ruby.git/test/ruby/test_defined.rb, branch v4.0.2 The Ruby Programming Language Handle void expressions in defined? 2025-03-18T18:44:28+00:00 Kevin Newton kddnewton@gmail.com 2025-03-18T17:40:49+00:00 adaaa7878ebee62888bf3547d14c1db4938da88a [Bug #21029] 
[Bug #21029]
Handle hash and splat nodes in defined? 2024-06-24T18:32:58+00:00 Jeremy Evans code@jeremyevans.net 2024-06-24T18:32:58+00:00 ae0c7faa79029ebe615487d23c8ee1ca44ce4a36 This supports the nodes in both in the parse.y and prism compilers. Fixes [Bug #20043] Co-authored-by: Kevin Newton <kddnewton@gmail.com> 
This supports the nodes in both in the parse.y and prism compilers.

Fixes [Bug #20043]

Co-authored-by: Kevin Newton <kddnewton@gmail.com>
 Make defined? for op asgn expressions to constants use "assignment" 2024-01-11T00:02:38+00:00 Jeremy Evans code@jeremyevans.net 2024-01-10T21:07:34+00:00 ef751252711ca7ecabb3e4ad9214fa0d1d63608a Previously, it used "expression", as that was the default. However, op asgn expressions to constants use the NODE_OP_CDECL, so recognize that node type as assignement. Fixes [Bug #20111] 
Previously, it used "expression", as that was the default.  However,
op asgn expressions to constants use the NODE_OP_CDECL, so recognize
that node type as assignement.

Fixes [Bug #20111]
Wrap `undef_method :a` with `ensure` 2023-04-26T14:21:20+00:00 Gary Tou gary@garytou.com 2023-04-26T13:08:16+00:00 78be6696d864513ffad395ecd37d582143ca1216 






Test: `defined?(super)` in `BasicObject` returns `nil`
2023-04-26T14:21:20+00:00

Gary Tou
gary@garytou.com

2023-04-26T03:22:48+00:00

5dd46a345a7f02a55ef26302ae4d52473c433da0

Ensure it returns `nil` instead of segmentation faulting





Ensure it returns `nil` instead of segmentation faulting







Add more tests for defined? with method calls
2021-03-29T14:45:15+00:00

Jeremy Evans
code@jeremyevans.net

2021-02-23T20:21:41+00:00

62e66aedb08745eb7ff95575b5555c72baf1d961












Warn the defined location as deprecation as well as the main message
2021-01-23T10:58:39+00:00

Nobuyoshi Nakada
nobu@ruby-lang.org

2021-01-23T10:57:07+00:00

8dfae85adb96cf3da84bf38f2103969d4a7aed3f

[Bug #17575]





[Bug #17575]







Revert "[Bug #11213] let defined?(super) call respond_to_missing?"
2021-01-13T09:11:46+00:00

Nobuyoshi Nakada
nobu@ruby-lang.org

2021-01-13T07:49:05+00:00

85b5d4c8bf4cdcba4f1af65f2bc0c8ac716cb795

This reverts commit fac2498e0299f13dffe4f09a7dd7657fb49bf643 for
now, due to [Bug #17509], the breakage in the case `super` is
called in `respond_to?`.





This reverts commit fac2498e0299f13dffe4f09a7dd7657fb49bf643 for
now, due to [Bug #17509], the breakage in the case `super` is
called in `respond_to?`.







[Bug #11213] let defined?(super) call respond_to_missing?
2020-11-20T07:04:45+00:00

Nobuyoshi Nakada
nobu@ruby-lang.org

2020-11-17T12:17:19+00:00

fac2498e0299f13dffe4f09a7dd7657fb49bf643












Properly resolve refinements in defined? on private call [Bug #16932]
2020-06-03T17:12:57+00:00

Nobuyoshi Nakada
nobu@ruby-lang.org

2020-06-03T14:06:06+00:00

184f78314e98cab63e7503cead4a4e99bd132a08