[PATCH] [Bug #21819] Data objects without members should also be frozen

We don't set RSTRUCT_GEN_FIELDS when RCLASS_MAX_IV_COUNT(klass) != 0, so
we need to set RSTRUCT_SET_FIELDS_OBJ to 0 otherwise it may have an
invalid value and crash.

[Bug #21710]

- struct.c: `struct_alloc`

It is possible for a `NEWOBJ` tracepoint call back to write fields
into a newly allocated object before `struct_alloc` had the time
to set the `RSTRUCT_GEN_FIELDS` flags and such.

Hence we can't blindly initialize the `fields_obj` reference to `0`
we first need to check no fields were added yet.

- object.c: `rb_class_allocate_instance`

Similarly, if a `NEWOBJ` tracepoint tries to set fields on the object,
the `shape_id` must already be set, as it's required on T_OBJECT to
know where to write fields.

`NEWOBJ_OF` had to be refactored to accept a `shape_id`.

Now that we no longer explicitly set the first three elements, we need
to ensure the object is in a state safe for GC before we call
struct_heap_alloc, which may GC.

It's not rare for structs to have additional ivars, hence are one
of the most common, if not the most common type in the `gen_fields_tbl`.

This can cause Ractor contention, but even in single ractor mode
means having to do a hash lookup to access the ivars, and increase
GC work.

Instead, unless the struct is perfectly right sized, we can store
a reference to the associated IMEMO/fields object right after the
last struct member.

```
compare-ruby: ruby 3.5.0dev (2025-08-06T12:50:36Z struct-ivar-fields-2 9a30d141a1) +PRISM [arm64-darwin24]
built-ruby: ruby 3.5.0dev (2025-08-06T12:57:59Z struct-ivar-fields-2 2ff3ec237f) +PRISM [arm64-darwin24]
warming up.....

|                      |compare-ruby|built-ruby|
|:---------------------|-----------:|---------:|
|member_reader         |    590.317k|  579.246k|
|                      |       1.02x|         -|
|member_writer         |    543.963k|  527.104k|
|                      |       1.03x|         -|
|member_reader_method  |    213.540k|  213.004k|
|                      |       1.00x|         -|
|member_writer_method  |    192.657k|  191.491k|
|                      |       1.01x|         -|
|ivar_reader           |    403.993k|  569.915k|
|                      |           -|     1.41x|
```

Co-Authored-By: Étienne Barrié <etienne.barrie@gmail.com>

Keep `NONE` within `Measure`