summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/spec/ruby/core/basicobject/instance_exec_spec.rb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'spec/ruby/core/basicobject/instance_exec_spec.rb')
-rw-r--r--spec/ruby/core/basicobject/instance_exec_spec.rb107
1 files changed, 107 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/spec/ruby/core/basicobject/instance_exec_spec.rb b/spec/ruby/core/basicobject/instance_exec_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..f41af6f64f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/ruby/core/basicobject/instance_exec_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+require File.expand_path('../../../spec_helper', __FILE__)
+require File.expand_path('../fixtures/classes', __FILE__)
+
+describe "BasicObject#instance_exec" do
+ it "is a public instance method" do
+ BasicObject.should have_public_instance_method(:instance_exec)
+ end
+
+ it "sets self to the receiver in the context of the passed block" do
+ a = BasicObject.new
+ a.instance_exec { self }.equal?(a).should be_true
+ end
+
+ it "passes arguments to the block" do
+ a = BasicObject.new
+ a.instance_exec(1) { |b| b }.should equal(1)
+ end
+
+ it "raises a LocalJumpError unless given a block" do
+ lambda { "hola".instance_exec }.should raise_error(LocalJumpError)
+ end
+
+ it "has an arity of -1" do
+ Object.new.method(:instance_exec).arity.should == -1
+ end
+
+ it "accepts arguments with a block" do
+ lambda { "hola".instance_exec(4, 5) { |a,b| a + b } }.should_not raise_error
+ end
+
+ it "doesn't pass self to the block as an argument" do
+ "hola".instance_exec { |o| o }.should be_nil
+ end
+
+ it "passes any arguments to the block" do
+ Object.new.instance_exec(1,2) {|one, two| one + two}.should == 3
+ end
+
+ it "only binds the exec to the receiver" do
+ f = Object.new
+ f.instance_exec do
+ def foo
+ 1
+ end
+ end
+ f.foo.should == 1
+ lambda { Object.new.foo }.should raise_error(NoMethodError)
+ end
+
+ # TODO: This should probably be replaced with a "should behave like" that uses
+ # the many scoping/binding specs from kernel/eval_spec, since most of those
+ # behaviors are the same for instance_exec. See also module_eval/class_eval.
+
+ it "binds self to the receiver" do
+ s = "hola"
+ (s == s.instance_exec { self }).should == true
+ end
+
+ it "binds the block's binding self to the receiver" do
+ s = "hola"
+ (s == s.instance_exec { eval "self", binding }).should == true
+ end
+
+ it "executes in the context of the receiver" do
+ "Ruby-fu".instance_exec { size }.should == 7
+ Object.class_eval { "Ruby-fu".instance_exec{ to_s } }.should == "Ruby-fu"
+ end
+
+ it "has access to receiver's instance variables" do
+ BasicObjectSpecs::IVars.new.instance_exec { @secret }.should == 99
+ end
+
+ it "sets class variables in the receiver" do
+ BasicObjectSpecs::InstExec.class_variables.should include(:@@count)
+ BasicObjectSpecs::InstExec.send(:class_variable_get, :@@count).should == 2
+ end
+
+ it "raises a TypeError when defining methods on an immediate" do
+ lambda do
+ 1.instance_exec { def foo; end }
+ end.should raise_error(TypeError)
+ lambda do
+ :foo.instance_exec { def foo; end }
+ end.should raise_error(TypeError)
+ end
+
+quarantine! do # Not clean, leaves cvars lying around to break other specs
+ it "scopes class var accesses in the caller when called on a Fixnum" do
+ # Fixnum can take instance vars
+ Fixnum.class_eval "@@__tmp_instance_exec_spec = 1"
+ (defined? @@__tmp_instance_exec_spec).should == nil
+
+ @@__tmp_instance_exec_spec = 2
+ 1.instance_exec { @@__tmp_instance_exec_spec }.should == 2
+ Fixnum.__send__(:remove_class_variable, :@@__tmp_instance_exec_spec)
+ end
+end
+
+ it "raises a TypeError when defining methods on numerics" do
+ lambda do
+ (1.0).instance_exec { def foo; end }
+ end.should raise_error(TypeError)
+ lambda do
+ (1 << 64).instance_exec { def foo; end }
+ end.should raise_error(TypeError)
+ end
+end