ruby.git/test/prism/fixtures/defined.txt, branch v3_4_9 The Ruby Programming Language [ruby/prism] Accept a newline after the defined? keyword [Backport #21197] (#13327) 2025-07-09T21:51:32+00:00 Takashi Kokubun takashi.kokubun@shopify.com 2025-07-09T21:51:32+00:00 1e3d24a0f47e142270bfb6073feb77f6364af052 * [ruby/prism] Accept a newline after the defined? keyword [Bug #21197] https://github.com/ruby/prism/commit/22be955ce9 * Fix a compilation error Co-authored-by: Stan Lo <stan001212@gmail.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Kevin Newton <kddnewton@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Stan Lo <stan001212@gmail.com> 
* [ruby/prism] Accept a newline after the defined? keyword

[Bug #21197]

https://github.com/ruby/prism/commit/22be955ce9

* Fix a compilation error

Co-authored-by: Stan Lo <stan001212@gmail.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Kevin Newton <kddnewton@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Stan Lo <stan001212@gmail.com>
 Revert "merge revision(s) 052794bfe1970e90f4f4f9e37fc362dd27903a8d: [Backport #21197]" 2025-04-14T07:29:03+00:00 Takashi Kokubun takashikkbn@gmail.com 2025-04-14T07:29:03+00:00 1c23c3095325a4ade2064cc3b35ce8e678e03ebf This reverts commit e630a0f7ae909dafe2e1dbc47baf90cd795b4a5f. 
This reverts commit e630a0f7ae909dafe2e1dbc47baf90cd795b4a5f.
merge revision(s) 052794bfe1970e90f4f4f9e37fc362dd27903a8d: [Backport #21197] 2025-04-14T07:18:37+00:00 Takashi Kokubun takashikkbn@gmail.com 2025-04-14T07:18:37+00:00 e630a0f7ae909dafe2e1dbc47baf90cd795b4a5f [ruby/prism] Accept a newline after the defined? keyword [Bug #21197] https://github.com/ruby/prism/commit/22be955ce9 
	[ruby/prism] Accept a newline after the defined? keyword

	[Bug #21197]

	https://github.com/ruby/prism/commit/22be955ce9
[ruby/prism] Fix defined with new line 2023-12-05T20:47:22+00:00 eileencodes eileencodes@gmail.com 2023-12-05T16:34:20+00:00 a33632e1ca7af1e3ba34cff05643aa067561a8cc It's possible to write the following and have it be valid Ruby: ``` defined?("foo" ) ``` But Prism wasn't taking the new line into account. This adds an `accept1` for a `PM_TOKEN_NEWLINE` to account for this. I've also updated the fixtures and snapshots to test this. https://github.com/ruby/prism/commit/b87f8eedc6 
It's possible to write the following and have it be valid Ruby:

```
defined?("foo"
)
```

But Prism wasn't taking the new line into account. This adds an
`accept1` for a `PM_TOKEN_NEWLINE` to account for this. I've also
updated the fixtures and snapshots to test this.

https://github.com/ruby/prism/commit/b87f8eedc6
Rename YARP filepaths to prism filepaths 2023-09-27T17:57:38+00:00 Kevin Newton kddnewton@gmail.com 2023-09-27T16:22:36+00:00 8ab56869a64fdccc094f4a83c6367fb23b72d38b