<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>ruby.git/spec/bundler/support/options.rb, branch v4.0.3</title>
<subtitle>The Ruby Programming Language</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.ruby-lang.org/ruby.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>[rubygems/rubygems] Stop depending on `pathname` for subprocess launching</title>
<updated>2024-06-06T18:44:52+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Rodriguez</name>
<email>deivid.rodriguez@riseup.net</email>
</author>
<published>2021-10-18T19:11:12+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.ruby-lang.org/ruby.git/commit/?id=da75df2f75648d7ff87e4701874b2b425ca83f71'/>
<id>da75df2f75648d7ff87e4701874b2b425ca83f71</id>
<content type='text'>
When launching bundler subprocesses for end to end testing, all of them
will load the `spec/support/rubygems_version_manager.rb` file passed as
a ruby's `-r` flag.

Unfortunately this file depends on `pathname`, so unless we drop that
dependency, we can't really test support for including the `pathname`
gem in the `Gemfile`.

This commit implements some refactorings to avoid loading `pathname`
inside `bundler` test subprocesses.

https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/c1f948788c
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
When launching bundler subprocesses for end to end testing, all of them
will load the `spec/support/rubygems_version_manager.rb` file passed as
a ruby's `-r` flag.

Unfortunately this file depends on `pathname`, so unless we drop that
dependency, we can't really test support for including the `pathname`
gem in the `Gemfile`.

This commit implements some refactorings to avoid loading `pathname`
inside `bundler` test subprocesses.

https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/c1f948788c
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
