 }] do
- @runs << :RULE
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [], @runs
- end
-
- def test_rule_with_two_sources_builds_both_sources
- task 'x.aa'
- task 'x.bb'
- rule '.a' => '.aa' do
- @runs << "A"
- end
- rule '.b' => '.bb' do
- @runs << "B"
- end
- rule ".c" => ['.a', '.b'] do
- @runs << "C"
- end
- Task["x.c"].invoke
- assert_equal ["A", "B", "C"], @runs.sort
- end
-
- def test_second_rule_runs_when_first_rule_doesnt
- create_timed_files(OBJFILE, SRCFILE)
- delete_file(SRCFILE2)
- rule OBJFILE => [lambda { SRCFILE }, lambda { SRCFILE2 }] do
- @runs << :RULE1
- end
- rule OBJFILE => [lambda { SRCFILE }] do
- @runs << :RULE2
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [:RULE2], @runs
- end
-
- def test_second_rule_doest_run_if_first_triggers
- create_timed_files(OBJFILE, SRCFILE, SRCFILE2)
- rule OBJFILE => [lambda { SRCFILE }, lambda { SRCFILE2 }] do
- @runs << :RULE1
- end
- rule OBJFILE => [lambda { SRCFILE }] do
- @runs << :RULE2
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [:RULE1], @runs
- end
-
- def test_second_rule_doest_run_if_first_triggers_with_reversed_rules
- create_timed_files(OBJFILE, SRCFILE, SRCFILE2)
- rule OBJFILE => [lambda { SRCFILE }] do
- @runs << :RULE1
- end
- rule OBJFILE => [lambda { SRCFILE }, lambda { SRCFILE2 }] do
- @runs << :RULE2
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal [:RULE1], @runs
- end
-
- def test_rule_with_proc_dependent_will_trigger
- mkdir_p("src/jw")
- create_file("src/jw/X.java")
- rule %r(classes/.*\.class) => [
- proc { |fn| fn.pathmap("%{classes,src}d/%n.java") }
- ] do |task|
- assert_equal task.name, 'classes/jw/X.class'
- assert_equal task.source, 'src/jw/X.java'
- @runs << :RULE
- end
- Task['classes/jw/X.class'].invoke
- assert_equal [:RULE], @runs
- ensure
- rm_r("src", :verbose=>false) rescue nil
- end
-
- def test_proc_returning_lists_are_flattened_into_prereqs
- ran = false
- mkdir_p("flatten")
- create_file("flatten/a.txt")
- task 'flatten/b.data' do |t|
- ran = true
- touch t.name, :verbose => false
- end
- rule '.html' =>
- proc { |fn|
- [
- fn.ext("txt"),
- "flatten/b.data"
- ]
- } do |task|
- end
- Task['flatten/a.html'].invoke
- assert ran, "Should have triggered flattened dependency"
- ensure
- rm_r("flatten", :verbose=>false) rescue nil
- end
-
- def test_recursive_rules_will_work_as_long_as_they_terminate
- actions = []
- create_file("abc.xml")
- rule '.y' => '.xml' do actions << 'y' end
- rule '.c' => '.y' do actions << 'c'end
- rule '.o' => '.c' do actions << 'o'end
- rule '.exe' => '.o' do actions << 'exe'end
- Task["abc.exe"].invoke
- assert_equal ['y', 'c', 'o', 'exe'], actions
- end
-
- def test_recursive_rules_that_dont_terminate_will_overflow
- create_file("a.a")
- prev = 'a'
- ('b'..'z').each do |letter|
- rule ".#{letter}" => ".#{prev}" do |t| puts "#{t.name}" end
- prev = letter
- end
- ex = assert_raises(Rake::RuleRecursionOverflowError) {
- Task["a.z"].invoke
- }
- assert_match(/a\.z => a.y/, ex.message)
- end
-
- def test_rules_with_bad_dependents_will_fail
- rule "a" => [1] do |t| puts t.name end
- assert_raises(RuntimeError) do Task['a'].invoke end
- end
-
- def test_string_rule_with_args
- delete_file(OBJFILE)
- create_file(SRCFILE)
- rule '.o', [:a] => SRCFILE do |t, args|
- assert_equal 'arg', args.a
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke('arg')
- end
-
- def test_regex_rule_with_args
- delete_file(OBJFILE)
- create_file(SRCFILE)
- rule(/.o$/, [:a] => SRCFILE) do |t, args|
- assert_equal 'arg', args.a
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke('arg')
- end
-
- def test_string_rule_with_args_and_lambda_prereq
- delete_file(OBJFILE)
- create_file(SRCFILE)
- rule '.o', [:a] => [lambda{SRCFILE}]do |t, args|
- assert_equal 'arg', args.a
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke('arg')
- end
-
- def test_regex_rule_with_args_and_lambda_prereq
- delete_file(OBJFILE)
- create_file(SRCFILE)
- rule(/.o$/, [:a] => [lambda{SRCFILE}]) do |t, args|
- assert_equal 'arg', args.a
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke('arg')
- end
-
- def test_rule_with_method_prereq
- create_file(".foo")
- obj = Object.new
- def obj.find_prereq
- ".foo"
- end
- rule '.o' => obj.method(:find_prereq) do |t|
- @runs << "#{t.name} - #{t.source}"
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal ["#{OBJFILE} - .foo"], @runs
- end
-
- def test_rule_with_one_arg_method_prereq
- create_file(SRCFILE)
- obj = Object.new
- def obj.find_prereq(task_name)
- task_name.ext(".c")
- end
- rule '.o' => obj.method(:find_prereq) do |t|
- @runs << "#{t.name} - #{t.source}"
- end
- Task[OBJFILE].invoke
- assert_equal ["#{OBJFILE} - abc.c"], @runs
- end
-
-end