summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYusuke Endoh <mame@ruby-lang.org>2021-06-18 17:54:02 +0900
committerYusuke Endoh <mame@ruby-lang.org>2021-06-29 15:49:51 +0900
commit39f99b8176ddec14058919ae8a317ea0c5216812 (patch)
treec18cab70ac5f7841721e1ed1b8dca0367f8545ce
parent809f1203744e25fc4d095863593edbfb71529249 (diff)
Use assert_not_match "Did you mean?" for UncorrectableNameCheckTest
... instead of exact matching. I'm now creating a built-in gem that modifies Exception's error message, so the expectation value is changed. IMO, it is good to check that did_you_mean suggestion is NOT added in the uncorrectable case. https://github.com/ruby/did_you_mean/commit/ebe88ec4d2
-rw-r--r--test/did_you_mean/spell_checking/test_uncorrectable_name_check.rb2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/test/did_you_mean/spell_checking/test_uncorrectable_name_check.rb b/test/did_you_mean/spell_checking/test_uncorrectable_name_check.rb
index 5d934e5f70..2fa65bb699 100644
--- a/test/did_you_mean/spell_checking/test_uncorrectable_name_check.rb
+++ b/test/did_you_mean/spell_checking/test_uncorrectable_name_check.rb
@@ -10,6 +10,6 @@ class UncorrectableNameCheckTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
end
def test_message
- assert_equal "Other name error", @error.message
+ assert_not_match /Did you mean\?/, @error.message
end
end