This change implements a fallback mode for the `--yjit-dump-disasm`
development command-line option to make it usable in release builds.
Previously, using the option with release builds of YJIT yielded only
a warning asking the user to build with `--enable-yjit=dev`.
While builds that use the `disasm` feature still give the best output,
just having the comments is useful enough for many kinds of debugging.
Having it usable in release builds is nice for new hackers, too, since
this allows for tinkering without having to learn how to build YJIT in
development mode.
Sample output on A64:
```
# regenerate_branch
# Insn: 0001 opt_send_without_block (stack_size: 1)
# guard known object with singleton class
0x11f7e0034: 4b 00 00 58 03 00 00 14 08 ce 9c 04 01 00 00
0x11f7e0043: 00 3f 00 0b eb 81 06 01 54 1f 20 03 d5
# RUBY_VM_CHECK_INTS(ec)
0x11f7e0050: 8b 02 42 b8 cb 07 01 35
# stack overflow check
0x11f7e0058: ab 62 02 91 7f 02 0b eb 69 07 01 54
# save PC to CFP
0x11f7e0064: 0b 3b 9a d2 2b 2f a0 f2 0b 00 cc f2 6b 02 00
0x11f7e0073: f8 ab 82 00 91
```
To ensure this feature doesn't incur too much cost when running without
the `--yjit-dump-disasm` option, I checked that there is no significant
impact to compile time and memory usage with the `compile_time_ns` and
`yjit_alloc_size` entry in `RubyVM::YJIT.runtime_stats`. For each
sample, I ran 3 iterations of the `lobsters` YJIT benchmark. The
statistics summary and done with the `summary` function in R.
Compile time, sample size of 60, lower is better:
```
Before After
Min. :2.054e+09 Min. :2.028e+09
1st Qu.:2.069e+09 1st Qu.:2.044e+09
Median :2.081e+09 Median :2.060e+09
Mean :2.089e+09 Mean :2.066e+09
3rd Qu.:2.109e+09 3rd Qu.:2.085e+09
Max. :2.146e+09 Max. :2.144e+09
```
Allocation size, sample size of 20, lower is better:
```
Before After
Min. :21804742 Min. :21794082
1st Qu.:21826682 1st Qu.:21816282
Median :21844042 Median :21826814
Mean :21960664 Mean :22026291
3rd Qu.:21861228 3rd Qu.:22040439
Max. :22587426 Max. :22930614
```
The `yjit_alloc_size` samples are noisy, but since the average increased
by only 0.3%, and the median is lower, I feel safe saying that there is
no significant change.