Add a cache for class variables

This change implements a cache for class variables. Previously there was
no cache for cvars. Cvar access is slow due to needing to travel all the
way up th ancestor tree before returning the cvar value. The deeper the
ancestor tree the slower cvar access will be.

The benefits of the cache are more visible with a higher number of
included modules due to the way Ruby looks up class variables. The
benchmark here includes 26 modules and shows with the cache, this branch
is 6.5x faster when accessing class variables.

```
compare-ruby: ruby 3.1.0dev (2021-03-15T06:22:34Z master 9e5105ca45) [x86_64-darwin19]
built-ruby: ruby 3.1.0dev (2021-03-15T12:12:44Z add-cache-for-clas.. c6be0093ae) [x86_64-darwin19]

|         |compare-ruby|built-ruby|
|:--------|-----------:|---------:|
|vm_cvar  |      5.681M|   36.980M|
|         |           -|     6.51x|
```

Benchmark.ips calling `ActiveRecord::Base.logger` from within a Rails
application. ActiveRecord::Base.logger has 71 ancestors. The more
ancestors a tree has, the more clear the speed increase. IE if Base had
only one ancestor we'd see no improvement. This benchmark is run on a
vanilla Rails application.

Benchmark code:

```ruby
require "benchmark/ips"
require_relative "config/environment"

Benchmark.ips do |x|
  x.report "logger" do
    ActiveRecord::Base.logger
  end
end
```

Ruby 3.0 master / Rails 6.1:

```
Warming up --------------------------------------
              logger   155.251k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
```

Ruby 3.0 with cvar cache /  Rails 6.1:

```
Warming up --------------------------------------
              logger     1.546M i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
              logger     14.857M (± 4.8%) i/s -     74.198M in   5.006202s
```

Lastly we ran a benchmark to demonstate the difference between master
and our cache when the number of modules increases. This benchmark
measures 1 ancestor, 30 ancestors, and 100 ancestors.

Ruby 3.0 master:

```
Warming up --------------------------------------
            1 module     1.231M i/100ms
          30 modules   432.020k i/100ms
         100 modules   145.399k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
            1 module     12.210M (± 2.1%) i/s -     61.553M in   5.043400s
          30 modules      4.354M (± 2.7%) i/s -     22.033M in   5.063839s
         100 modules      1.434M (± 2.9%) i/s -      7.270M in   5.072531s

Comparison:
            1 module: 12209958.3 i/s
          30 modules:  4354217.8 i/s - 2.80x  (± 0.00) slower
         100 modules:  1434447.3 i/s - 8.51x  (± 0.00) slower
```

Ruby 3.0 with cvar cache:

```
Warming up --------------------------------------
            1 module     1.641M i/100ms
          30 modules     1.655M i/100ms
         100 modules     1.620M i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
            1 module     16.279M (± 3.8%) i/s -     82.038M in   5.046923s
          30 modules     15.891M (± 3.9%) i/s -     79.459M in   5.007958s
         100 modules     16.087M (± 3.6%) i/s -     81.005M in   5.041931s

Comparison:
            1 module: 16279458.0 i/s
         100 modules: 16087484.6 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error
          30 modules: 15891406.2 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error
```

Co-authored-by: Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@ruby-lang.org>

1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/benchmark/vm_cvar.yml b/benchmark/vm_cvar.yml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..1d0e161829
--- /dev/null
+++ b/benchmark/vm_cvar.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+prelude: |
+  class A
+    @@foo = 1
+
+    def self.foo
+      @@foo
+    end
+
+    ("A".."Z").each do |module_name|
+      eval <<-EOM
+        module #{module_name}
+        end
+
+        include #{module_name}
+      EOM
+    end
+  end
+benchmark:
+  vm_cvar: A.foo
+loop_count: 600000